• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

More truth from Dave Grohl

I don't think that he was so much bashing computerized music as he was the entire musical production process these days, which can basically put any number of musical hacks in a studio for several weeks with a good producer and a lot of hard drive space and get something decent to pop out on the other end. Add to the fact that so many artists today don't have instrumentalists in the band at all, but simply assemble a bunch of folks to record an album, and then assemble another slew of folks to go on tour, and it leaves many folks wanting for the old days when there where more bands than there were entertainment acts. In that regard, I think Dave was being positive and not really slamming anyone. If he took a moment of self-pride, then so be it. He has worked hard throughout his career, and has gone through all the real ups and downs that it seems most bands go through. Dave has my complete respect an admiration. Whether or not someone personally likes the Foo Fighters music or not really shouldn't matter with regard to what he said.
 
What's so wrong with using all of the tools available to you to you to create the music/art that you want?

If using digital technology as your medium is what moves you - go for it!

Dogging someone else for not doing it the way you think that it should be done is lame!

It's kind of like saying that you are not really painting a picture unless you are using a dinosaur hair brush'
or you are not a real photographer unless you use film instead of digital.

It's a big world out there people, with enough room in it for everyone.
 
i think u guys got it all wrong, he not bashing electronica or anything, he more refer to those producers or power that be that create albums like a assembling plant of a car factory and wrap it all up in fancy marketing, that the actually artist creating their own music, singing their own songs and writing their own words.

he is appealing to the musician and artist that actually create and pour out our hearts and minds into their music than has it produced in a factory and wrap it in pretty ribbons.
 
I just want hip-hop to die,at this point I liken it to where hair metal was in 1995. Its just making a fool of itself. The rappers aren't putting any effort into it, usually not even rapping or following any rhythmic patterns at all while they talk over sub-sub-par beats with material that consists of talking about their clothes, jewelry, car, punk @$$ bitches, and what girls are doing to his crotch. Just die hip hop, die.

This sentiment drives me crazy. You are generalising a whole genre based on a few isolated snippets off the radio. Those songs are also ridiculed in hip-hop circles, they are not wholly representative of a genre which includes some very talented people. I feel that it's safe to assume that you haven't listened to any hip-hop outside of the 'popular' stuff out there. It would be like me criticising rock music after only hearing Creed and Nickleback.
 
I just want hip-hop to die,at this point I liken it to where hair metal was in 1995. Its just making a fool of itself. The rappers aren't putting any effort into it, usually not even rapping or following any rhythmic patterns at all while they talk over sub-sub-par beats with material that consists of talking about their clothes, jewelry, car, punk @$$ bitches, and what girls are doing to his crotch. Just die hip hop, die.

I once thought like this. But then someone told me to listen to Jurassic 5. That really got me into GOOD hip-hop and rap.

There is a entire indie world of that stuff too, just like we all have our favorite indie bands.
 
This sentiment drives me crazy. You are generalising a whole genre based on a few isolated snippets off the radio. Those songs are also ridiculed in hip-hop circles, they are not wholly representative of a genre which includes some very talented people. I feel that it's safe to assume that you haven't listened to any hip-hop outside of the 'popular' stuff out there. It would be like me criticising rock music after only hearing Creed and Nickleback.

This is all I ever seem to hear people listening to, not based on the radio. I'm not saying its the only hip hop, but its definitly the most prominent, oozing out of every crack and crevice it seems like.
 
ShredderMaximus said:
This is all I ever seem to hear people listening to, not based on the radio. I'm not saying its the only hip hop, but its definitly the most prominent, oozing out of every crack and crevice it seems like.

Just like more people listen to Katy Perry then Sarah mcclaughlin... Popularity doesn't equal all of a genre of music..
 
I don't think Dave's comments had anything to do with digital or analog either. He said exactly what he meant, that it's about what happens in your heart and what happens in your head, that it's about spending time honing your craft by learning to play, sing, and perform, and not about getting every thing perfect. That it's about the human element, which also seems to imply the interaction of the members of a band that have to make things work over time and deal with all the negative things that come along with that. He wasn't bashing hip hop, electronica, or anything else. I don't think you should put words into his mouth and then talk negatively about him over things he didn't say. That's what junior high kids do.
 
I concur.

As far as using computers, if you google "what is music", this is the first definition that comes up:

Music is
The art or science of combining vocal or instrumental sound


It doesn't say anywhere that you cant use technology to do it. Who really cares (beside Dave Grohl) how you get there?

It's entertainment people, as long as people are being entertained, what's the problem?

music snobs - meh!

The thing is: Not very many of us were "Entertained" by that Lipsynced BS......;) as to what Grohl was reffering to, many people didn't and obviously still don't truely get what he was saying at all..... he wasn't knocking any of the "Artist" there!!!!!
 
I don't think that he was so much bashing computerized music as he was the entire musical production process these days, which can basically put any number of musical hacks in a studio for several weeks with a good producer and a lot of hard drive space and get something decent to pop out on the other end. Add to the fact that so many artists today don't have instrumentalists in the band at all, but simply assemble a bunch of folks to record an album, and then assemble another slew of folks to go on tour, and it leaves many folks wanting for the old days when there where more bands than there were entertainment acts. In that regard, I think Dave was being positive and not really slamming anyone. If he took a moment of self-pride, then so be it. He has worked hard throughout his career, and has gone through all the real ups and downs that it seems most bands go through. Dave has my complete respect an admiration. Whether or not someone personally likes the Foo Fighters music or not really shouldn't matter with regard to what he said.

I believe you're right. And for those of you who aren't big Foo Fighter fans, their latest album Wasting Light was recorded to tape. Yes, analog TAPE. (I think it was digitally mastered, though.) Within the CD slim case was included an actual snip of the tape on which the songs were recorded (or so it says -- I have no way of knowing). His point was, I believe, that you must learn an instrument -- guitar, bass, keyboard, drums, voice, whatever -- and create music. Put it down on a 4-track cassette recorder if that's what it takes. Don't throw a bunch of samples down, have someone sing/rap over it, and call it music or art. Some may not agree with that, but that's what he was saying.
 

Latest posts