• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Kubicki club, part 2

I saw that! At that price I'm shocked it hasn't been snapped up. You could easily ask for more if you aren't in a time crunch.
Unfortunately it is a time thing, I had someone lined up, something else came through so I went for it, they backed out and the first guy ended up buying a bass this morning.. everything was about to work well LOL

What I want, likely won't be around tomorrow
 
  • Like
Reactions: newwavefrank
Quick question! I’m sure this has already been discussed at length here but I couldn’t find it with a quick search.

I consulted a Kubicki Owners’ Manual I found online but that confused me even further. If position 1 of the rotary is Standby Mode, and position 6 is Passive with High Cut then which position is flat?
The manual says 2 is flat and 3 is mid boost, but 2 seems to have much more mids than 3.

A side note: I'm glad I decided to check the manual because I had no idea the tone knobs were boost only! Very interesting.
 
Okay, more important discoveries. With any active bass I almost always set the EQs to the middle (flat) and then adjust as needed, and the Kubucki was no exception. I’ve been basically only using position 2 (mid boost) with the bass boosted half way center and treble cut half way from center.

I’ve been mostly happy with the tone, but the preamp didn’t behave the way I thought it should. Passive modes were MUCH quieter than active, to the point of being basically unusable without serious changes to my amp levels. Plus it always had a bit of a weird “pushed” kind of sound, as if I had a compressor on, or was running out of headroom or something. Very hard to describe. And position 3 was SUPER scooped sounding with massive amounts of bass, which was also a completely unusual tone for me.

Well upon reading that the EQ was BOOST ONLY I decided to turn them all the way down and start there. Holy moly, what an improvement! I’m now using position 3 and just very slightly boosting treble or bass as needed, but mostly leaving them at 0. No wonder the active modes were so much louder and pushed sounding. I was running it with the bass boosted 3/4 of the way up all the time!

I’m much happier with the tones available in the bass now. It was always good sounding, but now it’s excellent sounding.

I only bought this bass because it was such a good deal, fully expecting to sell it once I got it back up and running again. And despite never being happy with an active bass and always preferring more traditional designs, it’s become my number one player. The playability and ergonomics are just so dialed in and tone is incredibly consistent throughout the whole range of the bass.

Anyone else buy one thinking it was just kind of cool, and then it became your number one?
 
Okay, more important discoveries. With any active bass I almost always set the EQs to the middle (flat) and then adjust as needed, and the Kubucki was no exception. I’ve been basically only using position 2 (mid boost) with the bass boosted half way center and treble cut half way from center.

I’ve been mostly happy with the tone, but the preamp didn’t behave the way I thought it should. Passive modes were MUCH quieter than active, to the point of being basically unusable without serious changes to my amp levels. Plus it always had a bit of a weird “pushed” kind of sound, as if I had a compressor on, or was running out of headroom or something. Very hard to describe. And position 3 was SUPER scooped sounding with massive amounts of bass, which was also a completely unusual tone for me.

Well upon reading that the EQ was BOOST ONLY I decided to turn them all the way down and start there. Holy moly, what an improvement! I’m now using position 3 and just very slightly boosting treble or bass as needed, but mostly leaving them at 0. No wonder the active modes were so much louder and pushed sounding. I was running it with the bass boosted 3/4 of the way up all the time!

I’m much happier with the tones available in the bass now. It was always good sounding, but now it’s excellent sounding.

I only bought this bass because it was such a good deal, fully expecting to sell it once I got it back up and running again. And despite never being happy with an active bass and always preferring more traditional designs, it’s become my number one player. The playability and ergonomics are just so dialed in and tone is incredibly consistent throughout the whole range of the bass.

Anyone else buy one thinking it was just kind of cool, and then it became your number one?

I had an earlier one (S/N 3XX) which was not much more than a grand in '87. Cool but never became my #1. That being said, my quest has been a headless fiver with similar ergonomics and that has been a daunting task. I was lucky enough to speak to Phil Kubicki when he was still in Santa Barbara (...actually, I accidentally dialed his residence). I never fully bought into the 37 lam neck concept but it performed as promised: desired stiffness while removing / relocating deadspots. The proprietary preamp is a strange agent and ended-up in a later Fender Jazz platform. I would not add one as an upgrade to an existing bass.

Riis
 
Okay, more important discoveries. With any active bass I almost always set the EQs to the middle (flat) and then adjust as needed, and the Kubucki was no exception. I’ve been basically only using position 2 (mid boost) with the bass boosted half way center and treble cut half way from center.

I’ve been mostly happy with the tone, but the preamp didn’t behave the way I thought it should. Passive modes were MUCH quieter than active, to the point of being basically unusable without serious changes to my amp levels. Plus it always had a bit of a weird “pushed” kind of sound, as if I had a compressor on, or was running out of headroom or something. Very hard to describe. And position 3 was SUPER scooped sounding with massive amounts of bass, which was also a completely unusual tone for me.

