TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I am hoping the larger instrument size doesn’t make it overwhelming, but there is only one way to find out!Yes, in all three combinations the white is very white.
Perhaps a soupçon of yellow/amber? But I also think the 50/50 works if you want to punt and move forward.Yeah, the mando color has a brown tone to it I haven’t fully captured yet. I don’t want to go too crazy over it, I think that 50/50 mix is pretty close, and I think it will look really nice on the instrument. That white top is what is really going to pop.
I have plenty of time to experiment more, I decided on a new neck with a truss rod. I am also leaning towards my first binding experience on this instrument. I figure if I am going to screw up, a $60 old Kay is probably the one to learn my lessons on. If it comes out nice that’s a bonus.Perhaps a soupçon of yellow/amber? But I also think the 50/50 works if you want to punt and move forward.
Halloween took over our lives for a bit, but now I can get back to it. I present the body, in the white. There is a little bit of grain on the back, kind of like birch I suppose. Might make the red/brown a bit more interesting.View attachment 4459351View attachment 4459352
It’s a Kay! I even have the kelvinator plate. Have something neat planned for that.It was an old Kay? Harmony? It’s entirely possible the body is thin birch layers laminated over a form to make the arch. I think I remember reading the Chicago manufacturers like that used birch.
When I see things like that, I tend to stop and ask if there might just be an actual design reason they are "never centered" particularly if they are not "randomly one way or the other" but always offset the same side.The tail button isn’t centered, they never seem to be on these.
I agree, I have to take some measuring tape and see if the sides line up with the centerline where they meet, that may be the issue. It also could be that they lined everything up with the string path, and maybe that is where things ended up in a straight line. I can probably get that string path better centered when I fit the neck if that is the case. Since the tail block was split in the middle it might not hurt to plug and redrill regardless for the added strength to the tail block.When I see things like that, I tend to stop and ask if there might just be an actual design reason they are "never centered" particularly if they are not "randomly one way or the other" but always offset the same side.
I don't have a speculation of what that reason might be at present, but I'd ask the question and think about it before knee-jerking to a centered placement, personally.
When I see things like that, I tend to stop and ask if there might just be an actual design reason they are "never centered" particularly if they are not "randomly one way or the other" but always offset the same side.
I don't have a speculation of what that reason might be at present, but I'd ask the question and think about it before knee-jerking to a centered placement, personally.
That’s a good point thereOn a recent conversion, I placed the tail button off center in order to let the instrument hang a certain way.
(There originally was no tail button.)
What’s neat is how many are still out there! I reset a neck on a ‘48 arch top that had a p-90 installed, and it plays like a champ now.The Kay / Harmony (and other...) production "archtops" were produced to rapidly move through the production process. The neck to body joints were cut in a utilitarian manner without any excess time spent on "proper" neck alignment. Close enough was good, and the tailpiece was positioned where ever it needed to be to align strings on the neck.
The production shortcuts like plywood plates, lack of proper neck alignment and painted binding were all designed to market these as cheaply as possible.