• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

NBD: Squier VM Jaguar V

Hurry up & plug it in! lol I want an audio review.

Well, had the chance to play it the whole jam yesterday, so here's my honest review (even though I'm aware that you pulled the trigger anyway lol)

Worth mentionning that I had to change my cab configuration before I could do any test, so that had an influence on the sound.

- First of all, I've checked the bass page on LAmusic.ca and they list the stock strings as Fender® USA NPS, (Gauges: .045 - .130) so they already come with a pretty decent B string. I've used them all jam long yesterday and they were actually pretty good, might keep them for a while.
- I straigthened the neck a bit and lowered the action. This bass plays and feel amazing for the price, no doubt here. The tuners and bridge are fine but I think they're the weakest part of the bass.
- I had to do some EQ tweaking but I had better result when not using the bass boost, my low-end amp has more than enough bass to cover that part so I'll probably get rid of it this weekend.
- The pickups are very responsive, I tried a bit to switch from one pickup to the other and I think, as much as I know, that the pickups could give either the J and the P sound.
- I didn't notice much of neck dive, I'm using a large leather strap so it might have helped. The weight didn't cause any trouble either.

Pretty much it. This weekend, I'll change the electronic to:

Master volume - Blend - Tone

I kept hitting the highest pot while struming so getting rid of it will also help my playing.

Cheers!

Edit: for the sake of it, here's the setup I've used for my rehearsal. Silly looking but give a decent result

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
 
Well, had the chance to play it the whole jam yesterday, so here's my honest review (even though I'm aware that you pulled the trigger anyway lol)

Worth mentionning that I had to change my cab configuration before I could do any test, so that had an influence on the sound.

- First of all, I've checked the bass page on LAmusic.ca and they list the stock strings as Fender® USA NPS, (Gauges: .045 - .130) so they already come with a pretty decent B string. I've used them all jam long yesterday and they were actually pretty good, might keep them for a while.
- I straigthened the neck a bit and lowered the action. This bass plays and feel amazing for the price, no doubt here. The tuners and bridge are fine but I think they're the weakest part of the bass.
- I had to do some EQ tweaking but I had better result when not using the bass boost, my low-end amp has more than enough bass to cover that part so I'll probably get rid of it this weekend.
- The pickups are very responsive, I tried a bit to switch from one pickup to the other and I think, as much as I know, that the pickups could give either the J and the P sound.
- I didn't notice much of neck dive, I'm using a large leather strap so it might have helped. The weight didn't cause any trouble either.

Pretty much it. This weekend, I'll change the electronic to:

Master volume - Blend - Tone

I kept hitting the highest pot while struming so getting rid of it will also help my playing.

Cheers!

You're going to take it back to a passive setup?? Cuz it has a 2-band active EQ, doesn't it? It would still be a 4 knob setup, unless you pulled the EQ. As far as I'm aware, nobody makes a concentric pot with a blend/linear combination.
 
You're going to take it back to a passive setup?? Cuz it has a 2-band active EQ, doesn't it? It would still be a 4 knob setup, unless you pulled the EQ. As far as I'm aware, nobody makes a concentric pot with a blend/linear combination.

From what I understand it, those are passive pickups with an active EQ that boost the bass, therefore I took for granted that all the bass boost knob was doing was a clean boost for the low frequencies, so as I used it at 0, I just used the pickups by themself (with the tone knob). If that happens to be the truth, I'll remove both the knob and the active EQ. I'll have to order a blend pot though, I wasn't planning to use one of the existing pot as a blend.

Dunno if I got your point right, my in-mind french/english translator is not perfect when talking technical stuff lol
 
From what I understand it, those are passive pickups with an active EQ that boost the bass, therefore I took for granted that all the bass boost knob was doing was a clean boost for the low frequencies, so as I used it at 0, I just used the pickups by themself (with the tone knob). If that happens to be the truth, I'll remove both the knob and the active EQ. I'll have to order a blend pot though, I wasn't planning to use one of the existing pot as a blend.

Dunno if I got your point right, my in-mind french/english translator is not perfect when talking technical stuff lol

Yeah, the pickups are passive, the Fender site's description is a little misleading on the specs of the pre. I've never seen a bass boost paired with a passive tone control. I guess that makes your wiring change easier.

My plan is to pull the EQ, anyways, and replace with a spare Spector TonePump I will have kicking around after I upgrade my Spector to an EMG BQC.
 
Yeah, the pickups are passive, the Fender site's description is a little misleading on the specs of the pre. I've never seen a bass boost paired with a passive tone control. I guess that makes your wiring change easier.

My plan is to pull the EQ, anyways, and replace with a spare Spector TonePump I will have kicking around after I upgrade my Spector to an EMG BQC.

Spector TonePump? Never heard of that, but I'm a bass newbie so I'll do some more research on that. Either way, I'll be hunting for your NBD thread sooner or later!