The Santoprene surround is usually a half-roll which supports very generous excursion.
These move much farther than corrugated paper and are quite durable.
The foam surrounds are the cheesy ones.
Low cost, high excursion, short life span in polluted air.
I have a box full of old JBL with rotted foam surrounds. A pity.
Not per se.
Remember that with most designs the Fs is greatly determined by the spider.
Rubber surrounds are IMO very durable and because of their linearity great for hifi purposes.
The foam surrounds were introduced because they were cheaper, but, they also had lower mechanical losses (higher Qms and lower Rms) then the rubber surrounds.
The paper surrounds were used because it was most cheap to produce.
The folded cloth surrounds are IMO best of both worlds, they can be designed to accommodate high excursions and have low mechanical losses. Also, a manufacturer can easily fine-tune the Fs by changing the cloth impregnation. It's also most easy with these surrounds to create a progressive suspension (creating a bigger counter-force the larger the excursion), this wil introduce some (unwanted) distortion when reaching xmax. But with a well designed progressive suspension I do not see any problems with PA use, it's better then a linear suspension which creates immense distortion after it hits xmax.
Just my 2 cents.
Hmm....
Well, that makes me wonder what sort of stuff I may've missed out on/passed over without looking deep enough into it then....
Thanks folks.