• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Mesa Boogie Bass 400+ opinions?

Hi all. A Mesa Boogie Bass 400 + has come up for sale on the local CL. I'm certainly intrigued, but I have a couple of questions that I was hoping the TB community could help me with.

1.What's the difference between a 400 and a 400 +?

2. How do these measure up as compared to an SVT CL or a
Fender Bassman 300 Pro, or basically any of the other high powered all tube heads?

3. How's the reliability on these, retubing costs etc?

I'm currently using a Traynor TC 810 in the rehearsal space and a TC electronics 112 at home, and bringing a shuttle 6.0 back and forth for home practice and rehearsals/gigs. The idea was to get a dedicated head to use with the 810 that would be able to drive a second 810 if needed. Would the 400+ be up to the task? Does anyone think the 400+ would work better on top of an 810 than a genz shuttle 6?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sartori
I have both a mesa 400 and 400+ so I'll try to help you out as best as I can.

1) 400+ has twice the power that the 400 does. 12 6L6's in the 400+, 6 in the 400. Now I know Mesa claims the 400+ gets around 500 watts but I'm sure that's exaggerated. Sound wise, the 400+ has more low end and has a cleaner sound(on channel 1 that is). My 400 has more midrange grit. Mind you, my 400 is 20-something years old while my 400+ is about 5 years old. 400+ has a 7 band eq where the 400 has 6. You can also run the 400+ at 2 ohms which would work for you since you are considering running 2 8X10's. I don't believe you can do the same with the 400 if I remember correctly.

2) I've never owned another high end tube head so I can't compare.

3) I've blown both of these heads. I had the 400 first and bought it used. I don't believe the previous owner(s) took very good care of it which may have lead to the problems. The 400+ blew within 6 months of me buying it new. It was still under warranty. Haven't had any issues with it since (other than tubes). Which leads to retubing costs. As you could imagine, buying 12 6L6's and 4 12AX7's is a major hit to the pocketbook. So this is something you will have to seriously consider, especially if you plan on using it regularly. Mesa told me that the tubes should be changed every 3 years with normal use.

Overall the 400+ is a great sounding amp and very versatile. However it's a loud SOB and sounds best that way. At least for me. Good luck, hope you get it!
 
  • Like
Reactions: LowWatt and oZZma
I've had the 400+ for one week, bought and compared it to my SVT-CL.
While the Mesa was nice, had a good Tube tone , I got much more out of the SVT ,
Tone wise and Power wise , Plus replacing 12 tubes VS 6 in the Peggy was a no brainer ,
I took the Mesa Back ... But to each there own!