• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

LAKLAND OWNERS GROUP #48

Status
Not open for further replies.
hi everyone! hope everything's well with you guys

wow Aaron. There's A LOT going on in your avatar

I recently interchanged the necks between my 55-s, so former Nessie is currently a black / maple fretted now. That's a hell to the yeah of a "rhythm bass" if you know what I mean.
I've also found she's very precise and fast: I've been fooling around doing Alexi Laiho-like (yeah right! me sore wannabe:rollno:) 16ths and 32ths chops, and every note just stands out, something I've never felt on a passive bass, at least to this extent.
Still, passive, alder, and bridge CS pickup is not my cup of tea. I need more, more, more highs! Since everyone is so hyped about the chis lately, wanna trade bodies for smth.? a US P5 would be fantastic... /sigh/

Also, I found out the 2001 neck is just a notch wider than the 2009 neck. I also feel that the 2009 neck feels a bit thinner. Has anyone noticed the same or that is personal of each instrument?





... also, the appearance of a Copter Black 55-94 is the only reason to watch that Putin vid... but rest assured that I've already sent the vid to a number of bassists LOL

/Copter Black, huh? sounds like a name for premium-grade color scheme.

He he he! Hey Comrad! Yeah..I wonder how you would like an ash bass with ChiSonics. Thinking the mid scoop nature would give you more pronounced highs. I know my ash JO Cs has plenty-o-highs.
 
I see where you're coming from... Interestingly enough, I never went into the VT Bass world wanting any sort of 'Ampeg' character, even though that's apparently what it was intended to do. I learned that after the fact. I bought it because I wanted the supposed 'tube warmth' inherent in it (Ampeg comparisons/simulations aside) and now I can't get away from it. I fell in love with it as a result. I set it as 'flat' as possible (for the 'B-15' vibe I guess) and tweak from there with onboard EQ. I do tend to cut a LOT of the highs out of it though. I notice that upper-mid 'clank' at times but I find that through a combo of very small onboard EQ and amp tweaks in conjunction with the VT I can get something that works quite well for me. My amp setup is usually an Eden head of some sort into SWR cabs, so I'm tweaking an already 'hi-fi'/warm hybrid type of amp setup anyway. Every time I try other upper-mid 'massaging' (even with LH-3 onboard tweaks on my 44-02) I lose some of the bite that I love, and I hate adding treble for clarity. Sends me into sizzle territory and I'm not a fan of sizzle. I've never tried a Tone Hammer though... sounds like I may have something else to GAS over soon. Does it offer tube character/coloration without the 'Ampeg' vibe?

+1 to that. Although personally, I've been through two VT's now. They do cut the glassy highs, but they also add a somewhat clanky upper-mid (for my tastes that is) that I just couldn't ever dial out. I think they're great for people who want that Ampeg tone though, but that's never really been my objective. The Tone Hammer leans more towards a neutral tone when engaged rather than an instant coloration. Depending on people's tone goals, I usually steer them toward one or the other depending on what they are after. Both can provide a nice vintage tone and feel. I recommended it above because he mentioned simply controlling highs a good bit without really going for any particular amp/cabinet simulation. But you're definitely right. YMMV on my advice as well!
 
I see where you're coming from... Interestingly enough, I never went into the VT Bass world wanting any sort of 'Ampeg' character, even though that's apparently what it was intended to do. I learned that after the fact. I bought it because I wanted the supposed 'tube warmth' inherent in it (Ampeg comparisons/simulations aside) and now I can't get away from it. I fell in love with it as a result. I set it as 'flat' as possible (for the 'B-15' vibe I guess) and tweak from there with onboard EQ.
That makes sense. I'm not a fan of the B-15 tone for most things I do, though I do love it on all those old vintage Motown recordings. It is a very warm sound, and the VT does a fairly good job of emulating I would agree.

