• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Lakland Owners Group #69

Is the Lakland 55-63 a FSO? What say you?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20220607-102257.png
    Screenshot_20220607-102257.png
    2.6 MB · Views: 85
Maybe I should clarify a little bit. Here in Nashville when you go into the studio many old school producers and engineers want to see something that looks like a fender.
Elsewhere on TB those are referred to as FSO or Fender shaped object.
Obvious instruments that qualify as an fso would be a Sadowsky, Mike Lull, Lakland 55-60 & 55-64 etc.
I am sure the 55- dual J sounds like a jazz bass, but I'm wondering if it looks enough like a fender to satisfy the old school producers.
I don't expect that anyone's going to know the answer to this question, just looking for opinions.
 
I’m wondering if it looks enough like a fender to satisfy the old school producers.
From what I’ve read, I would say the 55 dual J would not appease the Nashville producers that expect to see a Fender. The 3+2 headstock and unique body shape make it too un-Fender-ish. But, it’s worth a try I suppose. Someday, they’ll have to get smart and realize that there’s thousands of other fantastic basses in the world that didn’t pop out of Leo’s butt…. right?
 
Headstock would give it away, but here is 55-63 and a 83 Fender Jazz pics for comparison.
 

Attachments

  • 8AEF9F5C-F32A-4D8C-A8C8-B934427CC29F.jpeg
    8AEF9F5C-F32A-4D8C-A8C8-B934427CC29F.jpeg
    429.8 KB · Views: 85
  • 53E327BE-84DA-42E3-BE0D-E509A95C70E8.jpeg
    53E327BE-84DA-42E3-BE0D-E509A95C70E8.jpeg
    429.8 KB · Views: 70
  • C5371F23-5FAB-4F58-8645-F93E6C48C1DA.jpeg
    C5371F23-5FAB-4F58-8645-F93E6C48C1DA.jpeg
    417.3 KB · Views: 71
  • D28F7F7D-FFB4-4803-B15C-F04E6CA52826.jpeg
    D28F7F7D-FFB4-4803-B15C-F04E6CA52826.jpeg
    435.1 KB · Views: 70