TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Perfect, thanks.See below. I've had both.
The Barts freq centers have deeper lows and more boost and cut control on the lows and highs.
The LH3 has more boost/cut on the mids.
To me, you can really hear the difference. Both are different flavors of good. I prefer the mid scoop on the Barts.
Bass Mid Treble
NTMB 15dB @ 30Hz 13dB @ 250, 500, 800Hz 16dB @ 10kHz
LH3 12 dB @ 125Hz 18dB @ 225-1100Hz 12dB @ 1250 Hz
Hey guys, I need a five string and have been looking at the 55-01 or 55-02's. Any good reasons to just get the 55-02 over getting the cheaper 55-01 and upgrading the electronics?
A month ago, I was going through the same decision process - looking at Lakland 55-01 and 55-02 vs Fender Jazz vs Sire, etc. In the end, I settled on a used Lakland 55-02.
I did make a few changes to the controls -- I replaced the Volume pot with a Bourns linear taper (still push/pull to retain the passive/active capability). I just prefer a linear taper for a more even ramp of the volume. I also did part of the LH3 mod you may have seen on the internet - added a 25K ohm resistor to the mid terminal of the Midrange pot, and a 10K ohm resistor to the Bass and Treble mid terminals. The mid frequency DIP switch is set for 600 Hz, and the gain trim pot was adjusted for these changes.
It sounds great and the variety of tones you can get out of that bass is really remarkable -- it's like having 3 or 4 basses in one. On top of that, the 35" scale makes for a very solid low B.
I'd say the only thing that would make it better is if there could be a sweepable mid frequency control (versus setting it with the DIP switch). I have two other basses that have a sweepable mid frequency control and it is a nice feature.
Now that it's been a few months, has anyone had a chance to try out the new J-Sonic basses? I'm looking for a new 5 string, and was interested in seeing how it'd compare to my DJ4. More specifically, how different the Chi-sonics are to standard Jazz pickups (mine are Aeros). I know the sonics are inspired by Bisonics, but I wasn't sure how close they made it.
The chi-sonics have more sizzle to them than the vintage Hanson/Lakland pickups. It's a noticeable difference that many people like, including me.
They are in the same sonic territory of the darkstar/bisonic, but not quite the same. I've never found a pickup that properly emulates the Darkstar, other than Curtis Novak's faithful reproductions.
Hey guys, I need a five string and have been looking at the 55-01 or 55-02's. Any good reasons to just get the 55-02 over getting the cheaper 55-01 and upgrading the electronics?
I just placed my order today for one of these.
Lakland Skyline Darryl Jones 5-String - White Pearl, Maple
Pros for me are string spacing and 35" scale. Pretty easy on the eyes too! Let the waiting games begin.....