• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Modulus Mob

So the owner of the bass lent it to me for a few days so I can explore the sounds and get some playing time on it.
I took some pictures of the neck but my eyes aren't experienced enough to tell if it's crooked or warped in any way. I was hoping to get some help from you all.
Sorry for the low quality images, I can take some more if need be.
IMG_20210810_201407~2.jpg
IMG_20210810_201544.jpg
 
I’m wondering if anyone can shed light on the differences between Q6 necks. The bass on the right is a 2000 model, purchased new by me from Mars Music. On the left is my recent acquisition, 1998 model with truss rod. Notice the shape of the headstock, particularly at the base near the nut. It is much more pronounced angle than the 2000 model. Also, if it appears that the ‘98 is ever so slightly more compact overall, that is not an optical illusion. The bass is just slightly smaller including the nut width. I really prefer the feel overall of the ‘98. Was this a custom order perhaps? The two basses sound almost identical and weight isn’t notably different.
4D66DC6D-F4EB-4C2B-9FCA-A30A21DF83F3.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 532EAB7B-0114-41AC-AC2E-278A21540441.jpeg
    532EAB7B-0114-41AC-AC2E-278A21540441.jpeg
    653.3 KB · Views: 96
So, as promised, here's the update. The first body attempted had a natural wood flaw, so we had to make another. There will be two SST's available. One, a Custom, with a gnarly maple top, Hawaiian Saligna underlay, over alder. The saligna is extremely hard, and had a nut brown color, with a hint of red. I've included a closeup of the arm bevel to highlight it. I think it will look real cool with a stark clear coat, but will also look nice in a trans color. The SST-X body is alder, and will be slightly discounted for the wood flaw you might never notice.
Just want to thank everyone for the input on this project! Here's some pix of the first one.
 

Attachments

  • 1 [tight crop].JPG
    1 [tight crop].JPG
    646.3 KB · Views: 115
  • cutawy CU.JPG
    cutawy CU.JPG
    630.6 KB · Views: 105
  • full 1.JPG
    full 1.JPG
    288.7 KB · Views: 108
  • pups.JPG
    pups.JPG
    1.5 MB · Views: 103
I promised an NBD a few weeks ago and it's finally here (for me at least). 2003 Modulus Q5 with EMG pups + EMG pickup and my first bass with gold hardware. I'm absolutely loving it. Super low action and straight as arrow.

VERY nice, cayenne quilt!

Looks like you've got an EMG BQC system in there, bass/sweepable mids/treble. There's a DIP switch on the circuit board that allows you to tweak the treble control response curve; I've found the differences are fairly subtle, but it's worth trying a few different settings. The manual/instructions are Invalid Link Removed
 
That reminds me that I was going to try those out as well. I’ve been seeing what different sounds I can get out of my Q5 with the bqc (I’ve been very happy with everything flat and pan in the middle), and the treble control is very subtle. I wasn’t sure it was working at first. Not that it’s lacking for brightness ;)
 
Also keep in mind that EMG makes a bunch of different coil types/configurations in that shell size (EMG40), so if you want to try a different sound sometime down the road you've got easy options available. You've most likely got DCs in there, which is the brightest sounding EMG40 available. They come stock in Modulus Qs. The type is marked on the bottom of the pickup. The CS and TW style pickups have a fatter/thicker sound, the P style is a very punchy/ballsy/low-mid forward sound. J styles have the tighter note definition/focus that comes from the narrower aperture of a single coil layout, but have a stacked coils so they don't have any of the hum of normal single coils
 
Last edited: