Smooth_bass88
vaxx!
- Oct 31, 2006
- 12,122
- 16,793
- Disclosures
- have been on nationally released albums, charting on the Billboard 200
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
i'm ready and willing....point me....others just love to hate.
but this is not a hate thread

16+ minutes to "rationalize" your point: valuable vs scam. it helps if you are a 'believer', IMO. while it's easy to hear the difference: you have to prefer the difference. IME: most don't.the explanation in this video tells it better than I ever will
Re: JHS they have had their business ethics called into question. How they clone/take credit/allegedly strongarmed other builders/etc. I don’t know all the details and I don’t have a strong opinion, but that is the source of divisiveness over them.
The whole JHS thing has less to do with quality, and more to do with shady business.
Stealing circuits. Cloning circuits but claiming them to be original. Etc.
Dirt in general will make your articulation mushier, but Muffs also scoop midrange, so they tend to disappear in dense mixes unless they have a mid control. Most good clones add one, which helps significantly.I would say the area I disagree with people more are muffs. Just never found one that didn’t disappear with the band. Maybe if you’re in a one Guitar band with a guitar player that plays lead or uses a clean tone all the time. Or if you have three amps and three big muffs like Chris from Muse. Every version I tried disappeared with the band for me.
I use one of these for tons of stuff(not always, but specifically for the "colour" it imparts, even clean)--bass, guitar, synth, I re-amp stuff out through it, etc. Have run vocals through it for cool sounds. Killer pedal. Does it sound like the Neve it simulates? I guess that's the potentially divisive part? It certainly does something kinda Nevey....
Well, Barbershop is on the list, that's good. But "divisive?" I'll show you "divisive"! I think this thing is a riot. One of the guitarists I work with--and this is a guy with a pedalboard that has its own zipcode--ran screaming into the other room when I showed him this:
Well, Barbershop is on the list, that's good. But "divisive?" I'll show you "divisive"! I think this thing is a riot. One of the guitarists I work with--and this is a guy with a pedalboard that has its own zipcode--ran screaming into the other room when I showed him this:
DG is already on the list hey-oooooooooooo
I've heard it pronounced both ways.
Correct, everyone but you missed the point of this thread!I believe, and I hope I'm not repeating anybody, but by definition, the most divisive pedal would be any octave divider, no?
Or perhaps a multi-band comp or distortion?
Well, Barbershop is on the list, that's good. But "divisive?" I'll show you "divisive"! I think this thing is a riot. One of the guitarists I work with--and this is a guy with a pedalboard that has its own zipcode--ran screaming into the other room when I showed him this:
Although I already voted I’d be remiss if I didn’t throw the BBE Sonic Maximizer/Stomp into the fray. Opinion is usually strongly divided over whether this pedal adds something truly magic to the sound -or- does absolutely nothing and is one of the most successful scams ever foisted on the music market.
View attachment 2858618
Opinions run very high regarding this thing sometimes. I actually have seen a fist fight break out over this pedal.
@line6man - this is one of those confusingly named sonic “enhancer” or “exciter” devices. Rather than try to recap what this thing does and how it does it, the explanation in this video tells it better than I ever will: