• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

No, Fender. Stop it.

Not really, it just never went away. CDs were temporary just like cassettes and 8-track, but vinyl persists. I still have vinyl I bought in the 70s and deck and speakers I bought in the 80s. Although the deck isn't sunburst. If Gibson made a vinyl deck would the arm be glued on rather than removable?
Sorry, but having been in record wholesale/retail for almost 30 years(in the US), in the 90’s it was reduced to strictly a novelty item, if carried at all at retail. There were no parallel releases of major titles in all formats, in fact cassettes were being phased out at that time as well. As early as 1990, major label title availability on a variety of desired titles, old and new, started drying up.
As that happened, complaints about the situation were very few and far between. Everybody went out and bought a CD player; it became a premium feature for cars.
I worked a lot in new/used situations during that time period, and we would pay next to nothing when vinyl would come in, it was a low priority/rummage sale item. Certain items, like limited edition or promo only items would fetch good money, but that was for the oddball collector/fanatic market.
The ‘revival’ was another round of record company shenanigans. Having finally realized that the pooch was screwed with Napster and all the other downloading, they seized on an underground trend happening in the early 2000’s where DIY punk bands of the time were releasing singles on vinyl as a big “FU” to the majors(a time honored punk tradition)and also just to be weird. As sales of CDs started to slip due to downloading, they jumped on vinyl again as a way to sell your music collection to you all over again, with the typical knee jerk “let’s make something uncool cool again” trendiness factored in, just like how you couldn’t give away Jazzmasters and Jaguars after 1964 untill Costello and Television made them
inversely hip around 1977.
I find this current obsession over vinyl regressive, just nostalgic fetishism, just like the great vintage/tube amp vs Class D or no amp debate here. Vinyl had so many limitations when it was all there was, and when digital came along, I shed not a tear, as did plenty of other people. With “the kids” so focused on downloads, one song at a time, that in itself has destroyed the concept of the album as a complete work of art, maybe even the capacity to enjoy a lengthy collection of music. Album sales are an exercise in trendiness, like wearing a Tshirt of a band you know nothing about and have never heard, just because somebody else said it was cool.
 
Sorry, but having been in record wholesale/retail for almost 30 years(in the US), in the 90’s it was reduced to strictly a novelty item, if carried at all at retail. There were no parallel releases of major titles in all formats, in fact cassettes were being phased out at that time as well. As early as 1990, major label title availability on a variety of desired titles, old and new, started drying up.

Yup. I'm pretty sure it was drying up already by about 1986. It only took about two years for the vinyl bins to empty out and stay empty. Once Brothers In Arms came out, it was basically game over and the first generation of lousy "AAD" remasters from Capitol and Columbia/CBS started coming out so quickly stores had to set up CD racks real fast.

Fun times. I kinda miss record stores and the surly guys who stood at the register platforms.

I still have an old Dual 1218. Unfortunately it's a friction-wheel model that's developed a flat-spot. So it's heading to the dumpster, but first I'll pull off my old cartridge.
 
Last edited:
I will concede that your statements are legitimate opinion and probably not deserving of being labeled false. At least not all of them. ;)

Apologies.

Also, again, Fender lending MoFi their trademark in return for a licensing fee is really dumb. Fender knows zero about designing a turntable. Lol.

Fender still hasn't designed a turntable, and never will.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alkali Ike
Not really, it just never went away. CDs were temporary just like cassettes and 8-track, but vinyl persists. I still have vinyl I bought in the 70s and deck and speakers I bought in the 80s. Although the deck isn't sunburst. If Gibson made a vinyl deck would the arm be glued on rather than removable?
It would snap off if you ever placed it anything less than delicately onto the vinyl or its holder.
 
Sorry, but having been in record wholesale/retail for almost 30 years(in the US), in the 90’s it was reduced to strictly a novelty item, if carried at all at retail. There were no parallel releases of major titles in all formats, in fact cassettes were being phased out at that time as well. As early as 1990, major label title availability on a variety of desired titles, old and new, started drying up.
As that happened, complaints about the situation were very few and far between. Everybody went out and bought a CD player; it became a premium feature for cars.
I worked a lot in new/used situations during that time period, and we would pay next to nothing when vinyl would come in, it was a low priority/rummage sale item. Certain items, like limited edition or promo only items would fetch good money, but that was for the oddball collector/fanatic market.
The ‘revival’ was another round of record company shenanigans. Having finally realized that the pooch was screwed with Napster and all the other downloading, they seized on an underground trend happening in the early 2000’s where DIY punk bands of the time were releasing singles on vinyl as a big “FU” to the majors(a time honored punk tradition)and also just to be weird. As sales of CDs started to slip due to downloading, they jumped on vinyl again as a way to sell your music collection to you all over again, with the typical knee jerk “let’s make something uncool cool again” trendiness factored in, just like how you couldn’t give away Jazzmasters and Jaguars after 1964 untill Costello and Television made them
inversely hip around 1977.
I find this current obsession over vinyl regressive, just nostalgic fetishism, just like the great vintage/tube amp vs Class D or no amp debate here. Vinyl had so many limitations when it was all there was, and when digital came along, I shed not a tear, as did plenty of other people. With “the kids” so focused on downloads, one song at a time, that in itself has destroyed the concept of the album as a complete work of art, maybe even the capacity to enjoy a lengthy collection of music. Album sales are an exercise in trendiness, like wearing a Tshirt of a band you know nothing about and have never heard, just because somebody else said it was cool.

Hmm, I think this would be the first time in my life I've ever been convinced that something is "cool" against my will. I'm fully capable of making that decision without outside influence. :) And who in their right mind would pay $20-$40 or more for vinyl records at current prices unless they actually like them? I mean they can stream the stuff almost for free. Why pay the $$?

Are you saying vinyl lovers have been brainwashed?
 
i0vr9e2hb9l3cfcf3m3m.jpg
I'm about to show my age. It is probably made by Gerrard. For those of you who are admirably young, Gerrard was one of several really crappy turntable manufacturers.
 
Yup. I'm pretty sure it was drying up already by about 1986. It only took about two years for the vinyl bins to empty out and stay empty. Once Brothers In Arms came out, it was basically game over and the first generation of lousy "AAD" remasters from Capitol and Columbia/CBS started coming out so quickly stores had to set up CD racks real fast.

Fun times. I kinda miss record stores and the surly guys who stood at the register platforms.

We still have record stores here... but then we also all dress like Carnaby Street and drive Minis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tommy V