I threw this together with parts of two different basses with a lot of innocent wood lost in the process. It's more punky than clunky, but is it in the right direction? Or are we talking big, phat, basses?
![]()
Yeah, I followed that thread with boisterous laughter and gusto. How's your hair BTW?
And yeah, no, that's not really what i meant by clunky. It still has the racecar vibe, see. It looks like a bass of someone who has more balls than brains and as eyeballpoppingly manly as that is, it's not really what i'm looking for.
i always considered my '64 St. George to be rather 'clunky' looking:
![]()
That is clunky, but I don't find it particulary attractive. Alas.