Well upon reading that the EQ was BOOST ONLY I decided to turn them all the way down and start there. Holy moly, what an improvement! I’m now using position 3 and just very slightly boosting treble or bass as needed, but mostly leaving them at 0. No wonder the active modes were so much louder and pushed sounding. I was running it with the bass boosted 3/4 of the way up all the time!

I’m much happier with the tones available in the bass now. It was always good sounding, but now it’s excellent sounding.

I only bought this bass because it was such a good deal, fully expecting to sell it once I got it back up and running again. And despite never being happy with an active bass and always preferring more traditional designs, it’s become my number one player. The playability and ergonomics are just so dialed in and tone is incredibly consistent throughout the whole range of the bass.

Anyone else buy one thinking it was just kind of cool, and then it became your number one?

For better or worse, I think of the passive modes as "backup only". Like you said, you need to re-dial your gain quite substantially. That said, I did have my battery clip fail a while back and (flat) passive mode sounded great. No complaints. For that second active mode with the huge bass, I like that for trying to cop that really deep Sublime bass tone, playing lightly along the end of the fretboard. Maybe even a little "Red, Red, Wine" too.

As to how useful the Kubicki is to me, let's put it this way. I keep it out of the case, right behind me 90% of the time. :bassist:
 
Hey everyone! My name is Blake and I am the arranger and music director of an 80s pop cover band, and we're shooting a video in late January. I know this is a long shot, but I'm hoping to find a good Samaritan who is willing to lend me an 80s bass to use as a prop for the shoot. Details can be found here. To anyone taking the time to take a look, I really appreciate it! :)

80s video shoot prop hunt!
 
Just up on ebay. I played a salmon Ex-Factor in around '94 here in SF at Real Guitars. I would have bought it (under $1k) but I had just bought a black '86 ($750) at Black Market Music (long gone) and so I passed.

 
As an eBay Associate, TalkBass may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
  • Like
Reactions: zuma
Just up on ebay. I played a salmon Ex-Factor in around '94 here in SF at Real Guitars. I would have bought it (under $1k) but I had just bought a black '86 ($750) at Black Market Music (long gone) and so I passed.

Nice! I wonder when the change over from '85 to early '86 happened. This one is dated 4/86 and has the newer control cover. I had seen some '86s with the old cover, but don't recall the date stamp. The earliest ones had a different cover, jack, preamp, and pickups, but you couldn't tell it from the front.
 
As an eBay Associate, TalkBass may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
  • Like
Reactions: JIO and zuma
Nice! I wonder when the change over from '85 to early '86 happened. This one is dated 4/86 and has the newer control cover. I had seen some '86s with the old cover, but don't recall the date stamp. The earliest ones had a different cover, jack, preamp, and pickups, but you couldn't tell it from the front.
As happens, the early days tend to be a time of day-to-day development. I think my '86 was 6/86. I can't recall if mine had the printed bridge-plate or not. It's too bad someone did such a hack-job of touching up the paint, but it can be sanded off and re-buffed to gloss. Factor finishes were very thick so there's plenty of finish to work with.
 
Does anyone recall a posting detailing cap and resistor modifications to the 18v preamp? This new Talkbass format is nearly impossible to search for things buried in the thread. I copied it to text in July of 2023 but would like to read it in the forum to determine the context for which the modifications apply.
Thanks in advance!
 
  • Like
Reactions: zuma
Does your text-only copy show who made the original post?
No, here's the text. Hope it posts. I cant remember the context and I'm not ready to bug Carla about it yet. I'd rather bug you guys.
alright...that didnt work. Lemme try it a different way... Here...

"It was around this time that I noticed that the description of the "9v" preamp used during the Fender Custom Shop period is different than the functions on my preamp. Mine was made in 1988 and is not an FCS. I got curious about the 9v preamp and emailed Carla at Kubicki. What I received was unexpected. She gave me some specific component substitutions that would change the characteristics of the 18v preamp.


C5 - Change to .01uf Mylar or Polyester 35v or > +/- 20% Tolerance
C7 - Remove and leave blank
C14 - Change to .0027uf . Mylar or Polyester 35v or > +/- 20% Tolerance
R20 - Change to 10k All resistors are 1/4 watt 5% carbon film
R25 - Change to 10k
R30 - Change to 100k "
 
  • Like
Reactions: zuma
Does anyone recall a posting detailing cap and resistor modifications to the 18v preamp? This new Talkbass format is nearly impossible to search for things buried in the thread. I copied it to text in July of 2023 but would like to read it in the forum to determine the context for which the modifications apply.
Thanks in advance!
I found this (using Google):
 
  • Like
Reactions: zuma

Latest posts