[/QUOTE]YOU have an Ipod? I thought Michael Anthony used a Music Man Sterling?
He uses a Yamaha I believe.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
[/QUOTE]YOU have an Ipod? I thought Michael Anthony used a Music Man Sterling?
OH wow Trevor!!!! very cool! Is that Pat's work?
Nah, a buddy of mine did it over the christmas break using ReRanch. it's a bit rough in some areas but nothing that i'm worried about. she just needs new strings and then i'll resume playing the crap outta her!!
It has a drive section but it remains to be seen what it will behave like. From the looks of the front panel, there is no engage/disengage for the drive, simply a knob that you turn up or down. So I'm wondering if it'll have the same roll-off of the highs. Also, Dave B. at Aguilar did say that this won't have the same amount of overdrive capability as the Tone Hammer pedal, but rather more of a vintage grit.Great information!
Does the TH500 have AGS?
He uses a Yamaha I believe.
who cares what "non-bass players" think (he he!)...WE Care and I can hear a diffenece...I think the difference is more pronounced live....
The Vintage is more mellow and thicker.
The Neos remind me more of what I hear from Sadowskys etc.....more modern and bright...
Is that a correct way to say 'don't mess with well-done things or you'll spoil them, you imbecile!"?Sounds like you're doing some interesting things with your Lakies.
well, technically, I did listen to Mark King. But since Andy claims that not all of us did yet, I have to go now and make sure all the rest do their homework. Ought I kill those who wouldn't listen to King, sir?It seems like European players really like their zing. Did you all listen to too much Mark King?![]()
yep, the LH-3 is zingy. But, with that flexible of a preamp, I think you could get the work done. Did you fiddle with the internal switches? Maybe accenting the low-mids could work for you? Sorry, I don't have the idea of the sound you're after.Not all of us. Currently trying to eliminate zing from my newly acquired 55-02 (Lakland pickups, factory steel round wounds). Next step ... nickels. If that fails, half-rounds or tapes![]()
that, and a LH-3 stompbox maybe. BTW, any news on its color scheme?He he he! Hey Comrad! Yeah..I wonder how you would like an ash bass with ChiSonics. Thinking the mid scoop nature would give you more pronounced highs. I know my ash JO Cs has plenty-o-highs.
Flatwounds, babyyyyyyyyy!!!![]()
That's interesting. Nessie was a fretless and I was running around looking for bright flatwounds or halfrounds.If I wasn't talking about a fretless bass, I might agree with you. Given it's fretless, my goals are slightly different.
the One and Only Standard Semi-Custom Bartolini LH-3 55-94 Decade Plusglad to hear you have been having fun with Nessie....so know which bass has the fretless neck?
Sure thing! Will do!wanna have more fun? check out the "2010 - year of GAS" thread on the LOG.....recounts of many LOGgers ownership throoughout 2010...some very intresting stories there!
yep, the LH-3 is zingy. But, with that flexible of a preamp, I think you could get the work done.
Did you fiddle with the internal switches? Maybe accenting the low-mids could work for you? Sorry, I don't have the idea of the sound you're after.
Also, you may wanna find and install a set of Barts, the contrary of what I did to my other 55-94 to get more highs. They do change the picture drastically. Sometimes you can get them used here in the Classifieds or at bassgear.com
I wanted to mention something else I've used with great success with my 44/55 series basses to tame highs. If you have the mid frequency at the default position of 600 hz, then this works really well. I cut bass and mids back to around 9 o'clock. That means they're pointing almost directly toward the back of the bass. Then roll highs off to taste. Since the treble is centered at 3 khz, this will pull a lot of top end out pretty quickly, but it'll leave a lot of that bite in the 2khz range. Actually, it seems to create a bit of a bump there since I'm also cutting mids and lows. It works VERY well when running these basses in "jazz" mode. After that, I simply adjust the lows to taste, maybe boosting them back up just a touch if necessary. You can even cut the highs completely off when doing this and it removes a lot of that sizzle, but since the lows and mids are also cut it doesn't result in a muted tone.Not all of us. Currently trying to eliminate zing from my newly acquired 55-02 (Lakland pickups, factory steel round wounds). Next step ... nickels. If that fails, half-rounds or tapes![]()
Andy
I wanted to mention something else I've used with great success with my 44/55 series basses to tame highs. If you have the mid frequency at the default position of 600 hz, then this works really well. I cut bass and mids back to around 9 o'clock. That means they're pointing almost directly toward the back of the bass. Then roll highs off to taste. Since the treble is centered at 3 khz, this will pull a lot of top end out pretty quickly, but it'll leave a lot of that bite in the 2khz range. Actually, it seems to create a bit of a bump there since I'm also cutting mids and lows. It works VERY well when running these basses in "jazz" mode. After that, I simply adjust the lows to taste, maybe boosting them back up just a touch if necessary. You can even cut the highs completely off when doing this and it removes a lot of that sizzle, but since the lows and mids are also cut it doesn't result in a muted tone.
It might work for you.
Perhaps, but considering that it's always better to cut than boost it makes sense. Boosting can also add noise, and it removes headroom from a preamp that's only running at 9v. I think you might be surprised how well this little experiment works in a live setting. Sometimes I run both lows and mids at 10 o'clock, which is a little higher, and cut highs almost completely off. The result is a tight, punchy bottom with plenty of warm mids, and a slightly snarly presence with very little sizzle. When combined with nickel strings, it really brings that Jazz bass tone out of these basses when you tap that rear coil. Favoring the front pickup ever so slightly also fattens things up a bit.Sounds counter-intuitive, but I'll give it a shot. Thanks.
LOG Basses are in!!!!!!!!
Sometimes I run both lows and mids at 10 o'clock, which is a little higher, and cut highs almost completely off. The result is a tight, punchy bottom with plenty of warm mids, and a slightly snarly presence with very little sizzle. When combined with nickel strings, it really brings that Jazz bass tone out of these basses when you tap that rear coil. Favoring the front pickup ever so slightly also fattens things up a bit.