• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Loosening Strings to Ship YOUR bass....

Carry on :)
nile.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: inanimate_carb
Yes, but the truss rod equalizes the tension. Front impact, the strings protect, rear impact, the truss rod protects. Side impact, matter and anti-matter combine, annihilating reality as we know it.
I agree. And I left out the scenarios of what happens without strings.

But it all depends on how much matter and anti matter. It could annihilate just a small portion of reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sixgunn
Hi all, Just to dispel some stuff I have seen here about commercial aircraft.
I am licensed aircraft mechanic for a major cargo company here in the U.S.
Yes it is true all modern commercial aircraft lower cargo holds are pressurized.
What is not true is that lower cargo heat is always used. If there are no
live animals on the manifest, a pilot will typically not use cargo heat.
So a lot of the time the lower cargos get very cold during the flight. Boxes never complain.
I have seen a few dead dogs get pulled off of aircraft in my career with passenger
airlines that either the pilot forgot to turn on cargo heat or the cargo heat malfunctioned.
Let the debate continue..........
 
  • Like
Reactions: lowsideonacurve
To my knowledge, FedEx has always reserved the right to inspect the contents of packages, but I could be mistaken.

I'm sure that's the case. In my area, a counter person told me that due to a upward trend in damaged claims, FedEx was trying to mitigate things best they could by having their counter people ramp up their inspection efforts. With ebay, Amazon, Etsy, etc., becoming commonplace, there are probably lots more poorly packed items flowing through their hands. I'm not absolving shippers of all damage cases, as we have all seen properly packaged items damaged by shipper mis-treatment.

It seems to only way to totally eliminate the chance that the counter person may open the box (and potentially mess-up your perfect packing job) is to call for a pick-up or drop off the package at the FedEx depot at the airport, if there is one close by.


As far as any items of extraordinary value (not just musical instruments) there has been limits to insurance coverage.

Yup, but the claim limits for musical instruments was lowered in the past year or so. What sucks is that is you can still purchase $2000 of insurance for $20, even though the claim may now be limited to $1200. (dollar values I posted are fictitious) I'm not sure if that has been corrected in their software or not.

Again, not sure about manufacturers shipping high ticket items, as you are right, that is a completely different situation.

High volume shippers negotiate their own rates. Being self-insured means that the shipper does not purchase any FedEx insurance, rater they take their chances, and by using statistics, they have calculated that any goods lost or damaged in transit that the shipper has to replace on their dime still costs less than purchasing insurance for each shipment.

If you are shipping any item that is valuable due to antiquity or collectability I suggest buying a policy from an insurance agent, and pass on the FedEx insurance, as it will probably not cover the value irregardless as to whether you bought insurance or not.

Sounds like that is worth looking into.

But for now, if the bass's value I'm shipping falls within FedExs' coverage limits, and they request de-tuning to be eligible for their insurance, I'll de-tune it regardless of the engineering arguments for or against.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure that's the case. In my area, a counter person told me that due to a upward trend in damaged claims, FedEx was trying to mitigate things best they could by having their counter people ramp up their inspection efforts.
It'd be great if the shipping companies would, also, ramp up their efforts when it comes to handling packages more carefully.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coolhandjjl
While this remains an unsolvable crisis in the TB world, I would sum it up in the following way.

The person proposing a solution bears the burden of proving the problem exists in the first place. Loosening the strings is a solution and therefore that is the camp that bears the burden of proof in this conversation. But as far as I can see there isn't any evidence of even a single bass damaged in shipping where string tension was a significant contributing factor. Also, all evidence points to instrument manufacturers shipping with strings in tune and the world somehow keeps turning.

But let us carry on. I enjoy a hypothetical discussion probably even more than the next guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sixgunn
In reference to damage by airlines: Have you seen the videos of how some baggage handlers handle our luggage and gear? Some appear to cause as much damage as they can, slamming and throwing items as hard as they can. It is a wonder anything survives, and I'm sure not all handlers do this.

When I worked at a music store I saw several Martin and Gibson acoustic guitars brought in with broken headstocks. The owners said the damage happened from the airline where they checked the guitar in luggage, and all had hard shell cases with no apparent damage, but not fight cases. They had insured their guitars for the flight, but the airlines declined to pay blaming the damage on the owners not detuning the strings. This may be a source of the misinformation that you have to detune for a flight.

I am convinced the airlines will destroy what can be destroyed and deny insurance payments any way they can. Gard, thanks for you informed and accurate responses.

Mark
 

Latest posts