I opted to leave the announcers off and to put on some peter gabriel. looks like I'll be doing that again on Wed.
Whatever it takes, Arb, do it.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I opted to leave the announcers off and to put on some peter gabriel. looks like I'll be doing that again on Wed.
I opted to leave the announcers off and to put on some peter gabriel. looks like I'll be doing that again on Wed.
Jessica Mendoza on the MLB broadcast is a great example. She's actually very knowledgeable about the physical mechanics of the game and actual game strategyNHL on the radio, that's the way to do it. Well, provided your team has a good radio team.
I'm not sure if this will come out right. I think it's cool that the NHL is involving women in broadcasts, but I'd like to see the women they pick to have more actual hockey knowledge. At times it feels more to me like eye candy or just so they can check a box somewhere to say they give women equal chances.
-Mike
Both of the women I've heard doing games are ex-players-but not great talkers.NHL on the radio, that's the way to do it. Well, provided your team has a good radio team.
I'm not sure if this will come out right. I think it's cool that the NHL is involving women in broadcasts, but I'd like to see the women they pick to have more actual hockey knowledge. At times it feels more to me like eye candy or just so they can check a box somewhere to say they give women equal chances.
-Mike
Probably got hit in the head with a puck like the rest of usBoth of the women I've heard doing games are ex-players-but not great talkers.
Multiple media outlets are reporting that the Game 6 ref crew will do Game 7 rather than the Game 5 originally scheduled for Game 7.
Thank you, Commissioner.
hockey is a tough game to officiate). 5.
Hey I'm further west. No calls of embellishment hereEveryone around here agrees, but further west, not so much. Google "Acciari embellishment" for confirmation. Truth be told, I have tried to defend the indefensible, so I understand where the minority of Blues fans are coming from.
The NHL, in effect, admitted that the Game 5 officials were so bad that it was tarnishing their crown jewel. Leagues seldom admit mistakes (especially around officiating and I understand why as hockey is a tough game to officiate). Even less seldom do leagues do something to reduce the risk of the same mistake from happening again. It was actually a smart marketing more than anything else as I'm sure that casual fans and neutral fans prefer a hard, fast, fairly clean game like Game 6 vs the headhunting, slew-footing nonsense of Game 5.
honestly, at the start of the year, I don't think I wouldve believed you if you told me the Bruins would be in the finals. I'm crazy excited and feel good about tonight. I did enjoy the stories yesterday about the blues' owner yelling at the Bruins ice crew. Not sure he realized gryzleck's dad works on that crew.
And tomorrow begins the "Jonesing" 'til mid September pre season.Well, one way or the other, will be over tonight (or maybe early tomorrow morning...). Just hoping for a good game. Been a very even series, back and forth. But if Rask plays like he did in game 6, not sure Blues have much of a chance. Read a good article the other day, basically said that even if Bruins lose, Rask should still win MVP. I would agree.