I assume it was a low cost upgrade. Sounds like a winner to improve the stock 5501...
well I didn't exactly say I payed 2c
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I assume it was a low cost upgrade. Sounds like a winner to improve the stock 5501...
No, I don't, that's the problem. I never dug it in the electronics. The guy that did all this for me lived in Moscow which is like 1 500 miles away and it was back in late 2005.
I'll send a note to the guy who owns the bass currently although I don't know if he can help.
However, I suppose an expert in electronics can find a replacement quite easily if he has the model.
For that price here in the US I'd rather just put a new preamp in there!well I didn't exactly say I payed 2cIt was a hyperbole for "a very cheap item". Actually I paid $100 for all the work and material, but the expence will totally depend on the guy who will do this for you since the material expence is inconsiderable
I just wish there were lakland strings here... i really love the feel of those strings. I'd rather load the strings through the body since i want my notes to last longer hehe.. For now i'll just soak my strings over night in my home made string rejuvinator hehe =)
For that price here in the US I'd rather just put a new preamp in there!
There would be a number on the chip that identifies it.
I actully got them via mail, and you can custom order them from the site. Everyone is saying Lakland have a perfect customer service so you might want to drop a note to them first.
I like it through the body too but, what was meant was: 1) you can use shorter strings; 2) you can intonate strings separately and settle note sustain/precisiness separately on each string.

Thanks for the help guys. I just wish there were lakland strings here... i really love the feel of those strings. I'd rather load the strings through the body since i want my notes to last longer hehe.. For now i'll just soak my strings over night in my home made string rejuvinator hehe =)
My "rejuvenator" is denatured alcohol in a Big Pickle Jar (tm).
It works very well.
second, you'll be surprised but after you pick the string out of the boiking water you can take it with your fingers. Do you remember how Gandalf put The Ring on Frodo's hand right after the fireplace? I guess The Ring was made out of a bass string.
Good thing I plan on replacing the preamp at the end of the summer, huh?
Again, I don't think there's anything wrong with the preamp, but when I install the Audere I'm going to do a full copper foil shielding job.

I would recommend copper shielding for all.
It's much better than shielding paint.
QUOTE]
I respectfully and thoroughly disagree.
I respectfully and thoroughly disagree.
This product:
http://www.stewmac.com/shop/Electronics,_pickups/Supplies:_Shielding/Conductive_Shielding_Paint.html
applied properly is every bit as good as copper foil, and much easier to work with.
Mask off the areas to be painted, put three thin coats on over three days, and reassemble.
Valenti, Sadowsky, and many other high end builders use this very effectively.
The only place I use copper anymore is on the rear of pickguards.
I would recommend copper shielding for all.
It's much better than shielding paint.
QUOTE]
I have a small hum problem and assumed that the paint currently in the 5501 is not adequate.
I've alway used copper effectively and found it easy and quick to apply.
If the Stewmac paint is better, I'm all for it...
Me, I'd rather know for sure. I've got a roll of copper foil tape from Stewmac that has a conductive backing. When it's down I know for sure that it's conductive - plus I like the look of a shiny copper control cavity. I'm going to shield the pickup cavities, control cavity cover, and the back of the pickups too.