"Tall Lives Matter"?That's how I read it. I'm 6"4' and you nearly triggered me. I was born tall, I didn't choose to be tall.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
"Tall Lives Matter"?That's how I read it. I'm 6"4' and you nearly triggered me. I was born tall, I didn't choose to be tall.
No you don't."Tall Lives Matter"?![]()



I didn't realize I was part of a privileged group.No you don't.
You have all the clothes to choose from, heck, you even have sections and even whole stores dedicated to being big.
Try having a size 7 shoe.
At shops Mens shoes start at 8 or 8 1/2 and kids stop at 6. It is No Mans Land.
And shirts are always out of sizes S and M but have a ton of L, XL, XXL and XXL.
Though I guess I am more comfortable on a plane and can drive any sports car with a top, so.![]()

@slobake and @two fingers , these are good points.
1. Here is what is known, widely and for a long time, about this dude: He invites young women new to AA over to his house after meetings and has sex with them. We know this because he brags a lot. We also know that we never see these women again. Whether his intentions are 'rape' or 'get some' is something that is only in his head. He apparently doesn't say 'Boy did she struggle but I won,' or 'She was easy' when he brags.
Guess what? I don't really care. His behavior is wrong, period. It is predatory. I don't know if you remember your first, second, or third AA meeting, but I remember mine. I was scared, vulnerable, lonely, and desperate for human connection. Although I suppose I could have said words that consented to sex, I know I wouldn't have been in my right mind enough to think through that whole thing. I was incapable of consent. This is why most 12-step groups take a very dim view of '13th stepping.' We're messed up when we get there, and some of us stay that way for a long time.
Yeah I think the guys should have warned her and him (differently), and at the beginning of their conversation they thought so too. Then they talked themselves out of it. Whether or not they would have been successful is another matter, but they are remiss for not making the effort.
I had a sponsor once who attempted to sexually assault me. I won that round, and that was it for our relationship. But it was some time later that I ran into a person my age at a meeting who told me that Roger was such a great guy, they were going to meetings together all over, having such great talks in the car on the way, blah blah blah. I got chills, and said, 'You are being groomed. He is a predator. Get away now.' 'Oh NOOOO he's such a wonderful-' 'No, seriously. It happened to me. It has happened to others. It will happen to you.' I found out later that it had.
Did my strong statements make a difference? Nope. Am I glad I made them? Yup. And if local dude tries this with me around, I will try to at least make sure the woman knows his history, even if it means getting punched. My more immediate plan is to talk to one of the guys who is quite involved in the business side of this meeting, and see if there's anything in the Group Conscience that might be helpful. I mean, this is not a one-time deal.
2. Although I agree to a point and in general, these didn't sound like jokes to me. There was no punchline, just disparaging comments about Women In General. An intentional comedy act or joke is one thing. This was not that context. I come from poor white folk, and I love me a good redneck joke. My Black neighbors told me I can't say that, and I got sad, so I'm still working through that one but am trying to make the changeover to 'cowboy.' The best jokes tell us something true about ourselves, and reveal pieces of our best and worst at once. Jokes aren't funny if there's not something behind them. But again, context and intent.
As for your last sentence, I don't think that's quite right. Change the word 'can' to 'will' and you might be closer.
And once again, here we are having a conversation about sexism etc between guys!
@slobake and @two fingers , these are good points.
1. Here is what is known, widely and for a long time, about this dude: He invites young women new to AA over to his house after meetings and has sex with them. We know this because he brags a lot. We also know that we never see these women again. Whether his intentions are 'rape' or 'get some' is something that is only in his head. He apparently doesn't say 'Boy did she struggle but I won,' or 'She was easy' when he brags.
Guess what? I don't really care. His behavior is wrong, period. It is predatory. I don't know if you remember your first, second, or third AA meeting, but I remember mine. I was scared, vulnerable, lonely, and desperate for human connection. Although I suppose I could have said words that consented to sex, I know I wouldn't have been in my right mind enough to think through that whole thing. I was incapable of consent. This is why most 12-step groups take a very dim view of '13th stepping.' We're messed up when we get there, and some of us stay that way for a long time.