I do tend to cut a LOT of the highs out of it though. I notice that upper-mid 'clank' at times but I find that through a combo of very small onboard EQ and amp tweaks in conjunction with the VT I can get something that works quite well for me.
I don't want to talk bad about a pedal you love, so I hope you view my comments as just that...comments. I'm not sure if you've followed any of the VT threads around here, but a few people scoped that VT, and there is no "flat" setting on it necessarily. The flattest anyone got it was with the lows and mids just past noon, and highs around 10 o'clock. It still had a curve that favored the upper-mids a bit, and the rig emulation adds a bit of bite in that region as well. That's what provides that grindy snap up top. But hey, that's what an Ampeg does so good job by Tech21 in recreating it! My problem was that I use a lot of passive instruments with no tone controls, so I couldn't really dial that upper mid out any further. The PTC knob worked but it made the total sound too dark. Most of my playing is direct into a PA with no bass head, so I was left with no control over the sound. I didn't want to have to use an EQ pedal so I just gave up on the VT for my needs. Others would love it, so I'm really not dogging it. It was just a personal preference for me.

Every time I try other upper-mid 'massaging' (even with LH-3 onboard tweaks on my 44-02) I lose some of the bite that I love, and I hate adding treble for clarity. Sends me into sizzle territory and I'm not a fan of sizzle.
This part I totally get. Adding more treble doesn't accomplish the same thing. The VT sometimes was perfect for that bite, especially on a grindy J bass with a pick. It was great for those kinds of tunes, but that's such a small part of my needs. Not being able to avoid it for the majority of my playing was a detraction.

I've never tried a Tone Hammer though... sounds like I may have something else to GAS over soon. Does it offer tube character/coloration without the 'Ampeg' vibe?
Yes, it does just that, although calling something tubey seems to mean different things to different folks around here. If you've played a lot of old tube heads, then you know there's lots of room for variation. Traynor vs. Ampeg vs. Hiwatt for example. All extremely different. The Tone Hammer, with the AGS off, is an almost completely transparent active EQ section with cut/boost and sweeping mids. The AGS circuit is an interactive control. As soon as you engage it, it rolls of highs even at the lowest setting, so it sounds vintage right off the bat, but it doesn't change the character of your bass. There is no "emulation" going on. So it warms things up right off the bat. The EQ still works the same, but the frequency points are different with the AGS engaged. Rolling up highs doesn't add sizzle, but upper-mid bite in the 2k-3k area it seems. So you can dial in that kind of grind. The bass knob is also tighter, so you're dialing in lower-mids rather than extended bass so that the result is more like the tone of a sealed 810 cabinet. It's very cool.

Taking it further, as you increase the gain with the AGS engaged, it begins to add more and more warmth, or harmonic content. Eventually it starts to overdrive and get increasingly snarly. The signal is also compressed more as this occurs, just like you'd expect when overdriving a tube amp. Going back to what I said before, the AGS circuit is very interactive with the EQ, so the more you turn it up, the more the low-end tightens up and becomes more focussed to keep the tone from getting muddy. The treble also smooths out so that it doesn't instantly become a buzz saw just because you are pushing the overdrive really hard. Of course, you can boost lows and treble to get that, but it's not automatic which is nice.

Here's the other thing about the AGS. It interacts specifically with the mid control. In other words, that's where it does it's thing. So by setting the gain for a certain amount of overdrive, tweaking the mid control changes the "character" of the effect. But the gotcha is that it also changes the amount of overdrive once you start tweaking the mid, so you might have to back off a bit. It's highly flexible but it can take some noodling just to figure out how it all works together.

A lot of folks around here have nit-picked Aguilar over the Tone Hammer not having two independent level controls so that you can set the output of the AGS tone to match the output of the clean tone, which would essentially make it a two channel pedal. I can understand them because that would make the pedal that much more versatile so that some could also use it as a stomp-box distortion, but because of the way the EQ interacts with the AGS, the chances are that the EQ settings for the clean tone wouldn't really work for the AGS tone for lots of folks. I know they wouldn't for me. I pretty much run my bass flat in the clean mode, and then tweak the EQ for the AGS tone.

