• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Need Parametric EQ Suggestions

R

rasbass

Dec 29, 2002
81
4
Upstate NY
Visit site
#1
Hi All-

Playing in a jazz combo with my Kay Chubby Jackson bass, realist PU into FDeck into Genz-Benz Shuttle 3.0. Quite satisfying sound and playing except at the higher volumes- my D string gets too hot (starting to feedback), from around Eb to G, which seem to be frequencies roughly 75-100 hz as best I can determine.

The shuttle has a "parametric" equalizer that says 150 hz- 2khz range, but does not seems to help much, as I assume it is addressing frequencies about the problem area. As a consequence, I am considering adding a parametric EQ.

I am open to other suggestions (I have read about physical changes to address resonant frequencies on the bass, but all impact tone), but short of that, I'd like input as to which parametric EQ might best address my problem.

The Empress and the LR Baggs both seem capable of addressing my problem and then some (extra features) but both are pricey. Other suggestions for EQ? Other non-EQ suggestions?

Thanks.
 
#6
rasbass said:
I am open to other suggestions (I have read about physical changes to address resonant frequencies on the bass, but all impact tone), but short of that, I'd like input as to which parametric EQ might best address my problem.

The Empress and the LR Baggs both seem capable of addressing my problem and then some (extra features) but both are pricey. Other suggestions for EQ? Other non-EQ suggestions?

Thanks.
Click to expand...

Rasbass,

Unfortunately, you have two things going against you. The Realist dosen't work nearly as well with multi laminate instruments, so using one on that wonderful Kay CJ bass you own, probably won't get you the optimum sound. The other problem you're going to have, is using the Realist at higher volumes, because the more you increase it's volume, the worse it sounds IME, IMHO.
I have had great success using a Headway EDB-1 pre amp in conjunction with a QSC K8 powered speaker, but I think that moving the Full Circle over to the Kay may yield the best overall results, unless you a doing lots of Arco playing.
 
#8
Ric Vice said:
Rasbass,

Unfortunately, you have two things going against you. The Realist dosen't work nearly as well with multi laminate instruments, so using one on that wonderful Kay CJ bass you own, probably won't get you the optimum sound. The other problem you're going to have, is using the Realist at higher volumes, because the more you increase it's volume, the worse it sounds IME, IMHO.
I have had great success using a Headway EDB-1 pre amp in conjunction with a QSC K8 powered speaker, but I think that moving the Full Circle over to the Kay may yield the best overall results, unless you a doing lots of Arco playing.
Click to expand...

The Realist tone on the Kay CJ is very satisfying for me at low and medium volumes (quartet). The problem is only when things get to the louder volumes -full house, noisy jazz lovers (I know- hard to believe).

I will have a chance to swap it out next weekend. Based on the comments I received I am optimistic that I will get the better volume, just hoping not to lose the good sound I am getting from the Realist.
 
#12
rasbass said:
I don't have any experience with a parametric EQ and am wondering if something like the Rocket, with one band of fully parametric (and two with fixed EQ) will suffice for my Kay CJ UB (with a myriad of acoustic quirks) or if I would be better off with a pedal with 3 bands of para EQ, like the WMD or Empress (quasi "full" parametric).
Click to expand...
Good question. I can only comment that often one's sound is defined mainly by mid-range characteristics. Another one-band parametric EQ that seems to be quite popular is the EWS BMC (Bass Mid Control). That would seem to be targeted to those who already have some control over lows and highs. I haven't tried it, though.
 
#13
rasbass said:
The Realist tone on the Kay CJ is very satisfying for me at low and medium volumes (quartet). The problem is only when things get to the louder volumes -full house, noisy jazz lovers (I know- hard to believe).

I will have a chance to swap it out next weekend. Based on the comments I received I am optimistic that I will get the better volume, just hoping not to lose the good sound I am getting from the Realist.
Click to expand...


Rasbass,
Hopefully you'll find an EQ device that will help at with the Realist higher volumes, but from my experience I'm not sure that's even possible. As you turn the Realist's volume higher, it's characteristic warmth starts to disappear, I'm not sure what causes it but that's my experience.

Ric
 
#14
Search for a used Fishman Dual Parametric Direct Box. Fabulous piece of gear. Full parametric 2 channels. Nice thing is both channels are switchable to cover the whole audio range. What I don't like about some parametrics---one band may be 20 to 500hz, the next from 400 to 2k--and whatever. Sometimes I need to do a few things in just one range. Like with my FC for some reason I always have to notch it at about 70hz. With the Fishman I can then also do a smooth boost or cut in an other area below 400 hz.
 
#16
I got into a Soldering Iron Frenzy and bought and built a BYOC 3 band Parametric EQ. The tiny components and dense board required a fine low wattage tip, thin solder, and wearing a magnifying visor, but I'm quite happy with the results... especially designing the fun artwork.

Invalid Link Removed
 
#18
Bob Gollihur said:
I got into a Soldering Iron Frenzy and bought and built a BYOC 3 band Parametric EQ. The tiny components and dense board required a fine low wattage tip, thin solder, and wearing a magnifying visor, but I'm quite happy with the results... especially designing the fun artwork.

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

Very cool. Two questions: how hard was it to put together? How well does it work for you?
 
#19
rasbass said:
Very cool. Two questions: how hard was it to put together? How well does it work for you?
Click to expand...

I would not recommend the assembly as a project for someone new to kit building. It ain't brain surgery, but precision soldering tools and skills are a must. It's a pretty tightly packed board; the construction manual is downloadable from the product page.

It works well for my personal needs; I like clean midrange details along with tight but round lows. Like any parametric eq, it's only as good as the person twisting the knobs.
 
#20
Bob Gollihur said:
I would not recommend the assembly as a project for someone new to kit building. It ain't brain surgery, but precision soldering tools and skills are a must. It's a pretty tightly packed board; the construction manual is downloadable from the product page.

It works well for my personal needs; I like clean midrange details along with tight but round lows. Like any parametric eq, it's only as good as the person twisting the knobs.
Click to expand...

Couldn't find it. :crying:

Got a link? :help:
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back