• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

LAKLAND OWNERS GROUP #46

Status
Not open for further replies.
No I'VE been eslapped.....and rightly so.

Bryan...will try to curb my posting and make it more efficient....I guesss this marks the end of the wave!

me too... I admit I have a pocket-size time -machine so I reply to posts that have been posted pages ago.
I try to multi-quote. But being in the other hemisphere means that, by the time I get to read and reply, there's hundreds of unread posts. Like today, it is over 7 pages (##45 and 46 together), which equals to almost 150 posts. Sometimes it is more than 10 pages. Multiquoting sometimes becomes an issue.
 
D'Addario Chrome Flats
Originally Posted by bamabass
Have you tried Chromes on Nessie?


Originally Posted by bamabass
If you want more highs, I would say try chrome flats. They kill.

Originally Posted by bamabass
I use D'addario....


I was given a used 4-strings D'Addario Chrome flats to try on. I haven't yet but what caught my attention is:
- the front side of the pack says WARM/MELLOW;
- the tone chart on the back says Chrome Flats are the least bright of all strings shown (however, there are rounds in the chart as well).
So now I'm curious and will try them on once I bring my Ampeg back home.

However, only one local shop has 5 string set of D'Addario flats, and those are, according to what they told me on the phone, not Chromes but Nickel/Steels. The thing is, they cost almost $50. OUCH!!! :eek::eyebrow::rollno::scowl:/Horizontal Totem Pole of Disbelief, Disapproval And Then Some Disgust/

Nessie and GHS Bright Flats
Last night I played a rehearsal with Nessie loaded with GHS Bright Flats (ground roundwound) set M3075. Basically that means I had 4 flat strings and a round B string from the original Lakland steels set. :)
I liked the highs with that setting but I find that the A and E strings have more "life" in the Lakland steels. Couldn't compare the B string for obvious reasons.
I'm new to fretless and fresh new to flats so, has anyone but me felt like the flats need noticeably less precision than rounds to fret? It seems like they make it sound more "even", more tolerable or something
 
Denis: not sure that D'addario makes any other flats besides Chromes... so I'm puzzled. But, either way, pay whatever it costs! They only get better w/ age.... you'll use the same set for many years.

And Markus: love the new avatar pic! And the "Willis" comment is funny too. But... feel sad that Gary C is gone. :(
 
Still learning here so forgive me (first off, is it proper form to post BEFORE or AFTER the Quote in a multi-tsunami?)

Sorry I get you so lost JJ! just gotta speed read!!!

+infinity, but I'm still FOR multiquoting.

Yeah, I have to skim A LOT sometimes, and get lost... but I'm definitely as guilty as the next guy for OT stuff.

Yup.....maybe at times....but, like today, I came up to a good stopping point....well, at least a good time to break the multi-quote...

Here is your useful Lkaland info RIGHT HERE! (oops sorry - OT!)

That could end up being a page or 2 in it's self! :help:

And you know it'll be chalk full of very useful Lakland information! ;)

Evan, we have been trying to make that break between the 2 sites for some time now......lets make a concerted effort to keep bass talk here and "fun" there.....oh - and technical issues etc!

As for the wait.....good luck! 3-4 weeks? at least you are going to practice....I am on line and SHOULD be practicing!

I've felt that this has been the reason for the LOG Site. Bass talk here, LOG stuff there. A balancing act it is, but achievable it may be...

Anyways... the bass has only shipped today and I can not wait for it to be back. I'm going to crawl back into my hole and practice.

Nope - I guess it will just be a different format......

laklandowners.com? what is that? (oops sorry - another worthless OT comment!)

The end of the Doude Wave? :crying:

However, to those that suggest a subforum for the LOG, may I remind you of laklandowners.com

:)

EDIT: I'm guilty of time travel. I probably should have read through the thread first huh :p

Now bring on the (next) Multi-Nami!

1) Me too....

2) unless it is one uber hawt bass that is!

No Pics No Ferg! :D I love the Pics

I do HATE when the same pic is quoted 10 times...
 
:crying:

it only got played by a little old lady in church!

glad you like it! Sorry - this is WORTHY of repeat pics!

Sorry folks, this doesn't happen to me often.
After two weeks of scheduling problems, and three hours in traffic to my favorite state (NOT!!!!), I finally picked up Amber.
Doug....did you ever play this thing?
Its like showroom new. I love that new bass smell.
I'll be honest, I wanted to see the former Blondie since her facelift I didn't even look at Amber there.
I did not really see her till I got her home.
This thing is......Just look for yourselves

123_1308.gif


Amber and Bob
123_1306.gif


SCHWING!!!!!!
 
congrats Randy! we can do this together.....I do not even think there is a multiquote ability at the LOG site....not YET anyways!

And - I think we ARE good for TB no matter what is said!

I SERIOUSLY get confused in multi-quotes.... but look at me, I just did my FIRST EVER multi-quote!

JJ - I agree....the Bob and Amber show.....

