• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

LAKLAND OWNERS GROUP #26

Status
Not open for further replies.
I remember (before getting my 1st Lakland) NOT digging the 55 body shape's looks. But, the features and reputation drew me in. I agreed to buy my 55-94 without having ever seen or played a Lakland. It took about 2 seconds in my hands, to totally fall in love w/ the bass. Now, I can't remember why I didn't dig the body shape.
IMG_2665.jpg

I felt the same about the DJ5's shape. Bought one off the 'bay and fell in love, wish I coulda kept it and wired it in series.
IMG_1861-1-1.jpg

The JO5.... I've always loved it's looks! Miss that bass too!
IMG_1887.jpg


:bawl: where's my kleenex :bawl:

Nice Jody!!! I LOVE the Banana cream!

BTW - got somehting you would like to share??? Hmmmmm????

I talked to Leo....I know a secret!!!!
 
It's funny you say that because almost as soon as I posted that remark I looked at pics of mine and other 55's and I questioned myself. I think the lower horn just looks a bit short, but I think that's why it's as comfy as it is and access to high frets is great, unlike a J style 5 (my other bass).

I like the lower horn. It certainly looks shorter if you put a 94 against a MMSR but, as it is, somehow the guys managed to make the shape very organic. To say nothing of the higher frets access - it's perfect! Better access to the 22th fret than my former neck-through 24-fret Ibby!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.