• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Joe dart .. Ernie ball jazz !

But - what really amazes me is that although they're doing TWO Dart signature models, they never did a signature model for Flea or Tony Levin (note: I know there was a short-lived OLP Levin model, but that doesn't really count).

Two of the most successful and visible players of the last couple of decades, who basically built their sounds and personas with MusicMan basses, and neither of them got an "official" signature bass.

Or even Pino, for that matter, who basically
put the fretless Stingray on the map in the '80s with Paul Young and others.

Go figure. If I had Flea or Tony playing my basses, I'd have them up on billboards in Times Square.
I think the issue with Flea and TL not getting signature models is due to who was in charge of business decisions at the time. The last several years have seen EBMM doing a lot more unique features and signature models, indicating a changing of the guard to me.
 
A Stingray, with its active preamp, costs them more money to make than a passive bass, especially one with no tone control(s).

In terms of parts, yeah.

But any time they make an instrument that isn't a standard StingRay Special, it disrupts their production line.

StingRays are their bread and butter - guaranteed money in the bank.

If they're not making as many StingRays, they're effectively losing money, so the cost of anything that isn't a StingRay has to cover the disruption, and help mitigate the risk.

They've already stated that due to Covid, and the resultant global supply line issues, they've had to temporarily cease production of anything other than StingRay Specials (that's why they aren't currently making StingRay Classics), and the range of available colours will be more limited.

Consequently, there have been more BFR offerings, whereby they've taken the StingRay Special, and dressed it up for the ball.

And yet they've still managed to release the Tim Commerford, the DarkRay, the Cliff Wiliams, the Joe Dart short scale, and now the Joe Dart 2, all during the pandemic.

It seems they were only able to remain that agile, by being a small family owned company, that had the autonomy to be able to scale back, focus on the essentials, and do right by their highly valued, highly skilled American work force, paying taxes in California.

Who wouldn't want to pay less for their instruments?
But I get why they're priced the way they are.
 
Just like the $7000 Cliff Williams Stingray…?
Not justifying the cost. But the entire EBMM proceeds from the first run Cliff Williams sig went to charity. That was in the marketing blast.
Plus, there is a significant delta in the commercial viability of AC/DC and Vulfpeck. We can debate our preferences but we can’t dispute the relative marketing value. Not suggesting in any way that one is not a good bassist. Just that if Cliff Williams puts his name on something to you have to consider from their perspective the ceiling is higher.
 
Just got a magical notification in my inbox that it's here --

Joe Dart II | Basses | Ernie Ball Music Man

Thoughts?

I can't afford it anyway, but it's sure purdy.


You know, I recently (3 months) ago purchases a SBMM Ray34H PB. I paid like 1,000 bucks for it new. AS of today, I wouldn't trade basses with a EBMM Stingray for just about any amount of money and I damned well wouldn't shell out $2600 bucks for one either. It's not that I don't appreciate the EBMM - I DO. However, playing this "cheap" copy of one, I can NOT tell the difference between the $1,000 bass and the $2600 "higher end" model.

YMMY -- And only one man's opinion......... :D
 
where is the Louis Johnson , Bernard Edwards, Paul Denman, Tony Levin, John Deacon signature models? These players put StingRays on the map.


Unfortunately most of those guys are no longer around (or active) to endorse such models.

Besides the potential for legal complexities, when dealing with deceased artists, I'm not entirely sure how much use legacy artists are, in terms of appealing to a younger market.

Seems to make more sense to inspire the next generation, with the current generation of hot endorsers.

Legend has it that after EBMM introduced the "Flea" bridge (as a direct result of feedback from Flea, suggesting that they reposition the bridge slightly offset, to prevent the strings from being so easily pulled out of the saddles, by aggressive finger players) Flea wanted the StingRay to be re-branded as "The Flea Bass".

That may be apocryphal, but supposedly EBMM's refusal to capitulate, is why they fell out.

Tony Levin has repeatedly stated that he has no interest in a signature model - it's important to him to be able to go into any music store in the world, grab a stock StingRay off the stand, and it's exactly the same everywhere.

I share the same sentiment as Tony, although since he first made that statement, the StingRay itself has been through quite a few changes (as have music stores etc), so fat chance of walking in to Guitar Centre in 2022, and finding a brand new 1987 StingRay.
 
Seems there is always a debate about signature models and who the model was made for or after. Some of us look past whatever name is on the neck plate and focus on the specs. I have a Fender Adam Clayton P bass in purple sparkle. U2 is okay. I can tolerate them. The bass however has an awesome sparkle finish with maple board, abalone block inlay, jazz bass nut width, and painted headstock. That's what I have it. This Joe Dart model is no different. The specs are what interested me, not so much the name on it.

Yep. I have two guitars and both are signature models. One is a Schecter Nick Johnston, who is a player I really dig, and it's the greatest strat I've ever played. The other one is a Steve Lukather SBMM signature guitar... I'm not into Lukather/Toto at all, but damn, that's one fine player's guitar. Soft V neck, absurdly comfortable, the pickup voicing is super versatile, and the preamp boost switch to kick the amp into overdrive is a nifty little touch. The specs are what made me consider both of those.
 
Nice.

Grumpy crew, start your engines!
VAROOM VAROOOM!

Dart.jpeg
 
That is some serious music major Funk. Funk is finding itself being maintained by music education the way Jazz has been for the last fifty or so years. It is good to see the fruits of that education.
ha! yes. great comment. Listening to this form of funk is an interesting experience. I mean, it IS funky in a slick sort of way. And yet, it kind of feels hyper produced (as in "music major funk") While I get the great groove, I'm personally more of an old school funk appreciator myself.

I guess I kind of feel the same way about Joe Dart and Vulfpeck. It's hard to argue that they don't bring it, they play well and they seem honestly committed to the genre ... and it's cool that younger cats are bringing the joy like they do, but it all kind of feels sort of like an imitation (a very good one mind you).

Ah well, to each his own.

back to the OP's thread about the Joe Dart II bass
 
  • Like
Reactions: weird_hermiston
ha! yes. great comment. Listening to this form of funk is an interesting experience. I mean, it IS funky in a slick sort of way. And yet, it kind of feels hyper produced (as in "music major funk") While I get the great groove, I'm personally more of an old school funk appreciator myself.

I guess I kind of feel the same way about Joe Dart and Vulfpeck. It's hard to argue that they don't bring it, they play well and they seem honestly committed to the genre ... and it's cool that younger cats are bringing the joy like they do, but it all kind of feels sort of like an imitation (a very good one mind you).

Ah well, to each his own.

back to the OP's thread about the Joe Dart II bass

I respect the music majors. You can’t bring the Seventies back anymore than we can bring back post war Chicago. After a while, genres become codified and at least a little formulaic. No matter what I will always love a good Funk groove.:bassist:
 
Yep. I have two guitars and both are signature models. One is a Schecter Nick Johnston, who is a player I really dig, and it's the greatest strat I've ever played. The other one is a Steve Lukather SBMM signature guitar... I'm not into Lukather/Toto at all, but damn, that's one fine player's guitar. Soft V neck, absurdly comfortable, the pickup voicing is super versatile, and the preamp boost switch to kick the amp into overdrive is a nifty little touch. The specs are what made me consider both of those.
The Lukather is ridiculously amazing! Don’t have one but I have played one. I owned a Morse signature Sabre guitar in the late 80s and I’m not ashamed to say I sold it for nearly 4x what I paid. But then again that was about $800 new.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dasgre0g