Wow, Amber n Bob make a HOT couple!! Congrats!

He he ....you and me both my friend! especially with the way I travel and have limited post time at times....gotta make it count when I can...

me too... I admit I have a pocket-size time -machine so I reply to posts that have been posted pages ago.
I try to multi-quote. But being in the other hemisphere means that, by the time I get to read and reply, there's hundreds of unread posts. Like today, it is over 7 pages (##45 and 46 together), which equals to almost 150 posts. Sometimes it is more than 10 pages. Multiquoting sometimes becomes an issue.

yupper....

I feel your pain bro

PS - sorrry for the lack of useful info......Markus and I are just the comedy relief here....remember - we know NOTHING about laklands since we are "collectors" and not playas!:scowl:

PPS - only up to post 67???? I feel like a mini-marathon already!
 
I find it most helpful to read if you respond after the post, otherwise it's like watchin Jepordy. :D

Same here.

I'll jump on the multi-quote train when I decide to post here, but for me, they're just harder to read, and seem highly impersonal....

Certainly hard to read when the response to the quote precedes the quote. Not yet sure about the other order.

Andy
 
I don't think anyone said that this thread is "not good for TB" but when the thread gets bumped often by off-topic chatter, other threads with discussion on Basses get bumped down. Other members have complained about this. Multiquoting is not a forum rule, but please use your best judgment about responding (and think about other members of TB who are also interested in other threads).

For example, when a user responds to every single post (substantive or not) that took place after his or her last one in separate posts, often in one word replies, it does not strike me as necessary. It serves to bury other threads in the forum and boost individual post count but doesn't inform people who are genuinely interested in Laklands. The thread becomes filled with more filler posts than actual posts related to basses.

In that kind of situation, multiquoting (or simply not responding to everybody) seems like a good idea to me. When responding substantively to different questions or topics, I can see where it makes more sense to respond in separate posts. I think this type of consideration will also make these threads more readable, which is something members have complained about previously.

Since this post is not bass-related and since off-topic chatter posts are discouraged in the Basses forum rules (see here) please, let's get back to discussion of Lakland Basses. As always, feel free to write any of the forum mods or admins with concerns. :cool:
 
I'll jump on the multi-quote train when I decide to post here, but for me, they're just harder to read, and seem highly impersonal....

harder to read - yes! I agree....(posting AFTER the quote for a more un-jeopardy like manner!)

Yes, kinda feels like corporate cattle herding.

LOL! MOO!!!

I don't think anyone said that this thread is "not good for TB" but when the thread gets bumped often by off-topic chatter, other threads with discussion on Basses get bumped down. Other members have complained about this. Multiquoting is not a forum rule, but please use your best judgment about responding (and think about other members of TB who are also interested in other threads).

For example, when a user responds to every single post (substantive or not) that took place after his or her last one in separate posts, often in one word replies, it does not strike me as necessary. It serves to bury other threads in the forum and boost individual post count but doesn't inform people who are genuinely interested in Laklands. The thread becomes filled with more filler posts than actual posts related to basses.

In that kind of situation, multiquoting (or simply not responding to everybody) seems like a good idea to me. When responding substantively to different questions or topics, I can see where it makes more sense to respond in separate posts. I think this type of consideration will also make these threads more readable, which is something members have complained about previously.

Since this post is not bass-related and since off-topic chatter posts are discouraged in the Basses forum rules (see here) please, let's get back to discussion of Lakland Basses. As always, feel free to write any of the forum mods or admins with concerns. :cool:

Will try to use my discretion.....
 
I don't think anyone said that this thread is "not good for TB" but when the thread gets bumped often by off-topic chatter, other threads with discussion on Basses get bumped down. Other members have complained about this. Multiquoting is not a forum rule, but please use your best judgment about responding (and think about other members of TB who are also interested in other threads).

For example, when a user responds to every single post (substantive or not) that took place after his or her last one in separate posts, often in one word replies, it does not strike me as necessary. It serves to bury other threads in the forum and boost individual post count but doesn't inform people who are genuinely interested in Laklands. The thread becomes filled with more filler posts than actual posts related to basses.

In that kind of situation, multiquoting (or simply not responding to everybody) seems like a good idea to me. When responding substantively to different questions or topics, I can see where it makes more sense to respond in separate posts. I think this type of consideration will also make these threads more readable, which is something members have complained about previously.

Since this post is not bass-related and since off-topic chatter posts are discouraged in the Basses forum rules (see here) please, let's get back to discussion of Lakland Basses. As always, feel free to write any of the forum mods or admins with concerns. :cool:

Thanks man!
 
I'm new to fretless and fresh new to flats so, has anyone but me felt like the flats need noticeably less precision than rounds to fret? It seems like they make it sound more "even", more tolerable or something
I agree, Denis--flats feel that way to me, too. They're a little more forgiving of my left-hand technique. On the other hand, I find I need to focus a little more than usual on right-hand touch and timing, because the notes are shorter and fatter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.