TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Nope. 100% analog.1) It's a digital effect, yes?
Only tried it briefly without a buffer when I got it just to make sure it worked before I took it to band practice. I use wireless and the All Things Equal on gigs so my line is always buffered. Didn't notice any sort of tone suck happening with it, though. It's a true bypass pedal. I added the buffer just to give a truer representation of the sound by taking the capacitance buildup between the cables and the other pedals out of the equation.2) did you notice any tone suck without the buffer pedal (if you even tried it without it)
Well I guess that's one way to do itI really liked the scrambler in the BA210, I used it subtly for a dub/reggae tone. It honestly killed. I suppose the treble roll off is a nice feature, but it sure would be nice to incorporate the novel feature I've only ever seen on my Route 66- a bass boost! You can get nasty and it still doesn't lose low end! Your samples sound good, there's still just that little bit of missing oomph in the bottom that I've yet to find on any other pedal than the Route 66. The constant complaint of bass players with distortion is they cut apparent low-end… Yet only one company has ever to my knowledge dealt with adding low-end back in, and it's not even a bass pedal![]()
Glad you liked my little demos. IMHO, if you like it in the BA-210, you will love it in the dedicated pedal.Anyway, thanks for the demo, the scrambler seems easily good enough for getting a nice vintage tone.
To my ears, the low end sounds unchanged.
The most important thing to me and most sound techs I work with when using a dirt pedal is maintaining a consistent bottom end. I'm not interested in kicking on a pedal and having the low end change one way or the other because that low end is how people hear the bass in a mix. Sure, the Scrambler got high heavy on the highest settings...that's what happens when you introduce heavy dirt. But that's fine as long as the bottom end maintains its equilibrium with my clean sound in a mix. And that's what happens on its heaviest settings. But honestly, I doubt I'll ever be operating it at its heaviest settings...that's the MXR Bass Distortion's job. The Scrambler is for the milder side of town in my usage of it. But even if I was looking to make it drive that intensely, no doubt in my mind that it would work in a mix.To my ears, the distortion of most pedals tips the balance that many bass amps and FOH systems can handle, and like most pedals, the Scrambler got too high-heavy at the heaviest settings you demonstrated. Essentially it sounds like the bottom drops out when the OD kicks in. It's a perceived difference, but what is sound engineering other than manipulating perception anyway. I agree the bottom didn't really drop out in your recordings, but that's not gonna fly with most sound guys. I'll make a demo to try to illustrate the difference my favorite pedal makes.
It's the same but different. I always have to add low end to use heavier Scrambler settings in my BA amps (I have the BA112 and BA110 v2 myself) and SCR-DI. I don't have to with the dedicated pedal.Assuming the scrambler pedal is the same as on the amps, I'm impressed they made such a wonderful one knob analog OD. It's truly exceptional. All it's missing is a bass boostAnd BTW, it would be no slight in my book if it were digital, I assumed it was on the BA 210. Before I found the Route 66, my only OD effect was on my bass pod pro, not only was the effect good to begin with, but since you changed patches to use it anyway, you could EQ more bass in to make switching as smooth as possible.
They lighter but appear to have the same finish. Velcro is sticking on mine (as well as the SCR-DI) just fine so far, and it's that cheap stuff that comes with Pedaltrains. What can I tell you?Are the Scrambler and Classic cases made the same as the SCR-DI? Whatever the finish is seems to be very resistant to adhesive velcro strips!
Does sound like a nice pedal in that demo, but as you said, it also costs twice as much almost, and it's big. Well, no one pedal is for everyone, but I think it kickshow about if you can get really nasty AND maintain bottom end? I've literally had sound guys applaud when I've kicked this pedal in, you can dial in zero bottom loss... I think I just invented some new marketing mumbo jumbo! I'd like to hear some clean to really dirty switching to see how the Scrambler stacks up. I'll keep in mind the Route 66 does cost almost 2X as much as the scrambler. I've been very impressed with the latest Ampeg gear, the PF 50t is incredible, it's seriously threatening my plan of getting a Neve portico DI, the BA series with scrambler is so good I'm thinking of further cluttering my office with a 10 or 12, they're almost giving them away right now.
