DigMe said:Well that's something I guess. See my above comments.
That's really my only beef with the iPod. Every player has it's weak point/s.
brad cook
Yea, just one of those things I guess. Personally, I like the fact that the battery isn't user-replaceable*. It produces a more solid product with less parts to break(battery casing/hinges and such) Additionally, it's things like that that enable the iPod to maintain such a slim form. Apple is always big on style and aesthetic, I'm sure they experimented plenty with and without user-replaceable batteries in R&D, if there was a way they could do it without sacrificing the iPod aesthetic and sturdiness, then I'm sure they would. Because Apple may be keen on aesthetics, but they are even more keen on stuff that looks good AND is functional(though sometimes you can't quite have both).
*for instance, in 2 years or so, maybe my iPod 40 GB won't be holding a good enough charge for my liking, for $65(after shipping) it is highly likely apple will just go ahead and give me a new iPod, and that ain't not bad.

