They rescinded the suspension of Walker. I'll admit to be a bit biased so I am interested in what neutral hockey fans think of it. I was hoping for a longer suspension and was thinking that the worst they would do is simply let it stand as called on the ice - my bad for thinking that the NHL can get our of its own way.
What good is it to have rules and referees when you do not enforce the former nor back up the lattter?
What good is it to have rules and referees when you do not enforce the former nor back up the lattter?



