• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Modern Wood

I like my spalted maple....
2015-09-04 17.22.15.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: wmmj
Upright basses tend to be plenty expensive as is, throwing in figured woods would seem to be a little too expensive. Plus, the size of an upright would severly restrict lumber choices.

Acoustic instruments in general tend to be restricted to certain tonewoods. Burled and spalted woods generally aren't stable enough for acoustic use. This is not an issue on electric instruments.

You missed my point entirely with your condescending lecture on common knowledge. A re-read with some thoughtful reflection may be in order. :D :D
 
Some of these crazy tops are actually from a


Very nice. Will it have the volume knob on the bridge like a Rob Allen? Love the clean and simple look of that on a bass like that.

Hey Johnson

Yes, there are a number of features that I borrowed from my trusty Rob Allen mouse and that is most certainly one of them! To be truthful, it is more similar to my Mouse (except for the body shape and it's medium instead of short scale) than it is to any existing Fenders, including the ones that came out of Fender Japan at one time.
 
I'm condescending? Seriously?

DB players don't have the options, thus no real details to fuss over. I suggest you report my posts to mods before calling me condescending.

O.K, I'll spell it out.
My point was not about wood or grain or materials. It was about where our focus is. Is it on music, learning music, or aesthetics that are basically meaningless musically.
Just a point for reflection. I have never run to the moderators to tattle on someone because they said something I disagree with, and if there is something worthy of their intervention in this discussion, I am sure they will make us aware of that.

You missed my point, plain and simple,and lectured me on basic facts any experienced bass player would know. I viewed it as condescending, and your further reply hasn't done anything to dispel that belief.
 
O.K, I'll spell it out.
My point was not about wood or grain or materials. It was about where our focus is. Is it on music, learning music, or aesthetics that are basically meaningless musically.
Just a point for reflection. I have never run to the moderators to tattle on someone because they said something I disagree with, and if there is something worthy of their intervention in this discussion, I am sure they will make us aware of that.

You missed my point, plain and simple,and lectured me on basic facts any experienced bass player would know. I viewed it as condescending, and your further reply hasn't done anything to dispel that belief.
"Play what you want how you want & quit arggerin !"
:roflmao:
*very tongue-in-cheek... Not trying to be an ass*
 
"Play what you want how you want & quit arggerin !"
:roflmao:
*very tongue-in-cheek... Not trying to be an ass*

What we play was not my point either, I made no statement about what we play, nor was i arguing about it. Just pointing out that the reply that was given to me missed the point, as does yours. *very tongue-in-cheek... Not trying to be an ass*
 
Ok, this is a really tough one to ask without trolling or breaking the rules, but I'll try anyway.

First, I'm not going to call out a specific bass or even manufacturer. I'm also not going to try and make anyone change their mind about anything. Regarding taste there is no argument.

I've never been a woody bass guy, although I do admit I appreciate some classic looking basses. It seems to me that over the first 50 or so years of bass history that wooden basses that display wood surfaces have all conformed to a general aesthetic that most people would find appealing, be it on an instrument, a piece of furniture, or a piece of art. Walnut? You bet. Quilted, flamed, or spalted maple? Sure.

However, just in the last year or so I've noticed an abundance of basses made with wood grains and colors that I can only classify as hideously ugly. I'm no arborist but when I see them I start thinking about Dutch Elm disease and other such maladies. The grains are pocked with imperfections and warts, and the colors look ashen, moldy, or otherwise flat-out unhealthy.

I don't think there is any debate that there is a new trend in woods. We never saw basses like this before.

My question is this: does anyone also see these new wood offerings as hideous the same way I do, or am I somehow the exception? Is the ugliness part of the appeal? Are these "anti-coffee-table" basses? Or do these new choices have genuine appeal to folks?

Don't get me wrong, there are still plenty of fine, attractive wood basses being made. It's just the new stuff made with woods the likes of which we haven't previously seen that I honestly don't understand. I've never heard anything but nice things said about them, which is good manners that I respect. It's just left me wondering if I have a rare gene or something when it comes to this subject.
Body shape has a lot more to do with whether I find a bass ugly or appealing than the specific kind of wood grain showing.
 
Call me crazy, I am used to it, but I find it hard to believe that anyone would find fault with this flamed and spalted maple. It's a nitro finish on a mahogany body with tort binding. Paul Slagle of EchoPark did this nasty deed on my forthcoming hollow Jazz:

View attachment 813800

View attachment 813802

But I also realize that for whatever reason - there will always be a few that find it offensive, or simply don't like it, or are not attracted to it. You aren't going to hurt my feelings.

That is what makes the world go round here on the TB. One person's jewel is another person's yawn - and that is how it should be. What a boring world if we all loved the same things.


Love the look of this one
 
O.K, I'll spell it out.
My point was not about wood or grain or materials. It was about where our focus is. Is it on music, learning music, or aesthetics that are basically meaningless musically.
Just a point for reflection. I have never run to the moderators to tattle on someone because they said something I disagree with, and if there is something worthy of their intervention in this discussion, I am sure they will make us aware of that.

You missed my point, plain and simple,and lectured me on basic facts any experienced bass player would know. I viewed it as condescending, and your further reply hasn't done anything to dispel that belief.
Why did you view it as condescending?

How do you know that he didn't think you were honestly wondering why you don't see DB players talking about various spalted grain finishes and so on and so forth?

He may have thought you were asking in earnest. Personally I didn't read it at all as condescending, but as informative.
 
I like this one... Fairly understated until you look at it under direct light.
For what I'm looking for, this bass does it for me: sounds incredible, extremely versatile, and if I want to just perv on a beautiful work of craftsmanship while changing strings or before shedding tunes, well it's got that covered too!

image.jpg
image.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gilmourisgod
Beyond looks, one issue I have had in the past with burled wood is the uneven expansion and contraction of the wood cracking the finish. I once owned a very expensive bass (+$8500) from a builder who's name starts with an F and ends with an A. The top of the bass was a crazy piece of burled redwood. The bass had to be refinished because the burl cracked the clear coat on the front of the bass. I was told by the maker this was happening because the different densities of the burl was resulting in different amounts of expansion and contraction with in the wood, which in turn caused the cracking of the clear coat. The clear coat would crack along the borders of different patterns in the burl.

If it was our instrument (I am an owner here at Fodera), I greatly apologize for the issue. That said, since October of 2009 (since I have been involved with the Company) we have had less than five instruments that required repairs due to this kind of uneven shrinkage, so while it does happen it is far from common. To put this in better perspective, we built and delivered over 500 instruments with some kind of burled top wood during the same time period.

The other thing is that once this issue has been fixed once it generally will not recur...

Kindest regards,

Jason
 
Over the past 15 to 20 years since the 'net started connecting players and builders and more boutique stuff became accessible, I think there have been some definite trends. For a while in the late 90s it seemed like zebra wood was the exotic flavor of choice. Then, various burls and buckeye became very desirable, and the look of choice that a lot of high end builders would select for their ads and NAMM builds.

Beauty is all in the eye of the beholder. I believe a well-designed and ergonomic body, paired with an tastefully selected topwood layout, can result in an amazing outcome.

Here's my spalted top five string, probably the busiest spalt I have ever seen - but I'm satisfied with the marble-like end result.
727D0AE6-A6B1-466A-85CF-5682C2F56179_zps01jst858.jpg
 

Latest posts