• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Lakland Owners Group #69

I'll chime in. I also have a stock 55-14 and a 55-02 with Nordstrand pickups and a Bartolini NTMB preamp. I find the 55-14 to be more 'polite' and neutral and the 55-02 is more 'aggressive' and grindy. I use the 55-02 when I want to use distortion or cut through the mix. I'm not sure if it's more the pickups or the pre and I've never played a Stingray so I can't compare the two. When I sweep the blend knob on the 55-02 I can definitely hear a change in tone whereas on the 55-14 it is very subtle.

Thank you. This is good info. Sounds like those Nordstrands may be helping to add more of that high mid grind and aggressive character that I am looking for. I do find that my 55-14 sounds similar with the pre amp set flat and engaged or turned off in passive mode. I am thinking the neutral character comes from the pickups. Sounds like swapping them may be worth the try. Although you have the Bart pre in that bass, I would definitely not consider the Bart electronics to be aggressive in my fretless. I have no intention of modding that particular bass though, being that it is a vintage Lakland.
 
I finally got my first Lakland, after my good friend @chrisbmets has been telling me about them for a few years. This one's a USA made 44-60 Classic with a few factory upgrades. It has a lighter weight Ash body, has a rear rout in case I ever decide to go with an active preamp (also cut out a few ounces), dual concentric pots like the Vintage model, a great tortoise guard and dark rosewood board. The finish is their Tobacco Burst. It feels and sounds as great as it looks. Very happy to have a passive Jazz with single coils again.
View attachment 3582954 View attachment 3582956 View attachment 3582957 View attachment 3582958
IMO the best passive J style bass money can guy. My main player in an olympic whit/rosewood 4460 with the stock Lakland pickups and conentric pots. I play hundreds of gigs a year on that thing and it has never let me down. Great in the studio too. I've used on everything from singer/songwriter records to metal records and it always sounds perfect.
 
Hey Lakland Lovers,
Just my 2 Cents of these wonderful instruments.
I made a P bass shootout with mainly Fender Models from Squire to MIM and MIA and the Lakland Skyline 44-64.
All Fender models had certain issues towards playability, handling and sound.
Only Lakland could offer an ideal price/product mix, which satisfied my needs.
In conclusion, I have chosen Lakland also because of the Pickups.
I like them because they are very hot and vintage voiced at the same time.
A lot of people in this room tend to swap the Lakland pickups for several reasons.
Basically that’s fine and I can understand the will to optimize your sound.
Speaking about me, I would never change the PuP´s in favor for EMG´s, Bartolini´s or whatsoever.
The stock PUP´s are good enough and fit into the overall high quality appearance (even the Skyline Series).
A low budget Squire for example would become immediately a new Pick Up installed to improve the sound.
But honestly, why changing the Pickups in a Lakland bass? Is there really something to improve?
I think we all bought these instruments for the same reason:
They are one of the finest instruments around.
 
Hey Lakland Lovers,
Just my 2 Cents of these wonderful instruments.
I made a P bass shootout with mainly Fender Models from Squire to MIM and MIA and the Lakland Skyline 44-64.
All Fender models had certain issues towards playability, handling and sound.
Only Lakland could offer an ideal price/product mix, which satisfied my needs.
In conclusion, I have chosen Lakland also because of the Pickups.
I like them because they are very hot and vintage voiced at the same time.
A lot of people in this room tend to swap the Lakland pickups for several reasons.
Basically that’s fine and I can understand the will to optimize your sound.
Speaking about me, I would never change the PuP´s in favor for EMG´s, Bartolini´s or whatsoever.
The stock PUP´s are good enough and fit into the overall high quality appearance (even the Skyline Series).
A low budget Squire for example would become immediately a new Pick Up installed to improve the sound.
But honestly, why changing the Pickups in a Lakland bass? Is there really something to improve?
I think we all bought these instruments for the same reason:
They are one of the finest instruments around.
I have both versions of the Lakland P pickup in my Carlo. And, although I favor the Vintage Hot one over the Neopunch, it’s only because of placement. I’ve had a Neopunch in another bass years ago, and I liked it back then too.
 
First foray into Lakland territory - 55-14. I know it lacks the fancy top and fingerboard, but I am blown away by the features, how nice it plays, and I really dig the black and maple combo. I've liked Lakland's aesthetics since they came out in the 90's, but never spent any time playing one. Tried a used 55-02 a few weeks back and was hooked. Got this over the weekend and couldn't be happier.
IMG_20191104_191825.jpg
IMG_20191104_191818.jpg
 
First foray into Lakland territory - 55-14. I know it lacks the fancy top and fingerboard, but I am blown away by the features, how nice it plays, and I really dig the black and maple combo. I've liked Lakland's aesthetics since they came out in the 90's, but never spent any time playing one. Tried a used 55-02 a few weeks back and was hooked. Got this over the weekend and couldn't be happier.
View attachment 3585698 View attachment 3585697
You’d be happier if you put a tort guard on it ;-)
 
Agreed! What's the between the 55-14 and 55-02?
55-14: Quartersawn maple neck with oil finish. Body wood is alder. Plain Maple or rosewood fretboard. Made in Chicago.
55-02: Not quartersawn maple and satin poly finish. Body wood is ash. Import. Laurel fretboard on newer basses, instead of rosewood. Some limited runs have ebony.

So it's a USA model you have? If so the question would shift to the difference between the 55-14 and the 55-94 I guess.
55-14: Alder w/ no fancy top and typically opaque finishes, although I've seen some bursts pop up. No birdseye fretboards.
55-94: In the past- swamp ash w/ fancy maple tops. Now- many wood combinations available upon request. Birdseye, and other fretboard woods available upon request.
 
55-14: Quartersawn maple neck with oil finish. Body wood is alder. Plain Maple or rosewood fretboard. Made in Chicago.
55-02: Not quartersawn maple and satin poly finish. Body wood is ash. Import. Laurel fretboard on newer basses, instead of rosewood. Some limited runs have ebony.

55-14: Alder w/ no fancy top and typically opaque finishes, although I've seen some bursts pop up. No birdseye fretboards.
55-94: In the past- swamp ash w/ fancy maple tops. Now- many wood combinations available upon request. Birdseye, and other fretboard woods available upon request.
The 55-14’s have hipshot licensed tuners and skyline bridges as well, if we’re really getting specific ;)
 
Agreed, but they gotta’ make $$$. I am not disparaging the licensed tuners and skyline bridge, for the record, just pointing it out.
I’ve never really bought into the concept of the 55-14 vs 55-02...they have very minor differences that don’t justify the huge price difference.

Seems to me this is a way to increase profits by making Skylines in the US. Prices are higher to pay for labor...there’s your price difference.