TVery cool indeed, for fans of the game.![]()
If you're a fan of QB's(or somersaults

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
TVery cool indeed, for fans of the game.![]()

9ers 20, rams 17..
too bad Lynch broke our streak though... it was a nice one.
The Colts wouldn't have made the playoffs even with PM. No one player makes that big a difference.
The Colts wouldn't have made the playoffs even with PM. No one player makes that big a difference.

The Colts wouldn't have made the playoffs even with PM. No one player makes that big a difference.
I'm inclined to go with this idea as well. Indy has slowly declined each year since they won the SB. The Indy games I saw, they were a very bad team. Put Peyton back in the picture and they would be lucky to grab a Wild Card, they definitely wouldn't be a top team in the league.
People have been saying that for years. Peyton, Mathis, Freeney, Clark, and Wayne are the Colts. They're a team designed to be playing with a lead. Take out the key piece that gets them the lead and the team and its concept crumbles. Indy has based their entire roster behind what Peyton needs to succeed for years and its shown with poor performances the rare times that Manning misses playing time. He is mission critical for the Colts.
Personally, I'm all for the Jaguars beating Indy. I'd love to see Luck end up in Minneapolis/St.L instead of Indy. I'm tired of playing Peyton 2x a year as it is, I can imagine playing Peyton Lite 2x a year for 12 more.
I'm pullin' for Steven Jackson to put about 4-5 of those rushing TDs on your defense....and for the Rams D to look like they did against the Saints earlier this year!
![]()
I'd be happy to play Luck 2x a year. I think we can David Carr or Blaine Gabbert him.
Also, Indy would have to win for St.Louis to get a shot.
The Colts were 10-6 last year, not even good enough to be a Wild Card team last year in the AFC, they won a fairly weak division. Tell me where did the Colts make big improvements to their team compared to last year. They would have been lucky to be in contention for the playoffs this year. The difference without Manning isn't 10 or 12 wins, it's 7-8 at the most.
The Colts were 10-6 last year, not even good enough to be a Wild Card team last year in the AFC, they won a fairly weak division. Tell me where did the Colts make big improvements to their team compared to last year. They would have been lucky to be in contention for the playoffs this year. The difference without Manning isn't 10 or 12 wins, it's 7-8 at the most.
in your humble opinion!
regardless,.. football is all about chances. with the way the Refs control things, i see favor-tisms playing into several out-comes in any game.
Manning gives them the chance to take a 10-6 record and do good in the post-season moreso than 90% of the rest of the QB's. and yes, i believe he could make a total difference.
Colts @ 11-5 with PM this season,... very doable! IMHO

Due to the fact that the Saints still have a steak in winning, albeit a very unlikely one to count on St. Louis beating the 49ers in a game with meaning, the Saints will be playing to win.
This is a BAD THING for the Panthers, despite the OROY performance from Newton, their defense is poop on a cracker against the best offense in the NFL right now.
Panthers 17
Saints 34
I reserve the right to amend this, if the Saints see that the Rams/49er game is out of reach for the Rams and they pull their starters in the 2nd half.
Besides, Brees needs to put up another 250-300 yards to secure his record, and against the passing defense of the Panthers, that is probably about 2 quarters of play...
![]()