• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Lakland or Ibanez?

One of the best sounding and playing instruments I've ever owned was my SR1805. For those who say they don't set in the mix well i think your crazy. Absolutely superb bass that sounds amazing ina full band setting.

753542_bb78f7de77a84720e6a463e4a3b43221.jpg
 
Having played both I would say you can't go wrong with either...depending on your tastes. The Ibanez SR1805E had a very crisp and bright tone compared to a Lakland 55-02 and as has been mentioned the string spacing could be a deciding factor as well. Me? I like the wider spacing and lean towards a more traditional look and sound so the Lakland wins for me. I also don't really dig gold hardware.
Well I don't like bright toned basses. Like I said before I had a SBMM Ray35 and got rid of it due to the bright tone of the MM pickup. Can the brightness be EQ'ed out?
 
I have 3 Skyline Laklands and have contemplated a Premium series Ibanez as well. Here's what it comes down to: The Lakland 55-02 is a little more of a "traditional" style bass, while the Ibanez SR1805E is its own beast. The Lakland will be able to reproduce several well known tones, has a larger body, a 35" scale, and a neck that is thinner than a Fender but not as small as a Ibanez neck. The Nordstrand Big Singles in the Ibanez are great sounding pickups, and fairly versatile, but they won't (IMO) give you a P, Jazz, or MM tone. The Necks and bodies of Ibanez basses are notorious slim, which for a smaller guy like me is a plus, but for others might feel funny. The one thing I really have against the Ibanez is that it seems to disappear quickly into the mix. If you are looking for a something that sticks out, it isn't a good choice.
I had a SR405 and it did get lost in the mix from time to time, but surely not with a $1400 SR premium bass?
 
Skylines are nice basses in my experience, but if you're looking for a thin neck like the Ibanez SR series typically has I don't think you'll find it on a Lakland. I have a 44-64 custom, so I can't speak for the 55-02 but the neck on mine is basically a Jazz neck.
Well I had a SR405 and still to this day it was the best bass I have ever played. I've owned a SBMM Ray35, P basses, J basses, Ibby BTB basses and none of them played better than the SR405 that I had. The sound was a little thin on the 405, but I don't expect it to sound thin on the SR premium bass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: irjason
Well I don't like bright toned basses. Like I said before I had a SBMM Ray35 and got rid of it due to the bright tone of the MM pickup. Can the brightness be EQ'ed out?
The preamp is very capable of various tones and the right strings could keep you out of the too-bright territory. Your playing style will contribute alot to the aggressiveness of the sound you get as well. It's not all about the bass! Listen up:

 
Its going to be a tough choice! I like the looks of the SR1805 better, but the Lakland looks great as well. I will have to say I do prefer a more traditional bass sound (all the basses that I have owned and I have just a P-bass). There is something about the Lakland though, I can't put my finger on it, but it just looks like a more professional bass compared to the Ibby.
 
How does the basses sound compared to a premium ibby?
The 55-60 & 55-64s cop that old school Fender tone primarily. The 55-01 with active pre can get a wide variety of tones. The two Ibbys I owned (SR1405 & SR5 LTD) had the same pre and IMO was the weakest part of the instrument. I thought the tone sounded anemic on the Ibbys. I could get a usable tone but it seemed a lot of work. I prefer not to have to work that hard to get a tone I like. Not the case with the Laklands.

Also I didn't like the narrow string spacing.
 
Last edited: