• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

My band doesn't do covers

I'm stuck between pushing for what the audience actually wants and what gets them dancing and the creative awesomeness of the band.

I think it’s up to the audience to decide for themselves how awesome they think the band is. And FWIW, in most originals bands I’ve been in or known, their approval shows itself early or not at all. If you’re doing originals and you haven’t clicked solidly with the crowd by the second or third of the (3-minute long) first three songs in your very first set, then it ain’t happening for them. And it’s sure not going to happen for your band either.

I'm truly in a tough spot. These are a group of really talented musicians but they don't necessarily have a fundamental understanding of entertainment.

Yep. Been there. “Genius is pain!” Yadda-yadda. And from my experience it’s a sure fire prescription for failure. The problem your bandmates have is that any form of performance art, be it music, dance, theater, or sports is entertainment. So whatever they may think they’rve been hired to do isn’t what the people who paid to get in are hiring them for.

Once you get rich and famous the balance of the equation shifts and it starts getting to be a little bit more about you. But until that happy day it remains all about them as far as your audience is concerned.

Good luck. If your bandmates don’t come around and stop thinking it’s all about “the art” you’re gonna need it.
 
Last edited:
A while ago, people were asking what 'typical Talkbass' is.

This. This is typical Talkbass.

People rag on you from all sides because you want to play originals and if you decide not to play that game, you're ignorant and condescending. *slowclap

It didn't sound to me like the OP wants to play originals, though. It sounds to me like the OP is in an originals band, but the OP wants to play covers. So my suggestion was to join a band that does what the OP wants to do.

Look, I'm in several bands that mostly play originals. If I didn't want to play original music, I wouldn't be in those bands. But it won't be fun for me if people who come to see us don't like the music. Luckily, they do.

I also played in cover bands for many years. It's where I honed my chops. So I appreciate both sides, have been there, done that in both situations, and I don't have a greater respect for one versus the other. Both have upsides, both have downsides.

Internet discussion, though? There's where you tend to see things get polarized in a very black vs. white manner where people don't often look for the middle ground. I don't know why that is, but I try to look for that sort of thinking in my own posts and stop myself short of posting absolutes. We humans, when electronically enhanced, appear to be argumentative, as a general rule.
 
We need to hear your best original to evaluate if it is appealing to the listener. Originals can be anything from a one chord jam to a composed piece like "Giant Steps". Let's hear what you got!
 
We need to hear your best original to evaluate if it is appealing to the listener. Originals can be anything from a one chord jam to a composed piece like "Giant Steps". Let's hear what you got!

Here are some examples of our originals. We range in age from 30ish to 60 in age. Young people are not falling over themselves to hear us play. I like my band very much and don't want to swap bands at all. They are all great people and great musicians.

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
 
Play the first verse to introduce the audience to your original, then segue into a cover with a similar beat. For example, Chainsaw Dreams: play thru to “Hit me in the head with an 8 pound maul” (about 1 minute in), followed by the instrumental break which segues into a cover by Neil Young (chorus: Keep on Rockin’ in the Free World) ... or Dylan, Tom Petty, Hendrix, REM... something familiar.

The Jetzons made a career doing 1 minute originals.

Also, Don’t go to hell in a bucket. Don’t use don’t in your lyrics because people don’t like being told what to do. Don’t give up on your dreams.
 
Last edited:
My experience is that most audiences want to hear cover or tribute bands. It's one thing to throw in a couple catchy originals, but unless you have an established following, I wouldn't recommend a set list of all-originals.
 
Hey look! A covers-vs-originals thread! How unusual!

it's not quite that simple. if you play original metal, don't play at a place where people want to hear original jazz or original shoe gaze; if you play original pop, you might not go over well at a club where most of the bill is always original death metal. and so on... and if you play covers, a 1970s disco songathon that does great in lots of places may not do well in some venues.

to me, a part of it is that i want people to enjoy themselves while i'm playing.

I think this is a really important point - originals only thrive where there is a scene for them, and not just a scene for original music in general, but for THAT band's genre in particular. I listened to a bit of the OP's tracks he shared, and while there's nothing bad about any of it, I can easily imagine that it's not the style of thing that a crowd seeking fresh original music is looking for.

The genre principle can apply to cover bands too, for that matter. Six Cowards plays contemporary alternative stuff. We had a couple early gigs at bars where the locals HATED us. We're playing Arctic Monkeys and a guy at the bar is calling out, "You guys know any Guns N Roses?" Errr.... no. Even if it matched anything else we're going for, sir, can you HEAR my singing voice? Do you imagine I'm going to attempt Axl Rose? EVER?

Covering is somewhat cheap... Most of the art that is with music is left out: Songwriting, lyrics, riffs, rhythm... Re-doing someone elses work is very unappealing to me.

This post makes no sense to me. If you cover a song, the lyrics, riffs, rhythms are all still there... and unless you're having one of those godawful meandering jam-band sessions, the audience at the gig doesn't get to witness your songwriting itself, they only see the end result... and decide if they like it or not. Composition is not "most of the art that is with music," it's ONE of the skills that goes into creating music.

Cover bands are a dime a dozen and I have been done with them for decades. There is no satisfaction in playing the same covers over and over and over again for me. And practically anyone can copy other bands music. I would much rather see a good original band any day.

