• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Name/show me some clunky basses.

I'm looking for some clunky looking basses. My apologies, I have no idea how to describe what I'm talking about any clearer.

I mean clunky as opposed to sleek. A tractor as opposed to a sportscar. A P bass would be more clunky than a sleek J, see what I mean here?

See, I love the looks and attitude of a Rick 4001/4003, (Oh! The shape! Oooh! that binding! Mon Dieu! Those inlays!Aiaiai! All that big chrome, like machinery!). Somehow however, those basses and me never really got along, playabilitywise. So I'm looking for alternatives to a Ricky, but with the same(-ish) attitude. The only things I can come up with are a Les Paul triumph perhaps, and maybe a thunderbird.

It's annoying that most companies I know of just copy a jazz for the millionth time, or come up with some other supahypasleek bass. I feel a bass of that type of design (though not bad at all) misses character somewhat. Perhaps that is simply due to the ubiquity, but I still feel that way.

Seau. Any suggestions? Or better yet: any pics?

...And yes, this is based on looks alone. What can I say. I'm superficial and have the depth of a wet stamp. Sue me.:p
 
Darkstrikes hobo caster is about as unsleek as it gets

HoBocaster1.jpg
 
Immediately thought of this

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Of course! The mighty T-40! Nice suggestion, didn't think of that. Still misses something lookwise IMO, but definitely a step in the right direction.

Darkstrikes hobo caster is about as unsleek as it gets

HoBocaster1.jpg

Ah. Hum... Hmmm... No. There's clunky and then there's Overthetopsteampunkbraah.

Looks like something seasick steve would play :D
 
Dark Horse's ;)

Though you have uncovered my plot to steal that beastly axe.


To the OP: Stingrays! Trabens! :hyper:

Stingrays: Nice, but not what I'm looking for. Trabens: Aw heallz naw, that's to clunky basses what bling is to jewelry; tacky and overdone. IMO. TY for the suggestion, though.

Ovation Magnum?

YES! I saw that once and have been looking for what it was eversince. I was convinced it was a hagstrom somehow, thanks for suggesting this!

<EDIT: Any idea what these go for these days BTW?>

Keep 'em coming though!
 
YES! I saw that once and have been looking for what it was eversince. I was convinced it was a hagstrom somehow, thanks for suggesting this!

<EDIT: Any idea what these go for these days BTW?>

Glad to be of service! :D

The ones I've seen have been in the $600 - $800 USD range, and almost all of them have had (or needed) headstock repair.
 
Guild/Dearmond Jetstar.

Not sure where your line is between clunky and ugly, but I'd suspect that design has caused a riot or two.

That is over the hills and far away in ugly territory, IMO. It's... It's like a smudge or blob.

Invalid Link Removed
The Ibanez ATK, athough, it could be clunkier...

Great idea! I happen to own one, so I guess I agree :D

Well, I'm not "Seasick Steve", but I did build and do play that bass...


AC1-SMALLFREDDIES8-6-2010.jpg

Ah, you built it yourself? My apologies if I caused you undue stress and psychological inconvenience with my remarks then.:hiding:
 
I threw this together with parts of two different basses with a lot of innocent wood lost in the process. It's more punky than clunky, but is it in the right direction? Or are we talking big, phat, basses?

IMG_0212.gif