Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
New Dingwall John Taylor Signature
- Thread starter 6-3-2
- Start date
gravesbass
Supporting Member
- Aug 16, 2006
- 2,427
- 1,871
- Disclosures
- Endorsing Artist: DarkglassElectronics-SpectorBass-Dunlop-EMG Pickups-Hipshot
I just realized the black tape. It’s the same location in my pic as the buyers bass from fretnation. He did use it for the opener of the set. It sounded great. This is a cool back story.
Congrats! But you forgot to report the most important thing... does it have the Neve preamp on it?
I haven't checked yet, but I don't THINK so - when I fumbled with the controls it felt more like the 3 band Darkglass pre than the Passive/T/B controls of the Neve.
Probably not since it’s exclusive to the JT signature bass as of now, but it’s JT so I guess they could have modded it
I'm quite certain @eqvolvorama 's bass doesn't have the Neve. When I spoke to Jason at FretNation this past weekend, he said he was excited to try the new Neve preamp. By then, he had already shipped that "Artist Demo" bass.
Just watched the John Fox video. Being mostly in my home studio these days, I'm excited that he reports the Neve pre as being quiet. Obviously, sounds great too! The passive tone sounds quite useful. Even without it engaged, however, I don't hear that active "clank" I'm not a fan of. Nice! 
Saw a European dealer that had his ETA as March 21 moved out till April 21 for what it’s worth.
I'm kinda curious how the color choices break down. Like, did orders for Primrose shoot up since we've seen a representative model? Are there as many Seafoam fans out there?
Not the most interesting line of questions but... we've got some more time to fill
Not the most interesting line of questions but... we've got some more time to fill
When it was first introduced as "white" or something generic I didn't have any interest in it. I've owned exactly one white bass and it just didn't work for me. But seeing the actual color as well as the board I think it's great. But I'm sticking with black since it works with everything haha
If I hadn't been amazingly fortunate to be able to put a deposit down on a Rio Dream edition, I would probably have passed on the non-limited variants and gone for a Combustion/NG3, to be honest. The ebony fretboard was a significant part of the attraction for me.
Of the non-limiteds, I think the primrose/maple board is easily the best looking of the three. In my opinion, the brown of the pau ferro doesn't really co-ordinate with any other hue on either the black or seafoam; I suspect that's down to the extra colours introduced by the stripes. An ebony board on either would have been helpful in tying all the colours together and making for a more cohesive unit.
Just my personal opinion, of course. And let's not lose sight of the fact that none of this is considering what they sound like - which some say is more important!
Of the non-limiteds, I think the primrose/maple board is easily the best looking of the three. In my opinion, the brown of the pau ferro doesn't really co-ordinate with any other hue on either the black or seafoam; I suspect that's down to the extra colours introduced by the stripes. An ebony board on either would have been helpful in tying all the colours together and making for a more cohesive unit.
Just my personal opinion, of course. And let's not lose sight of the fact that none of this is considering what they sound like - which some say is more important!
Last edited:
I agree 100% with your take.If I hadn't been amazingly fortunate to be able to put a deposit down on a Rio Dream edition, I would probably have passed on the non-limited variants and gone for a Combustion/NG3, to be honest. The ebony fretboard was a significant part of the attraction for me.
Of the non-limiteds, I think the primrose/maple board is easily the best looking of the three. In my opinion, the brown of the pau ferro doesn't really co-ordinate with any other hue on either the black or seafoam; I suspect that's down to the extra colours introduced by the stripes. An ebony board on either would have been helpful in tying all the colours together and making for a more cohesive unit.
Just my personal opinion, of course. And let's not lose sight of the fact that none of this is considering what they sound like - which some say is more important!
Do you own a SB 1000? That’s what I base my personal playability on … if so how if at all does it compare to the Dingwall?
For sure, the ebony board is fantastic. I was bummed that wasn't part of the production run.
I'll give a quick review on my Dream bass. First off I'm terrible at reviews and do not comment on arbitrary stuff like maple vs. ebony and so on. I don't pick apart many specifics because all that matters to me is the end result, not the pieces. I'm 60 now and have been playing shows literally since I was 15. Very active today in a high profile cover band in my area. I've owned hundreds of basses. I like it! As far as playability I can't add anything thousands of other Dingwall players haven't already said. I mean it's a Combustion with fanned frets, more or less. Two band active preamp. Alot of people are making a big deal about the Neve pre. Hey, it's bass and treble and gives a wide spectrum on each knob. Nothing that different from all the other nice basses that I have owned with two or three band active EQs. I'd compare the top end to the German Warwicks that I used to own. Real crisp and snappy. To me the meat is in the low end. I have a USA Peavey Cirrus 4 (I've also owned over a half a dozen more Cirrus 4s/5s over the years) and I love it. I'd probably compare my Dream bass more closely overall (in tone) to a Cirrus than any other bass I've owned. No doubt why JT made the switch. One thing to note, the Cirrus 4 has the long 35" scale (like the Dingwall, great for long arms). Probably my only gripe about the Dream, which is same with my Cirrus, is that there seems to be a sort of built in compressor. My playing style is already pretty aggressive, and when I dig into the Cirrus or the Dream, I don't get much more out of it in terms of dynamics. For a lighter player I don't think this would be an issue, but for a hard hitter the bass just seems to "top out". On most other basses, even when I'm already playing hard, I can still push the bass even farther for accents and punches and get more out of the bass in terms of volume.
I think this is why JT loves these things (Peavey and Dingwall). I watched one of his interviews where he talked about how he liked getting an even tone across the spectrum (this is when he was talking about his Cirrus). He was comparing it to his Music Man which he considered more of a beast (which I'd also say is much more dynamic). Just for me personally I'd prefer more dynamic pickups. But that is my only gripe and I don't mean to focus on it. I have the unlimited in black on a pre-order and am excited about receiving it. I'll be keeping my Dream pristine and saving it for the bigger shows whereas I'll be taking the black one out on more dates.
