You and I will have to agree to disagree.Ugh, no. Most of what I've seen posted on those sites are totally inaccurate. Or I see three-staff piano-vocal charts that are big, unwieldy, and again, inaccurate.
You can either do the work or not.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
You and I will have to agree to disagree.Ugh, no. Most of what I've seen posted on those sites are totally inaccurate. Or I see three-staff piano-vocal charts that are big, unwieldy, and again, inaccurate.
Ugh, no. Most of what I've seen posted on those sites are totally inaccurate. Or I see three-staff piano-vocal charts that are big, unwieldy, and again, inaccurate.
If you have the ears to recognize the errors, you can fix them. But if you have that kind of ear, you don't need these sites. The people I know who mainly rely on this kind of thing always play the errors and will fight tooth and nail for the right to play the wrong chords.In my experience this is true more often than not. Use those websites with caution, you are bound to find mistakes. At the same time, it can be an educational experience finding and fixing them, but at that point you might be better off just transcribing it yourself.
-Cal.
if you learn how to decipher standard notation = instant mega-repertoire.
just knowing how to equate/link a note on the page with a location on your fingerboard is huge. you don't have to sight-read, per se, you just have to know how to link the two locations. and standard notation gives you rhythm info along with the correct notes, of course.
)In my previous bass life before an 8 year hiatus, I learned the instrument purely through songs and TAB. I had a pretty huge repertoire. Of course I didn't understand anything, but I could bust out a lot of songs!
Since my return, I have focused on theory, and its application on the instrument. However, lately I have been feeling like I have no real repertoire, and most of the songs I knew inside out I can barely remember now. I plan on trying to balance the two aspects of playing, so I thought I would start a discussion on what people think about building a repertoire, how much time people spend on it etc...
Any thoughts welcome!
I wouldn't worry about that too much. What I have found is that if you have a solid understanding of the instrument, and generally understand (and can hear) how most chord progressions are headed, I can pick stuff up quickly. Probably 95% of my practice time is spent on technique, intonation, and scale/interval/arpeggio drills, and very little time on learning tunes. I may be in the extreme, but chops and tone (IMO) are more important than learning tunes.oh that's a work in progress. I am currently learning to sight-read and am doing weekly transcription studies, so all good there. I could definitely figure out the song, but I just dont have that many songs under my fingers anymore, and I guess it makes me a bit sadUse it or lose, it, eh?