• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

MXR M87 v. Aguilar TLC PLEASE HELP!

Also instead of using a pedal, go for a rack mount compressor.
Uad La3a sounds amazing on Bass, it brings your tone right to the front as well.

I wouldn't waste the 200$-$300 on a cheap pedal compressor. It will probably do more harm than good!

Hell for that much you could get a dbx 160xl and have your bass sound HUGE! But I am super picky bought my tone.

I kind of felt the same way until I started testing some of these newer pedals that have come available recently. The Markbass Compressore, Aguilar TLC, and MXR M87 are all fine compressors compared to many of the rack ones I've used. Some of them are even better than the rack units I've used.... ex. Alesis. Just because it's rack doesn't mean it's great. At the same time, just because it's a pedal doesn't mean it's sub standard. ex. FEA Optifet's reviews speak to a high level of craftsmenship and quality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ballin'bass
One thing that isn't that subtle between the two is the difference in attack times.

M87 = 20uS - 800uS
TLC = 10mS - 100mS

The MXR's slowest setting is still approx. 10X faster than the TLC's fastest setting. The MXR is much better suited for limiting if that is what you are looking for.

Edit: Sorry, I missed chessrocks post. But these specs really backup his statement.

-Frank

I'm not sure if this is true or not but even though the attack times are short, if you follow the instructions that come with the MXR you'll find they recommend running a constant gain reduction as many bass players do already. What I mean is during regular play the gain reduction is always going on and only stops when there is a break in the music. How long of a break depends on the release time setting but in general a quarter note pause in playing won't completely dissengage a compressor. So, in reality, many bass players wouldn't hear the attack time take place except for the first note of a song. After that first note, the threshold has been crossed and it's all ratio until the player stops and then it's release time. Is this not the case?

I don't know what kind of release times are set with the TLC as there is only an attack setting. I'm guessing the release times are variable relative to the attack setting?? My guess is if one had the threshold turned down enough on the TLC they wouldn't hear any difference in the attack setting anyway. Without any indication of when the threshold is crossed makes setting the threshold on the TLC tricky. I use my ears but for many who are not familiar with what compression, ratio, attack and release differences sound like it might be hard to decern what a proper setting is for them.

I think the MXR is still great for regular compression. It would make an excellent limiter no doubt but I wanted to convey that most people wouldn't notice the somewhat short attack time range of the M87.
 
I'm not sure if this is true or not but even though the attack times are short, if you follow the instructions that come with the MXR you'll find they recommend running a constant gain reduction as many bass players do already. What I mean is during regular play the gain reduction is always going on and only stops when there is a break in the music. How long of a break depends on the release time setting but in general a quarter note pause in playing won't completely dissengage a compressor. So, in reality, many bass players wouldn't hear the attack time take place except for the first note of a song. After that first note, the threshold has been crossed and it's all ratio until the player stops and then it's release time. Is this not the case?

I don't know what kind of release times are set with the TLC as there is only an attack setting. I'm guessing the release times are variable relative to the attack setting?? My guess is if one had the threshold turned down enough on the TLC they wouldn't hear any difference in the attack setting anyway. Without any indication of when the threshold is crossed makes setting the threshold on the TLC tricky. I use my ears but for many who are not familiar with what compression, ratio, attack and release differences sound like it might be hard to decern what a proper setting is for them.

I think the MXR is still great for regular compression. It would make an excellent limiter no doubt but I wanted to convey that most people wouldn't notice the somewhat short attack time range of the M87.

Attack, release, ratio and threshold all have a large impact on the compression characteristics. Depending on the range of each of these controls, you may be able to set the comp for a lively sound (somewhat transparent), a constant volume (lacking dynamics = high ratio + fast attack) or an effect-y sound (exaggerated dips and swells = low threshold + high ratio + extended release times). So, all of these controls play an important roll and interact with each other to produce the overall response.

In general terms, the attack is the time it takes for the increased signal over the threshold to be fully brought under control. This happens with every increase in signal level (hitting a note) whether or not the compression is currently active. In some scenarios the musician may not hear the “punch” (attack time) of each note played if the attack time is really fast or the release time is long with lower thresholds and higher ratios. This is similar to what you have described with the longer release times, where the successive notes are already compressed enough to the point where the initial note dynamic won’t jump out as much. But that is only one way that the compressor can be used.