They lighter but appear to have the same finish. Velcro is sticking on mine (as well as the SCR-DI) just fine so far, and it's that cheap stuff that comes with Pedaltrains. What can I tell you?
Hi, Jimmy,Bonus points for the FI!
You know, I never owned a V1 and it has been so long since I've played a V1 that I honestly can't remember. Seems to me they sounded pretty much the same as best as I can recall, but with the disclaimer that it's been years. I do like the sound of the BA112 v2 when you crank it, though I never do on a gig, lest I get the look. I know the BA108 and 110 v2 sound basically the same as the V1's, although I think the V2 versions are cleaner. But I'm just not sure enough about the 112's to tell you for sure. Maybe someone else with more recent knowledge can chime in.Hi, Jimmy,
You posted SOMEWHERE in this thread that you have the BA112 v.2. I know in the past you have praised the BA112 v.1 To your ear, which is the better sounding one, specifically when cranked to distortion. While I realize that the v2 should have the edge with the Scrambler, it seems to me the gain on that series was pretty sweet and I was thinking of running my highs and mids into a 50W 112 and the lows into my B100R. For this application the V1 is MUCH more desirable visually, but your tastes seem to be pretty consistent with mine based on what I've read, so I might try a new one if you say they sound better (and the new one's 75W right? No biggy either way, but might make it a good grab and jam amp).
Okay, thanks - I thought I'd seen you praising your 112 before the new ones camp out - guess I was wrong.You know, I never owned a V1 and it has been so long since I've played a V1 that I honestly can't remember. Seems to me they sounded pretty much the same as best as I can recall, but with the disclaimer that it's been years. I do like the sound of the BA112 v2 when you crank it, though I never do on a gig, lest I get the look. I know the BA108 and 110 v2 sound basically the same as the V1's, although I think the V2 versions are cleaner. But I'm just not sure enough about the 112's to tell you for sure. Maybe someone else with more recent knowledge can chime in.
Oh, I praised the BA112 v1 many times in the past. But I never owned one and really only played through one at the store a handful of times years ago. But I did like it, and I like my v2, tooOkay, thanks - I thought I'd seen you praising your 112 before the new ones camp out - guess I was wrong.
Nothing wrong with Digitech stuff! Been using their stuff off and on for decades, too. Not familiar with that pedal much at all, though. And honestly, I'm not as familiar with the Classic as I'd like to be, either. Tried it out on my upright for a gig, but my MXR 6-Band EQ is better at pinpointing the rogue frequency ranges that can mess up the sound of your upright. Have messed with it a little at home, and it sounds a little brighter than I like with the treble knob at noon, but that's easily taken care of. Couldn't tell you if it's flat at noon, but definitely sounds Ampeggy and is very easy to tweak your sound into greatness.I'm waiting for the classic to be in stock at my local music shop. Pretty sure I'm gonna get it especially for the price point. I'm wanting it for a base tone and hoping my b7k and vmt play well through it. Atm I'm using b7k set cleanish and stack the vmt into it and although I really like it this way I feel I'd rather have something else set my base tone and can set b7k for higher gain tool/rage etc. and vmt for...well vintage tones and can still stack b7k/vmt for super high gain type material if needed. From the demos I've heard on the classic (as well as scr di without scrambler engaged ) set flat is almost the bass guitar original tone and can tweak from there is what I like. If it works well it'll be last in my chain so can't use di from b7k anymore which is fine as I'd probably prefer a seperate di box anyways not to mention there's some di box with cabinet SIM built in which is a bonus that sound great with bass guitar. Then again I could get the new cabdryvr from digitech too but that's a whole new discussion lol
Looking forward to hearing what you think. I'm just a little bit disappointed that I won't be one of a very tiny few people in this world with a Scrambler anymore, but I'm pretty excited for my friends at Ampeg and I truly think most people are going to love it.Just bought a Scrambler from Sweetwater. I will report back.
Why? Is he not an authorized dealer?A seller on ebay has one for $99. Must.....resist.....