They fit on common bass bridge?
I have see DR strings makes also 41" scale strings on their HI BEAMS label
Is there any build thread about this bass?i would like to see the building progress
Winter 2019 Build Off - the EUV
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
They fit on common bass bridge?
I have see DR strings makes also 41" scale strings on their HI BEAMS label
Is there any build thread about this bass?i would like to see the building progress

Sorry, you are right. Thankfully someone else was able to provide a link!I thought this is a build thread about a 34-32 multiscale
Love the fanned with the 4003 body!
I like number 2. Just be sure there is enough space for the slanted bridge.
This is what I’m leaning towards as well. It’s just so danged sexy, and it’s what most people think of when “Rickenbacker” and “bass” are used together.![]()
Awesome! Can't wait to see this come together!
Are you going with the Nordy Big Blades pickups?
Are you going with the Nordy Big Blades pickups?
Oh wow.
I pulled out the mule, and checked out the Big Blade,
![]()
The Q-Tuner,
![]()
And the single-coil ChiSonic.
![]()
Now, the mule is mahogany and basswood, bolt-on, and 32” scale, so it's not quite the same, but wow, the Big Blade is Big! Bold, brash, aggressive, snarly, like a good rock pickup should be. The Q-Tuner, in comparison, sounded flat and polite; a nice pickup, with a famously clear high-end, but obviously suitable for something a bit more refined. The ChiSonic has a lot of the same qualities as the Big Blade, but a bit thicker and woolier. I had planned on using the Chis on v2.0 of this bass, and I think that will work out well.
The terminals in the mule- are those Radio Shack items?
carved like a PRS
Can we get a wider shot of the top as is? Looks pretty dreamy, and you already have a figured maple top Ric.