TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Anyone second that motion?
All in favor please say AYE.

I thought it would be fair to let the people who donated
make the decision, so yes as posted above.
If you have another suggestion MJ, let's hear it.
Is it normal to give money to hospitals in the US, or is it just something you guys do to help people / feel better?
while i agree, how can you enforce it on the poll?
i do agree, though, it's only fair.. is there an official list of who donated?
Any thoughts on that?

I have to assume that Healthcare in Norway is nationalized
like it is in Iceland and other Scandinavian countries. Thus
the concept of donating to them for philanthropical or
research purposes doesn't come up as taxpayer funds already
support them. However, it does limit the budgets for pure
research in medicine.
Dana Farber Cancer Institute in Boston is a primary beneficiary
of the Jimmy Fund, which is huge. They are at the cutting
edge of cancer research and treatment development as a
result. Good research costs a lot of money. Every little bit
helps.