Yeah I think the guys should have warned her and him (differently), and at the beginning of their conversation they thought so too. Then they talked themselves out of it. Whether or not they would have been successful is another matter, but they are remiss for not making the effort.
I had a sponsor once who attempted to sexually assault me. I won that round, and that was it for our relationship. But it was some time later that I ran into a person my age at a meeting who told me that Roger was such a great guy, they were going to meetings together all over, having such great talks in the car on the way, blah blah blah. I got chills, and said, 'You are being groomed. He is a predator. Get away now.' 'Oh NOOOO he's such a wonderful-' 'No, seriously. It happened to me. It has happened to others. It will happen to you.' I found out later that it had.
Did my strong statements make a difference? Nope. Am I glad I made them? Yup. And if local dude tries this with me around, I will try to at least make sure the woman knows his history, even if it means getting punched. My more immediate plan is to talk to one of the guys who is quite involved in the business side of this meeting, and see if there's anything in the Group Conscience that might be helpful. I mean, this is not a one-time deal.
2. Although I agree to a point and in general, these didn't sound like jokes to me. There was no punchline, just disparaging comments about Women In General. An intentional comedy act or joke is one thing. This was not that context. I come from poor white folk, and I love me a good redneck joke. My Black neighbors told me I can't say that, and I got sad, so I'm still working through that one but am trying to make the changeover to 'cowboy.' The best jokes tell us something true about ourselves, and reveal pieces of our best and worst at once. Jokes aren't funny if there's not something behind them. But again, context and intent.
As for your last sentence, I don't think that's quite right. Change the word 'can' to 'will' and you might be closer.
And once again, here we are having a conversation about sexism etc between guys!
I beg to differ. If you are so morally pristine that you're immune from any temptation to do wrong, then you have been gifted far beyond the ordinary run of humanity. If you are oblivious to the good fortune that made you this way, you may be cursed beyond the ordinary run of humanity.
I think we're in a phase where the rules are getting rewritten. Not all in good ways, and not all in bad ways. To some extent, yes, there's going to be overreaction and oversensitivity. I heard a story recently of a (single) young guy who saw a girl in a coffee shop (also single, as far as he could tell at the time), thought she was pretty and walked over to strike up a conversation and ask her on a date. Something I would have considered perfectly ordinary, and not a co-worker or any such situation where there's any kind of power dynamic or anything. She freaked out as though he were Jeffrey Dahmer inviting her to his cave. She was offended and threatened that he dared to approach her in person, rather than on Match dot com or Tinder or something, which is apparently where normal people go to ask each other out. That's a "new normal" that hardly seems sensible to me - and I suspect it will prove unsustainable over the long run and people will settle down.
At the same time, the "old normal," for many since the sexual revolution if not long before, espoused the image of the man as someone who is supposed to be on perpetual sexual "offense" and the woman as on "defense." It was his job to score as much as he could and her responsibility to to decide how much to allow and how much to fend off. It's an inherently predatory framework, yet placed the blame entirely on her if she failed to fend him off. The current furor is attacking that culture, and I say good riddance.
So there are overreactions and extremes, in various directions. My expectation is that with some decency and common sense, and a little moral humility, people will for the most part figure out how to interact without biting each others' heads off.
@slobake and @two fingers , these are good points.
1. Here is what is known, widely and for a long time, about this dude: He invites young women new to AA over to his house after meetings and has sex with them. We know this because he brags a lot. We also know that we never see these women again. Whether his intentions are 'rape' or 'get some' is something that is only in his head. He apparently doesn't say 'Boy did she struggle but I won,' or 'She was easy' when he brags.
Guess what? I don't really care. His behavior is wrong, period. It is predatory. I don't know if you remember your first, second, or third AA meeting, but I remember mine. I was scared, vulnerable, lonely, and desperate for human connection. Although I suppose I could have said words that consented to sex, I know I wouldn't have been in my right mind enough to think through that whole thing. I was incapable of consent. This is why most 12-step groups take a very dim view of '13th stepping.' We're messed up when we get there, and some of us stay that way for a long time.
