Legendary bass. I played one in a hardcore band I was in. It was indestructible and sounding awesome in the mix .
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I can't wait to play it with my band at rehearsal this week.
View attachment 4142882
View attachment 4142883
View attachment 4142885
View attachment 4142886
View attachment 4142887
View attachment 4142890
I had the 300 in natural finish and the 200 in tobacco burst.The 90s pickups I believe are all the same three coil, with the exception of the passive ATK100, which is a dual coil.
The ATK 100, considered a lesser model, is lighter, made from basswood, with a rosewood board.
The ATK100 is actually my favorite, (the 'highest model I've owned or played is the ATK700)
I know less about the later 2000s model pickups or circuit, but I've heard they sound less snarly, more "boutiquey"
I would like to hear an opinion from someone who owns actives from both era.
Was the newer200 and older300 considered comparable by Ibanez?I had the 300 in natural finish and the 200 in tobacco burst.
The 300 is in its own league but the 200 had a nice thick punchy sound as well..
If I remember correctly the body of the 300 felt thinner but larger. The 200s body felt a bit more compact.
Congratulations on your excellent choice.
View attachment 4143048
I can never not add a like to this picture. Stupid cool.Congratulations on your excellent choice.
View attachment 4143048
What do you mean by the substance? Is it maybe the low mids, that I have the problem with in my MII?I would break my no more basses rule for a MIK 300 or preferably 305. I liked the MII ones too but they lacked a little "substance" for me.
I agree. IMO the ATK is great as a special bass with an unique sound for special applications, but I don't see it being the only bass.It has flats on it now and I play it once or twice a month. I do like the tone, but I'm surprised to see so many highly positive comments. I don't really think it's all that versatile (even with the three way switch). I wish it was a little thicker instead of being so middy. Ultimately I think the looks are better than the sound. Some day I will make a new pickup and a new EQ and set the originals aside for safe keeping.
beauty thanks for sharing congratsHey there! Snagged this beauty today, owner bought it new in around 2006 and has barely touched it. It's showroom new all around and sounds fantastic. To get a good idea of the sounds, check out @LowEndLobster YouTube vid on the higher end version of this bass, same pickup. It's heavy but not t40 level, it also balances great with no neck dive. I love how it feels and looks, I can't wait to play it with my band at rehearsal this week. Here are some pics!
View attachment 4142882
View attachment 4142883
View attachment 4142885
View attachment 4142886
View attachment 4142887
View attachment 4142890
This is my favorite post ever.View attachment 4143665 View attachment 4143666 View attachment 4143667 View attachment 4143668 View attachment 4143669 View attachment 4143670 View attachment 4143671 View attachment 4143673 View attachment 4143674 View attachment 4143675 View attachment 4143677 View attachment 4143678 View attachment 4143679 View attachment 4143680 View attachment 4143681 View attachment 4143682 View attachment 4143683 View attachment 4143684 View attachment 4143685 View attachment 4143686 View attachment 4143687 View attachment 4143688 View attachment 4143689 View attachment 4143690 View attachment 4143691 View attachment 4143693 View attachment 4143694
You're welcomeThank you.