One more quick note. The NICE thing about the AGS is that if you set the gain completely counter clockwise and adjust the Level for unity response, then engaging the AGS provides no boost in output. It also doesn't change the EQ functions much at that lower setting. The end result is that engaging the AGS when it is set like this has the effect of simply rolling off all that high end that a lot of vintage players don't like. It sounds almost JUST like turning the tweeter off on a modern cab simply by stepping on the AGS button. Very cool, and that's how I tend to use it, with just a bit of EQ on a passive instrument. Engage the AGS, boost the gain to around 9 o'clock (very slight grit), and then boost the treble to add a touch of upper-mid bite but NO sizzle.

Hope that helps! And sorry for the derail everyone!
 
That makes sense. I'm not a fan of the B-15 tone for most things I do, though I do love it on all those old vintage Motown recordings. It is a very warm sound, and the VT does a fairly good job of emulating I would agree.

I don't want to talk bad about a pedal you love, so I hope you view my comments as just that...comments. I'm not sure if you've followed any of the VT threads around here, but a few people scoped that VT, and there is no "flat" setting on it necessarily. The flattest anyone got it was with the lows and mids just past noon, and highs around 10 o'clock. It still had a curve that favored the upper-mids a bit, and the rig emulation adds a bit of bite in that region as well. That's what provides that grindy snap up top. But hey, that's what an Ampeg does so good job by Tech21 in recreating it! My problem was that I use a lot of passive instruments with no tone controls, so I couldn't really dial that upper mid out any further. The PTC knob worked but it made the total sound too dark. Most of my playing is direct into a PA with no bass head, so I was left with no control over the sound. I didn't want to have to use an EQ pedal so I just gave up on the VT for my needs. Others would love it, so I'm really not dogging it. It was just a personal preference for me.

This part I totally get. Adding more treble doesn't accomplish the same thing. The VT sometimes was perfect for that bite, especially on a grindy J bass with a pick. It was great for those kinds of tunes, but that's such a small part of my needs. Not being able to avoid it for the majority of my playing was a detraction.

Yes, it does just that, although calling something tubey seems to mean different things to different folks around here. If you've played a lot of old tube heads, then you know there's lots of room for variation. Traynor vs. Ampeg vs. Hiwatt for example. All extremely different. The Tone Hammer, with the AGS off, is an almost completely transparent active EQ section with cut/boost and sweeping mids. The AGS circuit is an interactive control. As soon as you engage it, it rolls of highs even at the lowest setting, so it sounds vintage right off the bat, but it doesn't change the character of your bass. There is no "emulation" going on. So it warms things up right off the bat. The EQ still works the same, but the frequency points are different with the AGS engaged. Rolling up highs doesn't add sizzle, but upper-mid bite in the 2k-3k area it seems. So you can dial in that kind of grind. The bass knob is also tighter, so you're dialing in lower-mids rather than extended bass so that the result is more like the tone of a sealed 810 cabinet. It's very cool.

Taking it further, as you increase the gain with the AGS engaged, it begins to add more and more warmth, or harmonic content. Eventually it starts to overdrive and get increasingly snarly. The signal is also compressed more as this occurs, just like you'd expect when overdriving a tube amp. Going back to what I said before, the AGS circuit is very interactive with the EQ, so the more you turn it up, the more the low-end tightens up and becomes more focussed to keep the tone from getting muddy. The treble also smooths out so that it doesn't instantly become a buzz saw just because you are pushing the overdrive really hard. Of course, you can boost lows and treble to get that, but it's not automatic which is nice.

Here's the other thing about the AGS. It interacts specifically with the mid control. In other words, that's where it does it's thing. So by setting the gain for a certain amount of overdrive, tweaking the mid control changes the "character" of the effect. But the gotcha is that it also changes the amount of overdrive once you start tweaking the mid, so you might have to back off a bit. It's highly flexible but it can take some noodling just to figure out how it all works together.

