TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I always mic the cab if given the option. It's the only way I have of knowing what sort of sound I'm sending to the house - and my only chance of having any control over it.
I'd of thought that using the amp D.I. out, if it's got one, post EQ setting would give more of your sound than a mic.
When I am playing I accept the fact that the house sound is not in my hands and I just concentrate on playing, I try not to even worry about the house sound.
I do both, mic with a shure beta 52a.
See my above quote...if the soundman knows what he's doing, he can make your sound in the PA so much like your mic'ed cab that you won't know where one ends and the other begins. Happens all the time with me.Weather you use a mic, or a DI, or both, your sound and your space within the mix is always in the hands of the sound engineer.
The belief that dropping a mic in front of your cab will suddenly project the same tone as your amp through the FOH is wishful thinking. True you may impart MORE of your tone into the signal being sent to the board, but the soundman will have the final say in EQ, compression, and presence in the mix.
While this is true (my usage of a 210AV bears this out), if I use an 810, it's up there for ME.I also chuckle when I hear these guys that have to mic their 8x10 cabs because nothing sounds like that rig. True, but the soundman is only micing one speaker, you may as well be using a 2x10 or even a 1x10.
That would be fine if I hadn't had so many soundmen try to make me sound like Marcus Miller in the PA despite not having a sound anywhere near that coming out of my amp. Marcus is fantastic...but I don't want his sound. It doesn't work for my bands. If all soundmen were competent, that'd be a different story. But I micromanage soundmen sometimes and insist on a mic because I have to.I'm a bass player of 27 years (today!) and a sound engineer of eleven years. When I am playing I accept the fact that the house sound is not in my hands and I just concentrate on playing, I try not to even worry about the house sound. When I am running the board, rest assured the bass player gets much love!
I'ev used both an M88 and have owned a PR40 for about 3 years, and never used any of them with a suspension mount, and never had a problem.I would be more inclined to use mics like the Beyer M88 or the Heil PR30 or PR40. But in my experience these mics need a suspension mount because they are sensitive to stage vibration and rumble as well as bleed from other instruments on stage.
Bleed and feedback are overrated with micing bass cabs. There are a lot more mics on my stages that are way more worrisome than the bass cab mic. I always find it hilarious when a soundman tells me he doesn't want me to have a mic because he's worried about bleed and feedback...with 6 vocal mics, two or three horn mics, anywahere from 2 to 6 drum mics, and a guitar cab mic.From an engineer's standpoint, the real advantages of a DI are clean, solid low end with increased headroom and freedom from mic influences/limitations like frequency response, feedback, bleed from other instruments, etc.
I disagree with that. Is it faster to set up a DI? Maybe slightly. But it's no harder to get a sound with a mic than a DI.From this perspective a DI is always faster and more predictable (i.e. easier) to mix in a live setting and in the hands of a capable engineer the results can be excellent. But as many threads here have demonstrated, easier is not always better.