TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Shorthand for the phonetic pronunciation of the first syllable of "W".![]()
James had pretty much zero help in the 4th, especially on defense. And despite Smith's hot start, he, Shumpert, and Dellavedova went a combined 10-for-33 (slightly better than their 7-for-35 in Game 4, but still crappy). If that trio could shoot 50% for a game, the Cavs would probably win. Small ball did not work for the Cavs, no one replaced Mozgov's scoring.Great game tonight. Lebron was terrific, but didn't have enough help. Curry looked more like the MVP in the 4th with some absolutely ridiculous shots. The Warriors are simply the more balanced team, and a handy 2-0 since Bigfoot was removed from the lineup. Personally, I love watching the small ball play out. No one can stop James, but there's so much more motion and strategy when there are so many options on the floor. Really enjoying this series.
Credit again to GS, though. Curry was nuts in the fourth, Green had a solid game despite his epic whining, and again that team is deep and healthy enough that someone always steps up off the bench--tonight it was Barbosa (!).
Even if the Cavs lose, I would give the series MVP to LeBron. I don't see anybody on GS as valuable to their team as LeBron is to his.
LeBron not playing team ball? Hes averaging the most assists out of any player this series. He's hit past double digits twice. And as has been said his supporting cast is showing hardly any support. Imagine how many assists he'd have if his wings would hit some shots when he gets them wide open looks. I agree he's dominating possessions but what other choice does he have. But even then he's still playing a team game as much as he couldThat almost qualifies as "Damning With Faint Praise"!
I don't disagree that James is certainly deserving of Finals MVP when you look at his stat line, but A) his "value" to the Cavs seems to have a lot more to do with the lack of reliable production from everyone else on the team; and B) if you look past the stats and watch how he's playing ball -- especially in terms of decision-making, and confidence, and shooting percentage versus time remaining -- I think the argument could be made that giving James the Finals MVP sends the wrong message. Shouldn't it go to the guy who was instrumental in helping achieve the team goal, rather than the guy who just kept the team afloat?
Of course, I wanted Popovitch to get Finals MVP last year, so I'm probably way too idealistic for the NBA to take seriously.![]()
I agree he's dominating possessions but what other choice does he have. But even then he's still playing a team game as much as he could
See, and to me it seems like he's not dominating enough. It's like the years of criticism when people said he needed to stop trying to single-handedly score on every possession and share the ball more, that worked...except now he's sharing the ball with guys who can't hit their shots in the clutch. Maybe I'm just projecting, but it looks to me like -- especially in the 4th quarter of these last two games -- there's a hesitancy, and I can just imagine that hesitancy is coming from a little voice in the back of his head telling him "Your teammates are letting you down, you should just do this on your own."
I think it's good for the sport in general (and for Lebron's success over a hopefully lengthy career) that he had that selfish tendency beaten out of him by the years of criticism, and I sincerely doubt the Cavs would have made it this far if he'd been playing selfish ball all season. But I can't help but think he could've dominated more these past two games if he'd decided he was going to go 1-on-5 for the last 12 minutes.
Really wish I'd paid more attention when Irving and Love were healthy.