• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

new epifani amps at namm!

Good info on these. Let's hope they are at least somewhat close to being put on the market. It took A LONG time for the other amps to appear after announcement.
agreed, which is why I was glad to see 'spring 2008' there. Although as you say, the 902 was long time between announcement and availability.
he now has a micro head (why in the world would he put those big front handles on there I have no idea!)
I wonder if he has a similar carry bag to the mesa walkabout in mind for this?

Price points will indeed be interesting. I'm not optimistic the piccolo will be LMII price, but hopefully $900 or so.
 
if they even put the ps 400 in the 600 dollar range to compete with gk700rbs and ampeg b2r's and such it will be pretty amazing. i really wish the ps1000 dipped ot 2ohms. anyone know if it does?

none of Epi's digital amps go down below 4ohms(so far).

Anyone have any info on the piccolo?

Piccolo
-Should hit the street at $799.99.
-600 watts at 4 ohms.
-The handles are there to protect the knobs.
-basically the PS600 in a smaller shell.
 
none of Epi's digital amps go down below 4ohms(so far).

Piccolo
-Should hit the street at $799.99.
-600 watts at 4 ohms.
-The handles are there to protect the knobs.
-basically the PS600 in a smaller shell.

nice j!

i remember Tiny mentioning something about the piccolo waaay back in the summer. awesome to see they're finally hitting the light of day.

and yea, love the handles. sorta sick of having random knobs shaved off, and replacing them every 3rd or 4th show...
 
zzounds.com (!) has some of the new models posted...

Cool! That $999 selling price of the 1000 is a nice price-point for that amp.

The PS1000 is quite close to what I've always hoped Nick would do... put out basically a mono amp that is roughly 1/2 of the 902. Given that this amp has an SMPS power supply like the 902, and about the same wattage into 4ohms, and is roughly half the selling price of the 902, this amp might be a winner.

While I would have preferred the bottom channel layout of the 502 as the preamp (i.e., a semi-parametric mid band versus the fixed mid band and 'slap cut'), it is cool that the slap cut has a variable control versus the fixed control on the upper channel of the 502, which is way too extreme IMO.

This looks like a nice unit.... now.. I HOPE it will actually fit in a two space rack, unlike the 502!

Nice!
 
Hey Thanks for subscribing! We are looking at late April. It took longer to construct the speaker cabinet testing hardware at the Bass Gear Lab than we planned - but we've added a lot of capability.

Very cool. I'm picturing you and Bowlus velcro'd to a wall wearing headgear with wires comming out of it hooked to a refragistator!
 
Very cool. I'm picturing you and Bowlus velcro'd to a wall wearing headgear with wires comming out of it hooked to a refragistator!

Well, such might be the case, but the actual speaker test equipment is pretty mack daddy, and our Technical Editor, Shane Radtke from British Audio Service, will be conducting all of the amp/cab/combo testing. I was out at his shop a while back, and while he is sorely lacking in the refragistator department, he does have a test parrot. :D
 
Well, such might be the case, but the actual speaker test equipment is pretty mack daddy, and our Technical Editor, Shane Radtke from British Audio Service, will be conducting all of the amp/cab/combo testing. I was out at his shop a while back, and while he is sorely lacking in the refragistator department, he does have a test parrot. :D

That will be cool. I really like the idea of an independent source for true spec's... i.e., the true power output of an amp, the distortion rate of an amp at 2ohms versus 4ohms, the 'lower end limit' of an amp, the actual - 3db rolloff of a cab and also the 'slope of the roll-off below that, etc., etc., etc., and also the ACTUAL WEIGHT of cabs, which seems to be a spec that should be completely accurate and often is not. I'm really looking forward to this publication.

Quick question... are all of us that have subscribed to the 'paper version' automatically going to receive the on-line version... how will that work?
 
Ken (one of our very first paid subscribers!),
The paper subscribers get their issue a bit before the digital subs - subject to postal delivery times. There was no plan to send the digital issue link to the paper subscribers...but we'd be happy to do it on request or automatically if there's enough interest by the paper subscribers. Thanks!