If it were young hot chicks, dudes, or couples, we'd be interested, however. Hehe8 unskilled old dudes and you? yeah, I get it.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
If it were young hot chicks, dudes, or couples, we'd be interested, however. Hehe8 unskilled old dudes and you? yeah, I get it.
I'm not sure if I'll be able to watch this week's Bills game, but not 100% sure I want to. Could either be an amazing win over the Pats*, or it could be horrible game where the Pats* come in pissed off, neither FJ or CJ will be in and the Bills offence sucks, and the Pats* just roll over us.
If I can't watch it or watch it somewhere online, its the same as if I boycott right?
Now hockey, there's a sport where the refs basically never have control of the game. Goons rule.

bassman314 said:I shouldn't laugh.... But I did.
Link Removed
for continuity between threads
The Bears offense improved from godawful (vs the Packers) to really bad (vs the Rams). Looks like they may be without Forte again and there are rumblings Bush isn't right at this point either. Bears fans could be in for more humiliation in primetime if it lands on the Bears passing "attack" to carry the team against a Cowboys D with more talent across the board than either the Packers or the Rams.
mrpackerguy said:Have at it guys - I'm going to throw up
WOW, listen to this - makes NO sense whatsoever. The lockout is over this amount?
"As I mentioned Monday, my colleague Peter King reported that the difference between the NFL and the refs' union is $3.3 million a year. Well, there are 256 regular season games. The NFL could have the real refs if it forked over an extra $12,891 per game."
Link Removed