It is true that not knowing exactly what release times or method (fixed release time, adaptive release time or variable times associated with the attack setting) that the TLC uses makes it a bit more difficult to call. But, I think it is safe to assume that since I have not seen anyone say that the TLC has an effect-y sound, that the release time(s) are closely following the signal envelope. If this is the case, then the attack times that the TLC has should allow you to set it up to get the “punch” from each note played. The MXR with its fast attack can not be set up in such a manner, although the lower ratios will allow for more signal dynamics.

I am sure the MXR is an excellent compressor and its design allows it to be a fantastic limiter. All we are pointing out is that it’s really fast and people need to understand that significant difference when compared against the TLC. It all boils down to what works best for you… if you like fast compression or a limiter then lean towards the MXR if you like a slower attack then the TLC wins. If you are not sure, as in the case for the OP (with what he stated his goals are), I suggested to audition both to see what works best for him, because either one can work for his gentle compression needs. Sometimes what you “think” you may want may be totally different after actually trying them.

Another thing that has not been mentioned is that a comp or limiter set with a low threshold, short release time, high ratio with a fast attack will sometimes cause unwanted distortions. What is happening here is that the comp or limiter is acting upon the low frequency waves more than the signal envelope (behaving more like a signal clipper). I only mention this because someone in another thread was describing this type of distortion with the MXR. This is usually can be somewhat remedied with a longer release time and/or a slower attack to better follow the envelope.

I agree that without a compression indicator on the TLC it may be harder to adjust until you are familiar with it. But once you have a “feel” for it, the lack of an indicator will only be a minor inconvenience for most people. IMO, I don’t think the lack of an indicator should be a deal breaker when looking for a compressor.

-Frank

BTW, I just read some posts by chessrocks in the Dr. Strangecomp thread where he uses some humorous analogies to explain compression. It’s a good non-technical explanation of compression that anyone new to compression should read.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mhartman29
I kind of felt the same way until I started testing some of these newer pedals that have come available recently. The Markbass Compressore, Aguilar TLC, and MXR M87 are all fine compressors compared to many of the rack ones I've used. Some of them are even better than the rack units I've used.... ex. Alesis. Just because it's rack doesn't mean it's great. At the same time, just because it's a pedal doesn't mean it's sub standard. ex. FEA Optifet's reviews speak to a high level of craftsmenship and quality.

Yeah it's totally true these pedals are getting better, but I just can't see having great sound without spending the money. I've also A/B'd some of them like of course Boss/Aguilar/MXR but im taking these 100$-to $250 stomp compressor's and comparing them to industry standards like the La3a. Just tested a Emperical Lab's distressor on bass for an industruial band...wow. Sweet jesus this thing makes bass sound awesome! Dude was jamming a Hartke rig too....lmao. But I realize some cats don't really dig spending $1000 to $2000 just to get their bass to sit better in the mix. So these stomp boxes(not the Boss one) will do it for smaller venues just fine!

The Aguilar will work great if you already have awesome tone and just need a little something to get it to cut through, or keep some softer notes more prominent in your mix.

The MXR has more shaping qualities, but has more cut tone to me!
Kinda like an API compressor
 
For what it's worth, I just returned my M87 after really wanting to like it. It's just too transparent and not really what I'm looking for. Very well made pedal, my only gripe with the construction would be the location of the power input which was in a really weird and difficult to use spot. One person in this thread said it's almost more of a limiter - I'd agree with that. It didn't really bring out the notes that needed help and the subtle inflections like other compressors I've used. But it did do a great job of keeping things under control without you ever knowing it was even doing it.

I gigged it pretty thoroughly and really tried to like it. I even considered hanging on to it just as a limiter in tandem with another more assertive compressor but given the price tag it's just not really worth keeping for me.
 