A lot of folks around here have nit-picked Aguilar over the Tone Hammer not having two independent level controls so that you can set the output of the AGS tone to match the output of the clean tone, which would essentially make it a two channel pedal. I can understand them because that would make the pedal that much more versatile so that some could also use it as a stomp-box distortion, but because of the way the EQ interacts with the AGS, the chances are that the EQ settings for the clean tone wouldn't really work for the AGS tone for lots of folks. I know they wouldn't for me. I pretty much run my bass flat in the clean mode, and then tweak the EQ for the AGS tone.

One more quick note. The NICE thing about the AGS is that if you set the gain completely counter clockwise and adjust the Level for unity response, then engaging the AGS provides no boost in output. It also doesn't change the EQ functions much at that lower setting. The end result is that engaging the AGS when it is set like this has the effect of simply rolling off all that high end that a lot of vintage players don't like. It sounds almost JUST like turning the tweeter off on a modern cab simply by stepping on the AGS button. Very cool, and that's how I tend to use it, with just a bit of EQ on a passive instrument. Engage the AGS, boost the gain to around 9 o'clock (very slight grit), and then boost the treble to add a touch of upper-mid bite but NO sizzle.

Hope that helps! And sorry for the derail everyone!

Wow, that makes me wann gas for one!
 
At the risk of a further derail, here are some samples: [Invalid or Expired Link Removed] A few of them are with a Darryl Jones bass!

To keep this somewhat on subject, the Tone Hammer is AWESOME with all Laklands, passive or active. With the DJ's, they provided the ability to get a super modern tone when run without the AGS. The treble boost can be nice and sizzly even though it's set at 4k. Cutting mids or low-mids was a cinch with the semi-parametric EQ. Just wonderful sounding...not that the DJ's needed much help though! Running the AGS with very little overdrive was incredible sounding with my Duck Dunn strung with rounds. It took that sizzle off the top without having to put flats on, but it still had enough up there to let the bass speak really well in a mix. The Dunn slap tone through the AGS was very addictive, and I'm not really a slapper at all.

With my 55/44-02's, the Tone Hammer is cool because now I don't have to fiddle with the internal mid setting of the LH3. I just keep mine at the factory default, and use the Tone Hammer when I need low-mids boosted or that 1khz cut. And again, the AGS for reigning in those sizzly highs is a necessity for me, especially for my in-ear gigs where the sizzle is really noticeable.

Lakland plus Tone Hammer = extreme flexibility IMHO. YMMV!
 
Hey all! Not LOG bass related but I'm expecting a new Skyline LE Teal Green Bob Glaub from Bass Central by Wednesday...I'm psyched and pics will follow. Really curious to see how the Hansons sound as they are wound a bit hotter (11k?) compared to the Fralins I'm used to in my Fender. I hate waiting for UPS!

congrats!!!!

The pickup you are referring to, this is just the standard Lakland P pickup, correct? That is what I had in my Dunn, and I would agree that it was a bit more aggressive sounding than an old vintage Precision bass, but still had that chunky mid profile. Do you know how the Nordy compares? I've heard it more of a vintage thing which I'm interested in trying. I wouldn't mind if it sounded just like the Hanson pickup myself though.

I would agree....I have Nordies in my PJ and have tied all 3 options (Nordy, Hanson Neo and Hanson Vintage).

the order of "moderness" and aggressiveness (IMHO) is:

Hanson Vintage (pretty Fralin sounding)
Nordy
Neo Punch
 
They honestly don't sound different enough that I'd care which an axe came with. Not saying it doesn't sound *good,* just saying that maybe the choices aren't really all that different from one another. At least, not to matter in any situation where there would be other instruments and non-bass players listening.

who cares what "non-bass players" think (he he!)...WE Care and I can hear a diffenece...I think the difference is more pronounced live....

The Vintage is more mellow and thicker.

The Neos remind me more of what I hear from Sadowskys etc.....more modern and bright...
 