Yeah I think the guys should have warned her and him (differently), and at the beginning of their conversation they thought so too. Then they talked themselves out of it. Whether or not they would have been successful is another matter, but they are remiss for not making the effort.
I had a sponsor once who attempted to sexually assault me. I won that round, and that was it for our relationship. But it was some time later that I ran into a person my age at a meeting who told me that Roger was such a great guy, they were going to meetings together all over, having such great talks in the car on the way, blah blah blah. I got chills, and said, 'You are being groomed. He is a predator. Get away now.' 'Oh NOOOO he's such a wonderful-' 'No, seriously. It happened to me. It has happened to others. It will happen to you.' I found out later that it had.
Did my strong statements make a difference? Nope. Am I glad I made them? Yup. And if local dude tries this with me around, I will try to at least make sure the woman knows his history, even if it means getting punched. My more immediate plan is to talk to one of the guys who is quite involved in the business side of this meeting, and see if there's anything in the Group Conscience that might be helpful. I mean, this is not a one-time deal.
2. Although I agree to a point and in general, these didn't sound like jokes to me. There was no punchline, just disparaging comments about Women In General. An intentional comedy act or joke is one thing. This was not that context. I come from poor white folk, and I love me a good redneck joke. My Black neighbors told me I can't say that, and I got sad, so I'm still working through that one but am trying to make the changeover to 'cowboy.' The best jokes tell us something true about ourselves, and reveal pieces of our best and worst at once. Jokes aren't funny if there's not something behind them. But again, context and intent.
As for your last sentence, I don't think that's quite right. Change the word 'can' to 'will' and you might be closer.
And once again, here we are having a conversation about sexism etc between guys!
If you think someone at these meetings is a predator and raping women, you best be calling the police to report it.
-Mike
That's good perspective, and I think you're right about the predatory assessment in that case.
Two Fingers didn't say it outright, but I've always known someone asking someone else over for coffee or dessert to usually mean, "do you want to come over and fool around." I kind of assume most people know that. It's possible these young women did too, but, given the environment and the fact they never came back, it seems like whatever they experienced was not positive.
Good discussion. I wish some of our bass playing sisters would give us their perspective.
OK, here goes.
So what you are saying, jmattbassplaya, is that I am unable to invite a guy over for coffee without him thinking I want to fool around? That somehow doesn't seem fair. Why can't it be that I would have to say "Would you like to come over and fool around" to mean "would you like to come over and fool around", and inviting someone over for coffee would mean would you like to come over for some coffee? Who made these ridiculous rules?
I hear what you are saying, it sucks and I don't like it either. Unfortunately that is the way some men think. Maybe discussions like this will help us guys see things in a new and better way.OK, here goes.
So what you are saying, jmattbassplaya, is that I am unable to invite a guy over for coffee without him thinking I want to fool around? That somehow doesn't seem fair. Why can't it be that I would have to say "Would you like to come over and fool around" to mean "would you like to come over and fool around", and inviting someone over for coffee would mean would you like to come over for some coffee? Who made these ridiculous rules?
I hear what you are saying, it sucks and I don't like it either. Unfortunately that is the way some men think. Maybe discussions like this will help us guys see things in a new and better way.
It's unfortunate that this topic can't be discussed without going to extremes. "Not being a creep" and "morally pristine" aren't even on the same plane of discussion. This is why, IMHO, this topic is so difficult to discuss with real-world solutions.
OK, here goes.
So what you are saying, jmattbassplaya, is that I am unable to invite a guy over for coffee without him thinking I want to fool around? That somehow doesn't seem fair. Why can't it be that I would have to say "Would you like to come over and fool around" to mean "would you like to come over and fool around", and inviting someone over for coffee would mean would you like to come over for some coffee? Who made these ridiculous rules?