I think both are a good pedal compressor, the M87 that I tried recently it sound's a little bit transparent compared to the TLC but not a huge difference. I will add in the list also the Aphex Punch Factory that is also a great pedale, a bit different for use from the other two but easier to use and with good results.
i think the best way for you is just try both with your ears and with an bass/amp that is more similar to your stuff and see what you prefer better.
Rack compressor are great but not always it just depend, if they cost a lot more (i talk about really good ones, no cheep) is because there are big difference on different specs, including a bigger one as the release time, that for the bass is very important especially on low frequencies, there is a reason why a Distressor cost 1400 $. Anyway for bass I think it's important to know your sound and what you need and than think about a compressor.
I just forgot to mention the FMR really nice compressor. A 1/3 rack that cost as the TlC and the M87 and is preatty good too.
Cheers. Enrico
YouTube
WebSite
 
I just picked up an M87. It does a good job, is quiet and transparent. However, I wish I had never sold my FEA dual band pedal-that was the BEST. I also like compression that can be heard at times, and I haven't been able to get a good "squash" out of this pedal.
 
I would like to know which of these two pedal is the most noiseless when the gain/level pot is turned up
(i've sold my EBS Multicomp because of its noise on gain level over "8:00" )
thanks

My noise test I did revealed about the same amount of noise. The MXR hiss that was detectable sounded a little higher in frequency then the TLC but both were very quiet and didn't compromise the tone or sound of the instrument IMO.
 
Well I came across a good deal on the Aguilar TLC so I went ahead and jumped on it. I'm excited to check it out and will reply back with my thoughts. Thanks again for the great input and helpful advice. I've always had great luck getting the info I need on talkbass! Let the compression begin!
 
Just to give some of you a little extra bit to chew on, here ...

Some of you have mentioned using mild overdrive and sometimes some distortion. Just so you know, if you're using even fairly moderate overdrive, your signal is already compressed, and a compressor pedal is probably just redundant.

And if you're using anything like a Big Muff ... forget about it. :D I mean, there's really nothing left there to compress, so let's at least get that straight. There is nothing left to compress, period and end of story.

Sometimes, it almost sounds like some of you guys are looking for a way to just keep your volume at a relative constant level as you switch between your various pedals, or as you change some of the settings on some of you pedals. For that, you might be looking for something more along the lines of a leveling amplifier (Aphex Compellor or similar).

And if it's more a matter of the lower strings being overpowering or just general unevenness in the lows and highs ... then you're probably thinking more along the lines of a multiband compressor, like the ones boomertech makes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Preventer
....
And if it's more a matter of the lower strings being overpowering or just general unevenness in the lows and highs ... then you're probably thinking more along the lines of a multiband compressor, like the ones boomertech makes.

Although I'm sure FEA labs makes fine products that will accomplish this without compromise but I can't see why either the MXR or the TLC wouldn't be aptly suited for combating lower strings being overpowering or general unevenness in the lows and highs...

What do you base that on? I'm not trolling for an argument but just curious.
 
I have both pedals. Right now I'm using the M87. The TLC is the more transparent of the two. It seems to lift frequencies a little up from 2KHz. The M87 is a bit darker and more coloured - kind of fruity, would fill out thin sounding single coils pretty well.

The M87 attack times, listed as crazily fast, in fact work like most attack controls, giving a clear difference between slow and fast. Setting the threshold on the M87 is tricky - there's a wide range of gain available.

The TLC is easier to set up - and it'll make you sound good. THe M87 makes your instrument sound good; you have to work just as hard as before to be a good player.

I like them both. I also use a Rothwell Love Squeeze for more of an FX effect. I'd like to try the FEA stuff. Not so easy to get hold of.
 
The M87 attack times, listed as crazily fast, in fact work like most attack controls, giving a clear difference between slow and fast

You know, that's a funny thing, and I agree with you. I actually suspect whoever wrote the M87's spec sheet mistakenly used the mu character to mean "milli" instead of "micro", because I hear a lot more difference in the attack times than the ridiculously tiny range of microseconds would suggest.

Time to figure out a test methodology.
 
MuthaFunk said:
This comment really surprises me as I found the M87's led display is as easy as it gets in setting up a compressor. The TLC doesn't have any indication for even a threshold being crossed. How do you set yours up?

I got to try them one after another at BPL since they were sharing a room. I went with the TLC eventually... However I thought the M87 was easier to find a setting. Mainly because I would blindly use the indicator light to get a good starting point. The TLC made me use my ears more and that may be why I thought I found a "better" sweet spot on the TLC.
 
I would blindly use the indicator light to get a good starting point.

"Blindly" is exactly how you don't use it. :)

But, hey, to each his own. I'm new to the compression game and I for one really value a visual indicator to help guide me in the use of a sound processor designed to be as inaudible as can be.