• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Lakland Owners Group #69

I just pulled the trigger on [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]. It's swamp ash body with flamed redwood top and maple neck / birdseye board. Only 8.2lb! I'll post in-person photos when it arrives this week. :hyper:

55-94FlameRedwoodCase_1296x.jpg
 
Last edited:
Since it seems like I'm reverb-stalking Dan Lakin, he's got this one marked down pretty well (he seems to price them high initially and then do price drops every couple of weeks). It's purty, with the little Barts too. I just wish it had the maple dots on the fingerboard….

Lakland 55-94 Standard 1996-97 Trans Burgundy | Reverb

6F043EE6-A710-419A-953D-8B459304A70B.jpeg
 
Okay Lakland club. I've been intrigued by Lakland basses for a long time. I'm looking for a bass to be an all-around workhorse bass… something versatile that sounds good in a classic rock, blues, country setting, but can also handle the occasional slap bass or even jazz or orchestra pit setting.

I have my eye on a US 55-94 and I'm just about to pull the trigger. I dig the pickup setup and the variety that comes with the coil tap.

I don't have a dealer nearby to play it, but I've listened to a ton of sound samples and demos. I really like what I hear.

Someone talk me into it. What do you like about Lakland? 55-94 owners, is it as versatile as I'm perceiving?

Thanks!

The XX-94 series is the answer to all of those
 
Is letting a bass, that was shipped in an HSC, adapt/ adjust to the room still a thing??
Gettin' a bit anxious!
View attachment 4724590
I usually open the box to see if the temp inside is the same as the temp in my room. If so, I take the case out. Then I crack open the case and put a couple of fingers in. It there is no noticeable difference, I go for it.

Then again, I am entirely impatient and not a scientific authority on the matter. So, I say go for it.
 
Gig shot? Sure, I can do that! 2005 44-60, formerly called Joe Osborne. Last week at Lake George Tavern, in fabulous downtown Wales MA (blink and you'll miss it).
B4AFA6A3-7E3B-4C56-A7CA-FB30B67B6062.jpeg


I often wondered how big the difference was between the USA and Skyline basses, the latter of which I've owned many. What did I get for my money? It sounds odd even to me, but it is a feeling of solidity — like every part is directly connected to every other part. And for reasons I cannot explain, this is important to me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JEDI BASS
What's the "Small mm pickup?"
I've been told, by Brian at the LowEnd years ago, that they used a 4 string MM pickup on the early 55-94s. He said they have bar magnets, so the B and G are still (but barely) in the magnetic field. He also said they sounded slightly different. If I remember correctly, and others can chime in, they sound a bit more aggressive & less hi-fi…. so more Stingray-ish and less Bartolini-ish.
 
Fresh out of the box from Lakland! :bassist: Skyline 55-60 with a J-retro preamp.

View attachment 4724750

Such a cool bass. I'll have to give the J-retro some time to see if I like it better than passive. If not, I have the stock VVT control plate :)


I am really curious to what your overall thoughts are on the 55-60 with the J-retro! I have been contemplating the same and haven't been able to test one yet. Stock PUPS?