....anticipation is already HIGH! I know I am getting more anxious as the days go forward.....[


QUOTE=Eublet;10221680]Thanks, guys. I'll look up that thread at the LOG and see what I can find.

On a sidenote, in anticipation of the LOG bass arriving, I listened to some Chickenfoot on my iPod this morning when I was at the gym. I'm not sure exactly what bass Anthony used on those recordings, but it's definitely in the P bass family. It sounded great and only makes the anticipation of this bass all the greater.[/QUOTE]
 
Denis:

long time buddy!

glad to hear you have been having fun with Nessie....so know which bass has the fretless neck?

wanna have more fun? check out the "2010 - year of GAS" thread on the LOG.....recounts of many LOGgers ownership throoughout 2010...some very intresting stories there!

"Copter Black"....LOVE the idea....as long as the government does not already have it copywritten....of course...the bass would not be visible to most people....

hi everyone! hope everything's well with you guys

wow Aaron. There's A LOT going on in your avatar

I recently interchanged the necks between my 55-s, so former Nessie is currently a black / maple fretted now. That's a hell to the yeah of a "rhythm bass" if you know what I mean.
I've also found she's very precise and fast: I've been fooling around doing Alexi Laiho-like (yeah right! me sore wannabe:rollno:) 16ths and 32ths chops, and every note just stands out, something I've never felt on a passive bass, at least to this extent.
Still, passive, alder, and bridge CS pickup is not my cup of tea. I need more, more, more highs! Since everyone is so hyped about the chis lately, wanna trade bodies for smth.? a US P5 would be fantastic... /sigh/

Also, I found out the 2001 neck is just a notch wider than the 2009 neck. I also feel that the 2009 neck feels a bit thinner. Has anyone noticed the same or that is personal of each instrument?





... also, the appearance of a Copter Black 55-94 is the only reason to watch that Putin vid... but rest assured that I've already sent the vid to a number of bassists LOL

/Copter Black, huh? sounds like a name for premium-grade color scheme.
 
Not all of us. Currently trying to eliminate zing from my newly acquired 55-02 (Lakland pickups, factory steel round wounds). Next step ... nickels. If that fails, half-rounds or tapes :)

Andy

I LIKE my highs.....maybe my "higher register" is gone from all of my loud music from high school etc....or maybe the job (I work alot in manufacturing facilities and noise is always a problem)

Yeah...I think nickels will help. Worn in Chromes might do the trick too.

Nickels will help ALOT.....Chromes as well....I only have Chromes on one bass and the "zing" is definately gone from it...
 
YOU have an Ipod? I thought Michael Anthony used a Music Man Sterling?

....anticipation is already HIGH! I know I am getting more anxious as the days go forward.....[


QUOTE=Eublet;10221680]Thanks, guys. I'll look up that thread at the LOG and see what I can find.

On a sidenote, in anticipation of the LOG bass arriving, I listened to some Chickenfoot on my iPod this morning when I was at the gym. I'm not sure exactly what bass Anthony used on those recordings, but it's definitely in the P bass family. It sounded great and only makes the anticipation of this bass all the greater.
[/QUOTE]
 
YOU have an Ipod? I thought Michael Anthony used a Music Man Sterling?
I've got one of those little mini, micro iPods or whatever. It's perfect for exercising with as it's not heavy enough to bounce around or get in the way.

As for Anthony, he has a lot of basses from what I've seen that he rotates around, but his two signature basses are P/J's made by Yamaha. They sound great, though I'm not crazy about the look. He seems to prefer the P pickup most of the time I've seen/heard him. The Chickenfoot album is a bit of a throwback for me to earlier days. I'm not necessarily crazy about listening to it, but on the iPod with some good canal phones, you can really hear the bass. I used to kind of dog Anthony's playing, rather foolishly, many years ago, but he has a very tasteful approach on the Chickenfoot album that I just enjoy listening to. It's worth checking out if you are an 80's/90's hard rock kinda guy.

And that's derail number two for me. I'm going to get banned at this rate! LOL!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts