Are you billing yourself as an original band? If so, you should probably be gigging at venues that books original acts. If you're gigging at venues that pay you to play covers, you need to play covers. Pretty simple.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I just hope I don’t have to play that funky music ‘til I die...
I'm stuck between pushing for what the audience actually wants and what gets them dancing and the creative awesomeness of the band.
I'm truly in a tough spot. These are a group of really talented musicians but they don't necessarily have a fundamental understanding of entertainment.
A while ago, people were asking what 'typical Talkbass' is.
This. This is typical Talkbass.
People rag on you from all sides because you want to play originals and if you decide not to play that game, you're ignorant and condescending. *slowclap
We need to hear your best original to evaluate if it is appealing to the listener. Originals can be anything from a one chord jam to a composed piece like "Giant Steps". Let's hear what you got!
Here are some examples of our originals. We range in age from 30ish to 60 in age. Young people are not falling over themselves to hear us play. I like my band very much and don't want to swap bands at all. They are all great people and great musicians.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
it's not quite that simple. if you play original metal, don't play at a place where people want to hear original jazz or original shoe gaze; if you play original pop, you might not go over well at a club where most of the bill is always original death metal. and so on... and if you play covers, a 1970s disco songathon that does great in lots of places may not do well in some venues.
to me, a part of it is that i want people to enjoy themselves while i'm playing.
Covering is somewhat cheap... Most of the art that is with music is left out: Songwriting, lyrics, riffs, rhythm... Re-doing someone elses work is very unappealing to me.
Cover bands are a dime a dozen and I have been done with them for decades. There is no satisfaction in playing the same covers over and over and over again for me. And practically anyone can copy other bands music. I would much rather see a good original band any day.
But some folks need/like the coin they make in cover bands and you can't fault them for that. But I don't anymore and I much more prefer to play originals, which tends to allow for much more creativity/fun for all involved.
some audience members like originals and some like covers.
some musicians like playing originals and some like playing covers.
i think what has been said a few times in this thread, and others, is you need to have an honest conversation with yourself and your band.
do you want to be a cover band where you play 4 sets, the audience knows the songs you are playing, and you make some cash? does playing covers scratch your artistic itch?
do you want to be in an originals band where you play one 1 30-45 minute set, the audience is smaller, and you might not lose money? does the creative process make up for the hardships (that might pay off one day)?
do you want to be somewhere in the middle?
there is no wrong answer.
Likely the same people that see no value in reading music, no value in good technique, no value in learning theory; i.e. no value bettering themselves.It's interesting to see people here saying that there's no value to a player in doing covers.
