about 7 month lead time. I'll have mine in about 5 1/2 months![]()
Congratulations! Color/Wood finish?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
about 7 month lead time. I'll have mine in about 5 1/2 months![]()
No idea how close the pickups are. I'd sure love to find out! Please keep us updated.Just ordered a Blaster from one of my favorite dealers to buy from in Japan. Think I got a decent deal because it's dinged a bit and the original electronics were shot. I figured it's one of the better copies because it has the laminate neck, so if I stick one of the Kubicki preamps in there, is it pretty much THE sound or are the pickups radically different?
DittoNo idea how close the pickups are. I'd sure love to find out! Please keep us updated.
Got the Blaster bass today. First impression is WOW. I never thought someone could design an entire instrument around being easy to play. Just looking at pics of this thing I was just like "huh, rare, weird shape headless bass with cool D-tuner system, I guess I'll try it." But actually feeling/playing the bass, I understand completely: Kubicki never wanted someone to fight with one of his basses. It's like he shaped the bass to accommodate his body. Even the neck feels like he measured the actual curve of his hand and then contoured the back to it, but then it also feels perfect to my hand? It's a tailored suit that still fits the 10 people next to you just as well. I wish larger manufacturers would innovate like this, shaping the instrument to the player instead of expecting the player to adjust to the instrument. Neck that never needs to be adjusted seems like a no brainer, why isn't everyone building laminate necks? One of the biggest hurdles as a beginner is adjusting the darn truss rod.No idea how close the pickups are. I'd sure love to find out! Please keep us updated.
Got the Blaster bass today. First impression is WOW. I never thought someone could design an entire instrument around being easy to play. Just looking at pics of this thing I was just like "huh, rare, weird shape headless bass with cool D-tuner system, I guess I'll try it." But actually feeling/playing the bass, I understand completely: Kubicki never wanted someone to fight with one of his basses. It's like he shaped the bass to accommodate his body. Even the neck feels like he measured the actual curve of his hand and then contoured the back to it, but then it also feels perfect to my hand? It's a tailored suit that still fits the 10 people next to you just as well. I wish larger manufacturers would innovate like this, shaping the instrument to the player instead of expecting the player to adjust to the instrument. Neck that never needs to be adjusted seems like a no brainer, why isn't everyone building laminate necks? One of the biggest hurdles as a beginner is adjusting the darn truss rod.
Anyway, I'll try to do the A/B test with the Ex-Factor preamp within next couple of weeks. I don't know how long an order takes but I'll place it this week and see, In the mean-time. this is some sounds from the bass (though not with factory preamp, the broken factory preamp was brighter sounding), maybe you can hear how close the pickups are to the real thing.
The cavity on both 18v & 9v is the same, but... the two are different, the 16v has two active and two passive settings, while the 9v has only one passive setting. What's the merit of adding another 9v to a 9v system? Or is he installing an 18v Kubicki system in a 9v Fender/Kubicki Ex-Factor?Never had a 9v pre, but yes, I think you'll be fine with simply stacking the two 9v batteries.
I can upload a pic of the control cavity if you'd like, but it's just a pot installed backwards. He wanted to install a 3-band EQ with a body that only has 3 holes. Instead of modifying the body, he super glued the mid pot in backwards and put a hole in the custom back cover so the new owner could turn it with a flathead. Kind of ingenius, he could have done a stacked volume/blend or volume/mid like original Kubicki, but it's possible he just didn't have that combination of parts on hand. I don't find myself adjusting mids constantly anyway, so it works out if I wanted to keep it that way.Something very specific I noticed in this vid - while demonstrating it he was adjusting the mid-sweep (?) with the control cover on. (via a hole in the cover) The 9v Fender/Kubicki Ex-Factor has the 9v pre with the adjustable mid-sweep but as far as I know it didn't have a port in the cover to adjust it on-the-fly. I have 2 basses with that pre so will do this simple 'mod' so I can adjust it w/o removing the cover. Frankly I've never touched the mid-sweep setting but if it becomes easily accessible I'm open to see what it does to the basses tone I'm already so familiar with.
Switching an original Kubicki preamp into a Kubicki Blaster that had a 9v Japanese preamp. I don't know which I'd prefer tbh, I know you have more freedom with the 9v but the 18v has a varitone for the presets players seemed to like the most.The cavity on both 18v & 9v is the same, but... the two are different, the 16v has two active and two passive settings, while the 9v has only one passive setting. What's the merit of adding another 9v to a 9v system? Or is he installing an 18v Kubicki system in a 9v Fender/Kubicki Ex-Factor?
interesting mod...I can upload a pic of the control cavity if you'd like, but it's just a pot installed backwards. He wanted to install a 3-band EQ with a body that only has 3 holes. Instead of modifying the body, he super glued the mid pot in backwards and put a hole in the custom back cover so the new owner could turn it with a flathead. Kind of ingenius, he could have done a stacked volume/blend or volume/mid like original Kubicki, but it's possible he just didn't have that combination of parts on hand. I don't find myself adjusting mids constantly anyway, so it works out if I wanted to keep it that way.
Putting a 18v into a Kubicki Blaster with a 9v Japanese preamp. I don't know which I'd prefer tbh, I know you have more freedom with the 9v but the 18v has a varitone for the presets players seemed to like the most.
Okay, good to know. Do you get any hiss or noise on your passive settings?I've never noticed an extreme amount of noise with either 9 or 18v preamps. I never run my BT pots much over 50%. The only detent you should have is on the Pan pot.