And a beauty it is!No back story just my beauty all polished up with some fresh black beauties.
I've had her for about 5 years
Windsor? ... Windsor Virginia?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
And a beauty it is!No back story just my beauty all polished up with some fresh black beauties.
I've had her for about 5 years
No back story just my beauty all polished up with some fresh black beauties.
I've had her for about 5 years
Born October 1993.Looks brand new! What year is it?
Born October 1993.
Was refinished and bridge reconstructed by Phil in early 2000s.
Paging @RichSnyder ......Has anyone here played or bought one of the Kubicki's currently being built by KUBICKI | PHILIP KUBICKI – U.S.A.?
How do they compare and what are they charging?
Paging @RichSnyder ......
Just curious.... there's somewhat of a consensus that many of the post FCS built Kubickis are on the heavy side. My recently acquired '92 sits nicely at 8.5lbs., though a '93 I had was 10.6, and my '94 is still a little hefty at 9.7. How about yours?Born October 1993.
Was refinished and bridge reconstructed by Phil in early 2000s.
I will treat the question as if it were addressed to all.Just curious.... there's somewhat of a consensus that many of the post FCS built Kubickis are on the heavy side. My recently acquired '92 sits nicely at 8.5lbs., though a '93 I had was 10.6, and my '94 is still a little hefty at 9.7. How about yours?
Yes it is on the heavy side. Probably around 10 lbs.Just curious.... there's somewhat of a consensus that many of the post FCS built Kubickis are on the heavy side. My recently acquired '92 sits nicely at 8.5lbs., though a '93 I had was 10.6, and my '94 is still a little hefty at 9.7. How about yours?
Well, detective, my 86 side markers darkened somewhat to an ochre but on the 89 they look closer to cream. I am not going to bother refreshing the colour. It is an old well used bass and I like it that way.Okay...got another subject for you guys...
Side Markers. Most of the side markers were applied epoxy paint. All of mine were done that way except my '94, which looks to have actual plastic inlays. On one of my '90 ExFactors, the markers have darkened and have broken down, somewhat soft. I believe it happened due to a reaction with whatever a previous owner used in a neck refinish. I thought it was just dirty until I realized I was digging out the material in an effort to clean it.
I'm considering sending it to the mothership for some spiffing up. Mike wrote that the epoxy paint can soften up over time and that he repairs those with plastic inlays. It's an added expense to his standard neck refinish package.
So I'm wondering, since I haven't seen this discussed before, how are your side markers done, paint or inlays, and if paint, how are they holding up? Also curious how this is with the pre FCS models since I've never held one.
I apologize for all the questions... my dispatchers use to call me Columbo.
I can appreciate being slapped upside the head with common sense once in a while.I am not going to bother refreshing the colour. It is an old well used bass and I like it that way.