I have often encountered the polar opposite - guys who only play originals because, although they usually won't admit it, they lack the musical skills to master a cover song. They compose to their own level and don't push beyond it. As some have posted, even with aspirations to write originals, cutting your teeth on covers is a great way to develop your craft. That's what the Beatles and the Stones and many other bands did.

But some folks need/like the coin they make in cover bands and you can't fault them for that. But I don't anymore and I much more prefer to play originals, which tends to allow for much more creativity/fun for all involved.

While people like to joke about it, I don't think most guys here who play in cover bands are actually doing it for the money - there just isn't that much money in it any more. Maybe you get a hundred bucks or a bit more but hardly anyone is paying their bills that way unless they're in a serious wedding/corporate function band, which is a different animal from the average bar band.

I think I can speak for a lot of the cover band guys when we say that 1) we LIKE the music we play, and 2) we LIKE our audiences and enjoy ourselves when they enjoy what we're doing. The audience is not the enemy to be defeated and subjected to our genius or condemned as philistines, they're a kind of community that we belong to and bring joy to and that's a noble pursuit in my book.

Some people on the thread have been very fond of the false dichotomy, that there's EITHER covers or originals and EVERYONE should be doing one or the other. That's silly. Some people have a talent for song writing. Others have a talent for performance. Of course with no originals bands, ever, there would be no songs to cover. But that's no reason why the cover bands shouldn't celebrate great songwriting by covering good tunes. And a lot of people do both.

I went to a friend's cover band gig a couple weeks ago. A couple of times in the set they broke out originals... that I had done the bass lines for originally in another project! There was actually something kind of satisfying in listening to his current bassist interpret the lines I had done (one was very close, the other I thought missed some key bits).
 
Last edited:
You want to make them get up and dance? If they don't get up within the first 10 seconds.......you've already lost them! Like it or not, if the songs don't don't have booty shaking qualities of some sort...they're just going to sit there and watch.....or leave.

For you guys who play heavy music......pretty much folks will either rave or head bang.....or...same as above.....

Ya gotta give them something that peaks their interest. Just my opinion.
 
It's interesting to see people here saying that there's no value to a player in doing covers. I don't know about that. I learned a whole lot of licks by deconstructing lines written by others. I tend to agree with Hrodbert that too often people "create" original music only to their own level and don't challenge themselves. I like challenging myself and that's one reason that, when I sit down for practice, I often pull out things to cover that are a little outside my comfort zone. I don't really do that when I'm writing music with others, though. In that context I'm usually playing it safe. Just some food for thought.
 
I have oodles of cassettes full of songs I wrote and created. I have a couple problems. First, I can't get musicians to play them the way I want. No matter how much I tried. They can't understand MY vision. Secondly, if I were to play and perform them.....I want to be paid. Period. Art is art, I get it but I ain't playing for free even if it's my own original music. If it's not profitable for me, I'm not wasting my time. To those who won't do covers.....I get it. I'm with you in spirit. If it weren't for y'all, there'd be no covers for me to play. So I appreciate y'all. But if your music doesn't move folks...you can't get upset. It's your music and it's for you.
 
some audience members like originals and some like covers.

some musicians like playing originals and some like playing covers.

i think what has been said a few times in this thread, and others, is you need to have an honest conversation with yourself and your band.

do you want to be a cover band where you play 4 sets, the audience knows the songs you are playing, and you make some cash? does playing covers scratch your artistic itch?

do you want to be in an originals band where you play one 1 30-45 minute set, the audience is smaller, and you might not lose money? does the creative process make up for the hardships (that might pay off one day)?

do you want to be somewhere in the middle?

there is no wrong answer.
 
some audience members like originals and some like covers.

some musicians like playing originals and some like playing covers.

i think what has been said a few times in this thread, and others, is you need to have an honest conversation with yourself and your band.

do you want to be a cover band where you play 4 sets, the audience knows the songs you are playing, and you make some cash? does playing covers scratch your artistic itch?

do you want to be in an originals band where you play one 1 30-45 minute set, the audience is smaller, and you might not lose money? does the creative process make up for the hardships (that might pay off one day)?

do you want to be somewhere in the middle?

there is no wrong answer.

This is a fantastic post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cliff Colton
I've never liked cover bands unless it's something unique like Black Sabbitch, the all-female Sabbath tribute. Therefore I can't see myself playing in one. You can't fake it. If it's just to make a buck, people will see right through it. OTOH, if it's fun for you to play other's people's songs and people dig it, then have at it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdier
Intro, verse, chorus to Johnny B Goode. Once everyone is on the dance floor, break into Digging in the Fertile Dirt.

Keep ‘em dancing with Elvis’ Ring Around Your Neck, with a mid song break to Chainsaw Dreams.

All you need now is 28 more covers and a bar room full of misogynists.
 
I don't get this originals vs covers debate.

Yes, it's easier to get paying gigs playing covers.

However, there are thousands of jobs that pay more than being in a cover band. Why are you cover band musicians wasting your time playing covers when you could be programming computers or plumbing for way more money?

Oh? Because you like playing music? You're willing to do something for less money because you get enjoyment out of it?

Well idiot, that's why people are out there playing originals. They enjoy creating their own music, whether or not it's the most profitable option.