• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

NBD: I finally got my Nash p-Bass back!!

I got a Nash PB63 in February and I love it so much I offloaded an American Fender P Bass to help fund a Nash JB63 build. Mine ticks every box and I can’t really see anything taking it’s place. The tone, feel, look and weight really cemented it as my number 1. I really like the Sean Hurley Custom Shop Charcoal Frost so I had Nash build their version of it and they absolutely nailed it. I prefer the neck profile on the Nash and it was about 3k less expensive. The JB63 I’m ordering is also going to be a Charcoal Frost with a matching headstock… can’t wait to see how that turns out!
View attachment 4427340 View attachment 4427341 View attachment 4427342 View attachment 4427343
That is sweet. I love charcoal frost and tort. You're a man of fine taste.
 
I get why nickel Gotoh GB528 tuners might drive somebody mad...

BTW, did it drive you mad when MIJ/CIJ Fender reissue basses used period-incorrect, but nonetheless, heavy plated tuners--on numerous reissue years/models/versions, too!! o_O

Again, Nash Guitars states, "Our guitars replicate the look and feel of vintage pieces with updates that appeal to the modern player." Nothing about faithful period correct duplication or orthodoxy.

Sloppy representation, indeed, but by whom?

It's fine that it's not for you but saying it drives you mad or calling sloppy representation is a tad Broadway musical and misses the point.
I get why nickel Gotoh GB528 tuners might drive somebody mad...

BTW, did it drive you mad when MIJ/CIJ Fender reissue basses used period-incorrect, but nonetheless, heavy plated tuners--on numerous reissue years/models/versions, too!! o_O

Again, Nash Guitars states, "Our guitars replicate the look and feel of vintage pieces with updates that appeal to the modern player." Nothing about faithful period correct duplication or orthodoxy.

Sloppy representation, indeed, but by whom?

It's fine that it's not for you but saying it drives you mad or calling sloppy representation is a tad Broadway musical and misses the point.

Have a nice day.
 
Drives me mad that they call something a given year type instrument and can’t get the tuners(just one example) right. The instruments are fine, just sloppy representation.
Then you're missing the point. They're meant to be played, not hung on a wall. Players want a more modern nut and fret radius. They want graphite bars. They want a superior pickup and hardware and they want it to look the part while it plays like a modern instrument. There's not a Fender out there that provides these specs.
 
Last edited:
Then you're missing the point. They're meant to be played, not hung on a wall. Players want a more modern nut and fret radius. They want graphite bars. They want a superior pickup and hardware and they want it to look the part while it plays like a modern instrument. There's not a Fender out there that provides these specs.

I play my vintage Fenders every day. Like them fine. Would do the same with a Nash if I liked ‘em. Guess I don’t. More for you. Enjoy!
 
  • Like
Reactions: andare
This bass is lightweight (8lb 3oz) & tight. The action is ridiculous and it has that nice rasp when I dig in. I couldn’t be happier.

Any Nash fans out there?

Five years ago or so, I tried a Nash P which looked exactly alike, minus the fact that it was metallic red or similar, IIRC. It was in London, Denmark Street. I worry the situation for those shops and status of that iconic street has further worsened during these though years, but I digress...

I recall it being a great bass, as long as you're not seeking for a specs-perfect reissue of a 57: frets were jumbo-ish, I think the neck shape a bit more modern, kinda like a "postmodern" CS.
Lollar too, and compared to my P (which I think had a SPB1 installed at that point) plugged in the same amp, it sounded quite fatter. I suspect it was slightly overwound, woods and else aside.

There was also an olympic white Nash J which didn't impress me as much: it felt/sounded a bit stiffer, and the vintage tint on the neck of the neck was a bit odd, kind of orange. However, that was a quick, superficial assessment.

The P was great and I bet yours is too.
 
Except lighter weight, better pickup, better neck, better fretwork, and a bit more expensive… lol.

Just by browsing for Nash basses casually, I've found ones that weigh well over 9.5 pounds. So that alone shows that they're not carefully chosen to be light weight. So that part seems to be the same as Fender - luck of the draw.

Lollar pickups are cool, but as an aftermarket pickup, they're easy to obtain and to install wherever you want. Great pups, no doubt, but it's not Nash exclusive.

Better neck is subjective, and with Fender having a plethora of options (vintage, modern, 7.25, 9.5, 12 inch, etc), I'd wager to bet there's something for everyone. I guess you could say that Nash have better QC as far as fretwork and final fit and finish go, I won't argue that.

I mean, all that said, I'd love one. I love their nitro finish, love their relic job (if it's not too severe) and I love the hyper-accented yellow vintage tint that they do.
 
I actually specifically asked for the darkest possible Charcoal Frost they could achieve. Your's looks great too and a real unique piece with the LPB undercoat! Is yours light too? Mine is just about at 8 pounds.
I'm not sure on the weight, haven't had the chance to weigh it. But I've been playing it mostly non-stop since I got it, and am loving it. And the color scheme...*chef's kiss*
 
Played a gig last night with my PB55 (with a jazz pickup in the bridge position) and it was awesome. They best way I can think of top describe a Nash bass is… it’s like your favorite T-Shirt that you’ve had for ever. It’s so worn that it’s soft and it’s the first one you wear after you finish the laundry.
 

Attachments

  • 4480F35A-9D92-41FA-B85F-C618FC3EE3CB.jpeg
    4480F35A-9D92-41FA-B85F-C618FC3EE3CB.jpeg
    588.1 KB · Views: 66
Played a gig last night with my PB55 (with a jazz pickup in the bridge position) and it was awesome. They best way I can think of top describe a Nash bass is… it’s like your favorite T-Shirt that you’ve had for ever. It’s so worn that it’s soft and it’s the first one you wear after you finish the laundry.
It’s like your favorite t-shirt that you’ve had forever, even when it’s brand new. It’s my least expensive bass and I can’t put it down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MascisMan
Hey there. Just curious, what exactly are you referring to when you use the term "relic", or "heavily relic'd"?
Nash basses are notorious for "aging" their basses during the finishing process. Typically, "relic" includes making the hardware look old, adding scratches, the appearance of fretboard-wear, buckle-rash and wear marks in the finish. I briefly owned a Nash that had a heavy relic. This one is on the lighter side.
 
I bought a used J-63 several years ago, and I love it. I'm mostly a P-Bass guy, but the Nash quickly alternated with my '79 P-Bass at gigs. I'd love to get a PB-63, but I have so many Fenders it's hard to justify. Maybe someday before I make my exit...
 
Played a gig last night with my PB55 (with a jazz pickup in the bridge position) and it was awesome. They best way I can think of top describe a Nash bass is… it’s like your favorite T-Shirt that you’ve had for ever. It’s so worn that it’s soft and it’s the first one you wear after you finish the laundry.
Great looking bass. I’m thinking of a PB55 build, have sent a few emails to Bill. Do you know the weight on your bass? I’m hoping for one 8 pounds or lighter.
 
Last edited: