Brad,
You've made a lot of comments about marketing, manufacturing, amp design, loss leaders, etc.
Just exactly what training, technical expertise, and background do you have regarding MI design, manufacturing, marketing, or sales?
Interesting question.. shouldn't you be asking the folks who are coming up with actual numbers? Though I guess they already tooted their horns.
I guess you want an abbreviated resume:
Electronics repair/computer tech, USAF 1977-1980. That's where I received my initial electronics training. SAC.
Computer repair tech and network engineer, private sector beginning in 1980. Dealing with wholesale distributors from that time on. Managed a repair shop during that time, trained techs, supervised and performed repairs and ordered parts from manufacturers and distributors including electronic components.
Working closely with musicial instrument builders for around 15 years. Sales and marketing from around 1995 on. Sales Systems engineer dealing with mult-imillion dollar software sales from that same point on. Wholesale mortgages from 2001 on.
I've been a working musician since the late 1970's and have dealt with stores on a wholesale and retail level for the majority of that time. I've been involved in product negotiations from a wholesale POV too.
My point, which has flown over several heads and continues to do so is still not that MB sold the LMII at a
loss, people keep reading that though I didn't write it. My point is that the LMII, >>>
WHEN INTRODUCED<<< (for the time challenged), came in
WAY UNDER THE MARKET (some even agree with that LOL)
when it was introduced and I offerred that ONE REASON might have been in an attempt to draw in customers to the new brand, they sold it WAY UNDER MARKET VALUE.
And IF they sold it WAY UNDER MARKET VALUE, the normal ratios of costs to selling price might not apply.
