View attachment 3275391 First gig with the WD800 this past Saturday. It’s sitting on top of a fEarful 15/6/1.
For reference, I currently own several other Mesa amps: a D800+, a Strategy, an mPulse 600 and a 400+. (I also frequently gig with an Alembic
F-1X / Crest ProLite 2.0 and a Reeves 225). I’ve gigged all of those amps with the fEarful 15/6/1 cab in this venue over the past few years, so I am am pretty familiar with both the cab (I love it) and the venue’s acoustics (they are horrible).
Short version: I absolutely love the WD800! It has the tonal versatility of the D800+ coupled with the warmth of the mPulse. I’m amazed at the difference in character that exists between 10 o’clock and 1 o’clock on the gain knob! At 10-11 o’clock the WD800 has a clean tube-like warmth and clarity that I just love. Inherently brighter than the mPulse (but nothing that backing off on the treble control a bit can’t cure) and close to my beloved F-1X in warmth. Push the gain to noon and there is a bit of tube saturation or “fur,” especially when I dig in with the Alembic (a high output bass). The EQ is powerful and musical, and the HPF was crucial to getting a decent tone at this venue, where my cabinet is within a couple of feet of the corner of the room, surrounded by glass

. The acoustics made it hard to hear a big difference with the damping control, but I was able to tighten the bottom end a bit by using it in the middle position. Nice!
This amp won’t be for everybody - the D800+ is fine if your preference is always for a clean and quick tone. I can imagine that many players will like both the D800/800+ and the WD800, but I also suspect that most will prefer one over the other. They are in the same general tone ballpark, but the differences between them are real and usable. The WD800 does the light saturation thing better, and with the 800/800+ it’s easier to get a quick, modern tone. But each can get close to the other.
Andy, you are on a roll! Thanks to you and Mesa Boogie for these amps!