From the little time I've spent:
- all sounds are improved across the board
- more effects slots per patch (7)
- better switching navigation
- front panel programming really easy and intuitive
The following may pop your balloon if you rely on these features:
- tons upon tons upon tons of amps/cabs/fx in the inventory. A good amount are in the B3n, and more are expected on a regular basis via download. You may find initial release slim.
- limited pedal control assignments
- no XLR output
- no USB Audio capabilities; no power via USB
- computer software editor is bare bones, and not yet able to do actual patch creation as you'd expect from an editor.
The "cons" are not deal breakers for me, and IMHO the "pros" make the B3n (and the G3n/G5n) a really good bang-for-buck (in Zoom tradition), and are noticeable improvements over the B3.
YMMV.
Well, to me, that sounds nice. All those other features aren't a big deal to me. The better sound quality is the "winner" for me. I would buy it based on just that. The rest is icing. All the others stuff, no XLR, USB power, not a big deal at all. I may need to invest in one of these used down the road. I mostly use these things at home anyway.
Does this one have a looper and a rhythm machine too?
