TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I will second the Lakland but you can save money with a 55-02 or 44-02 if you don't do fivers.
Another vote for the G&L L2000. Loads of useable sounds. Shame they look so very boring.
Used Fender Roscoe Beck Signature. All passive. Two buckers. You can split the coils in series, parallel, or single. I haven't found a tone I can't cop yet. And it will have a familiar Fender feel. It's a J neck but you get what I mean. Seriously, you can't go wrong with one.
Joe Nerve said:When I had one it was only briefly, and I was still kinda new to bass, so I can't and won't argue. If what you say it true, then there may be one of those things in my future. I liked it a lot at the time, but just for old school stuff. Remeber not being able to get a slap tone out of it fer nuthin, and I can get a slap tone out of ubass. Again, that might be attributed to the amount of experience at the time I had the one I did. I'm a peavey fan, and that bass is a tank.
The sound tech in me advises against this. With PA reinforcement the low end changes enough from bass to bass regardless of how even it sounds at the bass amp. I switch between fretted and fretless, but the change is drastic enough that I wouldn't want them balancing the exact same anyway. But if the PA is set up for a Rush Rickenbacker, it'll be night-and-day heavier when you pull the P bass out. Sure you'll make adjustments at the bass rig, but for example if the sound tech insists on pre-EQ DI and is having a smoke when you switch...
Spector anything. If you're at that price range check out the Legends, amazing basses!
I get by just fine with my P-bass. There is so much more to versatility than electronics. Right hand playing position, muting, dynamics, all play a role in tonal variations.