They were EB series years ago, then Gibson renamed them SG since it has an SG body.Wow! It just seems so wierd looking at an SG that s a bass! I m so used to seeing them in the hands of Angus Young Tony Iommi etc.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
They were EB series years ago, then Gibson renamed them SG since it has an SG body.Wow! It just seems so wierd looking at an SG that s a bass! I m so used to seeing them in the hands of Angus Young Tony Iommi etc.
Oh ok. Thanks.They were EB series years ago, then Gibson renamed them SG since it has an SG body.
+1 to the Thunderbird Club. Great info and discussion about T Birds and other Gibsons. Really nice bunch of people.
There are some really good, interesting Gibson basses. Like TBird1958 said, they are the path less taken, but it is an interesting path. T Birds are well known, as are Rippers, Grabbers etc. Victorys are great basses in the P Bass style. My RDs below never fail to get positive attention for their sound and their looks when they go out.
In answer to the OP's question, I think you don't see a lot of discussion of Gibson basses in the general forum for a couple of reasons. There are less of them around than say, Fenders, and naturally fewer bass players have them- so I guess less overall interest in them. Also some bass players obviously don't like them and make their feelings plain which can make discussion of them in some places unproductive and unpleasant.
![]()
![]()
They were EB series years ago, then Gibson renamed them SG since it has an SG body.
Agreed, I didn't see the need to change from EB series to SG series basses. In their inception, they probably should have been named, SGEB's.That's another thing Gibson has done wrong. They can't call a model the same thing for three years in a row. Many of the model names of their famous basses were given up or changed early.
Fender has a J, a P, and a Mustang, with endless variations. Names haven't changed much in 60 years.
Anybody that "thinks" Gibson basses are muddy might watch the late Andy Fraser, this is live - A brilliant player gone way too soon, love the big, woofy tone of his EB through a mountain of Marshalls.
Yeah, Like I said, my 70's EB 3L was not in the least muddy. It had a good solid sound that just worked.I completely agree! The "Gibsons sound like mud" statement is rooted in complete ignorance of the brand and all of its different models and options which leads me to believe that the myth is continuing to be perpetuated by totally incompetent self proclaimed "bass players" that play with their computer keyboards more than their basses.
Here you goAnd if you're left-handed (as the OP appears to be), you can pretty much forget Gibson.
Active pickups? So they have a preamp and battery in these basses?...The Amp has to match up the power of the pick-ups. The pups are basically active, putting in more power.
Active pickups? So they have a preamp and battery in these basses?